FaultScore

FaultScore report

2016 Buick Cascada problems

Owners have filed 34 complaints about the 2016 Buick Cascada with NHTSA between 2016 and 2026. The largest single group is the body & structure. Across this model's run it ranks 1 of 3 worst.

C

FaultScore 60/100

Higher is worse. Measured against the other years of the Buick Cascada.

How this is worked out

The numbers

34

Complaints

0

Crashes reported

0

Fires reported

0

Injuries reported

18,500 mi

Median mileage at failure

Half of reported failures happened before this

56%

Failed under 36,000 miles

Inside a typical bumper-to-bumper warranty

What kind of bad

The letter says how bad. This says what kind — whether this year drew an unusual number of complaints, unusually dangerous ones, or failures that arrived unusually early.

Complaint volume 81 vs 50 Severity 0 vs 50 Early failure 96 vs 50
The dashed ring is 50 — the national norm. Further out is worse.
Complaint volume — 81
Against the median year of the Buick Cascada. 50 means typical for this model; 100 means roughly double.
Severity — 0
0% of these complaints involved a crash, fire, injury or death, against a national rate of 9.7%.
Early failure — 96
56% of failures with a mileage on record happened under 36,000 miles, against a national rate of 29%.

How 2016 compares with every other Buick Cascada

Click any bar to open that year's report.

Complaints filed with NHTSA, by model year. Bar colour is the FaultScore grade: A B C D F ungraded

What breaks on a 2016 Buick Cascada

Every complaint is filed against a part. Follow any row for the complaints about that part alone.

Body & Structure 10 29.4%

Median failure at 36,000 miles

Other & Unspecified 7 20.6%

Median failure at 43,000 miles

Windows, Mirrors & Wipers 5 14.7%

Median failure at 80,000 miles

Engine & Cooling 5 14.7%

Median failure at 6,000 miles

Electrical System 3 8.8%

Median failure at 2,504 miles

Wheels 2 5.9%

Median failure at 28,000 miles

Seat Belts 1 2.9%
Brakes 1 2.9%

Median failure at 16,231 miles

When it fails

Odometer readings owners gave when they filed. About half of all complaints include one.

Under 1,000 miles 1 6.3%
1,000 – 9,999 miles 5 31.3%
10,000 – 24,999 miles 3 18.8%
25,000 – 49,999 miles 2 12.5%
50,000 – 74,999 miles 2 12.5%
75,000 – 99,999 miles 3 18.8%

When owners complained

A spike years after the car went on sale usually means a part wearing out on schedule across the whole fleet — the kind of pattern no single owner can see from inside their own car.

May 2016 peak 3 Jun 2026

NHTSA investigations into the 2016 Buick Cascada

An investigation is the step before a recall: the agency has seen enough complaints to look into a pattern itself. An open one means it thinks something may be wrong and nothing has been fixed yet.

1 investigation is still open.

EA21002 Opened 17 Sep 2021 Still open AIR BAGS:FRONTAL:DRIVER SIDE:INFLATOR MODULE

Desiccated Air Bag Inflator Rupture

From 2000 through 2017, Takata produced millions of air bag inflators using two types of phase-stabilized ammonium nitrate ("PSAN") propellant -- propellant 2004 and propellant 2004L. After prolonged exposure to high temperature cycles and humidity, inflators using propellant 2004 can degrade, causing the propellant to burn too quickly when ignited. The rapid burning can cause the inflator to rupture during deployment, potentially causing serious or even fatal injury to vehicle occupants. See 2016 Blomquist Report at www.nhtsa.gov/sites/nhtsa.gov/files/documents/expert_report-hrblomquist.pdf.C...

Recalls on the 2016 Buick Cascada

A complaint is one owner's allegation. A recall is the point at which the manufacturer or a regulator agreed the defect is real and dangerous enough to fix for free — however old the car is.

United States — NHTSA

16V844000

VISIBILITY:POWER WINDOW DEVICES AND CONTROLS

General Motors LLC (GM) is recalling certain model year 2016 Buick Cascada vehicles manufactured December 1, 2015, to February 24, 2016. The affected vehicles may have had the original convertible roof control module (CRCM) replaced with an incorrect CRCM, that allows the windows to close automatically when the roof is closed and can allow the windows to be closed remotely from distances beyond 11 meters using the key fob. As such, these vehicles no longer meet the requirements of Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS) number 118, "Power-Operated Window Systems."

Risk: If the windows close automatically or can be closed remotely in ways that do not meet all the requirements of FMVSS 118, the unexpected closure can increase the risk of injury to the passengers.

Recalls cover specific build ranges, so check your own vehicle by VIN at nhtsa.gov/recalls or, in Canada, Transport Canada.

The most recent complaints

In the owners' own words, exactly as filed with NHTSA.

at 19,000 miles Christiansburg, VA

ENGINE AND ENGINE COOLING:EXHAUST SYSTEM:EMISSION CONTROL:CRANKCASE (PCV)

The contact owns a 2016 Buick Cascada. The contact stated that while driving at an undisclosed speed, the vehicle made an abnormal squealing sound. The vehicle was subsequently taken to the dealer, where it was diagnosed with a PCV valve failure. The vehicle was not repaired. The manufacturer was not notified of the failure. The approximate failure mileage was 19,000.

NHTSA complaint #11745874 — an unverified report by a vehicle owner.

Loudon, TN

UNKNOWN OR OTHER

Buick Cascada back window on the convertible tops coming apart, causing flooding inside the car, also there's a danger the window will come out driving down the road. Buick refuses to do anything.

NHTSA complaint #11731096 — an unverified report by a vehicle owner.

Loudon, TN

STRUCTURE:BODY

Buick Cascada back window on the convertible tops coming apart, causing flooding inside the car, also there's a danger the window will come out driving down the road. Buick refuses to do anything.

NHTSA complaint #11731096 — an unverified report by a vehicle owner.

Myrtle Beach, SC

UNKNOWN OR OTHER

The rear window of the convertible top starts to pull away from the top itself. Could separate and displace entirely causing damage or injury behind.

NHTSA complaint #11718797 — an unverified report by a vehicle owner.

Myrtle Beach, SC

STRUCTURE:BODY

The rear window of the convertible top starts to pull away from the top itself. Could separate and displace entirely causing damage or injury behind.

NHTSA complaint #11718797 — an unverified report by a vehicle owner.

Raymond, WA

STRUCTURE:BODY

The back window on the convertible top has separated from the fabric. Buick dealership said it was not a covered item under the extended warranty. We tried to glue it back down but it keeps separating all around. Dangerous situation because it could separate completely during travel and cause an accident/injury to others. Should be a recall item since it is being reported by several other Cascada owners.

NHTSA complaint #11718833 — an unverified report by a vehicle owner.

Suwanee, GA

ENGINE AND ENGINE COOLING:ENGINE:GASOLINE:TURBO/SUPERCHARGER

See attached document for complaint.

NHTSA complaint #11688051 — an unverified report by a vehicle owner.

Suwanee, GA

ENGINE AND ENGINE COOLING

See attached document for complaint.

NHTSA complaint #11688051 — an unverified report by a vehicle owner.

at 80,000 miles Southold, NY

VISIBILITY

The contact owns a 2016 Buick Cascada. The contact stated that when his wife entered the vehicle, the rear passenger’s side window automatically rolled down when the vehicle was started. The contact was unable to confirm if any warning lights were illuminated. The contact stated that the failure was related to NHTSA Campaign Number: 16V844000 (Visibility). The local dealer was not contacted. The vehicle was not diagnosed or repaired. The manufacturer was contacted and confirmed that the VIN was not under recall. The failure mileage was approximately 80,000.

NHTSA complaint #11675525 — an unverified report by a vehicle owner.

Canyon, TX

SEAT BELTS

The motor is out of the seat belt presenter on the driver's side. It does not present and makes a horrible sound. This part was ordered in July, 2024. I've contacted the dealer and Buick directly to find out when I can expect the part to be replaced. They've told me that the back is on an extended back order. I asked if the part could be replaced with a used part. They told me that because it's a safety-sensitive part, it has to be replaced with a new part. But this part has been on back order for months with no delivery in sight, and they expect me to drive my car like this with this "safety" issue compromised.

NHTSA complaint #11630157 — an unverified report by a vehicle owner.

Blaine, MN

VISIBILITY:GLASS, SIDE/REAR

The rear window on the Cascada is known to separate from the convertible top material, likely due to an insufficient amount of primer used during the assembly process, which creates stress points allowing the material to separate from the glass. Once this bond has started to fail, it is eventually going to lead to the glass completely falling off the car. It is likely that the glass separating could render the rear defrost inoperable, too, decreasing visibility. NHTSA bulletin 17-NA-216 describes this problem; why was no recall ever issued?

NHTSA complaint #11582433 — an unverified report by a vehicle owner.

Blaine, MN

STRUCTURE:BODY

The rear window on the Cascada is known to separate from the convertible top material, likely due to an insufficient amount of primer used during the assembly process, which creates stress points allowing the material to separate from the glass. Once this bond has started to fail, it is eventually going to lead to the glass completely falling off the car. It is likely that the glass separating could render the rear defrost inoperable, too, decreasing visibility. NHTSA bulletin 17-NA-216 describes this problem; why was no recall ever issued?

NHTSA complaint #11582433 — an unverified report by a vehicle owner.

Blaine, MN

VISIBILITY/WIPER

The rear window on the Cascada is known to separate from the convertible top material, likely due to an insufficient amount of primer used during the assembly process, which creates stress points allowing the material to separate from the glass. Once this bond has started to fail, it is eventually going to lead to the glass completely falling off the car. It is likely that the glass separating could render the rear defrost inoperable, too, decreasing visibility. NHTSA bulletin 17-NA-216 describes this problem; why was no recall ever issued?

NHTSA complaint #11582433 — an unverified report by a vehicle owner.

Capitol Heights, MD

UNKNOWN OR OTHER

My convertible top is not lining up with the windows. When it rain water on the floor . U don’t see where it’s coming from . I just see large amount of water

NHTSA complaint #11580207 — an unverified report by a vehicle owner.

Capitol Heights, MD

STRUCTURE:BODY

My convertible top is not lining up with the windows. When it rain water on the floor . U don’t see where it’s coming from . I just see large amount of water

NHTSA complaint #11580207 — an unverified report by a vehicle owner.

Capitol Heights, MD

ELECTRICAL SYSTEM

My convertible top is not lining up with the windows. When it rain water on the floor . U don’t see where it’s coming from . I just see large amount of water

NHTSA complaint #11580207 — an unverified report by a vehicle owner.

at 80,000 miles Rancho Santa Margarita, CA

STRUCTURE

The contact owns a 2016 Buick Cascada. The contact stated that the rear windshield glass had begun to separate from the convertible top headliner. The contact attempted to repair the failure by using epoxy glue, but the failure returned over time. The contact took the vehicle to a dealer where she was provided a quote to replace the top. Upon investigation, the contact discovered a service bulletin Manufacturer Communication Number: 17NA216 which she linked to the failure. The manufacturer was notified of the failure but provided no assistance. The vehicle was not repaired. The failure mileage was approximately 80,000.

NHTSA complaint #11466069 — an unverified report by a vehicle owner.

at 80,000 miles Rancho Santa Margarita, CA

VISIBILITY

The contact owns a 2016 Buick Cascada. The contact stated that the rear windshield glass had begun to separate from the convertible top headliner. The contact attempted to repair the failure by using epoxy glue, but the failure returned over time. The contact took the vehicle to a dealer where she was provided a quote to replace the top. Upon investigation, the contact discovered a service bulletin Manufacturer Communication Number: 17NA216 which she linked to the failure. The manufacturer was notified of the failure but provided no assistance. The vehicle was not repaired. The failure mileage was approximately 80,000.

NHTSA complaint #11466069 — an unverified report by a vehicle owner.

Janesville, WI

UNKNOWN OR OTHER

My rear window of my car is becoming unglued from the top. I talked to the GM dealership nearby, and they told me I needed a new top. There was a memo put out in 2019 stating that this was happening due to not having enough primer from the manufacturer. This is a safety hazard. If my window falls out, it can create a crash and harm any vehicle behind me. If GM knew this part was bad because of a manufacturer, they should be liable to fix the problem.

NHTSA complaint #11455952 — an unverified report by a vehicle owner.

Panama City, FL

STRUCTURE:BODY

My back window glass on convertible too is coming unsealed from the convertible top, if I pay to replace the top this has been reported 6 times already, and will happen again. Pointless to pay $3,000 dollars to have my top replaced. The glass is going to end up coming completely unsealed and fly off and hit someone’s car and cause an accident. My car has low milage and is financed under a reputable Buick dealership. This needs to be recalled immediately! The pictures I submitted are from a week ago, and the glass is now even more separated from the fabric.

NHTSA complaint #11450750 — an unverified report by a vehicle owner.

at 18,000 miles Baldwin, NY

VISIBILITY:WINDSHIELD

The contact owns a 2016 Buick Cascada. The contact stated that the rear windshield separated from the convertible top making it difficult to secure the top of the vehicle. The contact took the vehicle to the dealer who stated that the window and top of the vehicle needed to be replaced. The vehicle had not been repaired. The manufacturer was made aware of the failure. The contact was informed that the Vin was not under recall. The approximate failure mileage was 18,000.

NHTSA complaint #11420274 — an unverified report by a vehicle owner.

at 50,000 miles Milan, MI

WHEELS

I PURCHASED MY 2016 BUICK CASCADA IN 2017, IN THE SUMMER OF 2018 I NOTICED THE PAINT CHIPPING OFF ALL 4 OF MY RIMS. THEN IN DECEMBER OF 2020 I NOTICED THE BACK WINDOW STARTED TO BECOME UNATTACHED FROM THE CONVERTIBLE TOP. THE VEHICLE IS NOW OUT OF WARRANTY AND THE DEALERSHIP TELLS ME I NEED TO REPLACE THE ENTIRE TOP, WHICH IS ABSOLUTELY RIDICULOUS. I PAID $38,000 FOR A VEHICLE THAT IS FALLING APART. I DON'T UNDERSTAND WHY GENERAL MOTORS IT'S NOT HELD RESPONSIBLE FOR THIS?

NHTSA complaint #11396566 — an unverified report by a vehicle owner.

at 50,000 miles Milan, MI

UNKNOWN OR OTHER

I PURCHASED MY 2016 BUICK CASCADA IN 2017, IN THE SUMMER OF 2018 I NOTICED THE PAINT CHIPPING OFF ALL 4 OF MY RIMS. THEN IN DECEMBER OF 2020 I NOTICED THE BACK WINDOW STARTED TO BECOME UNATTACHED FROM THE CONVERTIBLE TOP. THE VEHICLE IS NOW OUT OF WARRANTY AND THE DEALERSHIP TELLS ME I NEED TO REPLACE THE ENTIRE TOP, WHICH IS ABSOLUTELY RIDICULOUS. I PAID $38,000 FOR A VEHICLE THAT IS FALLING APART. I DON'T UNDERSTAND WHY GENERAL MOTORS IT'S NOT HELD RESPONSIBLE FOR THIS?

NHTSA complaint #11396566 — an unverified report by a vehicle owner.

Winston Salem, NC

STRUCTURE:BODY

THE BACK WINDOW IS COMING AWAY FROM THE FABRIC TOP. HAD BEEN GETTING WORSE FOR MONTHS. I HAVE COMPLAINED TO GM. I WAS TOLD TO TAKE MY CAR TO DEALERSHIP I DID THAT MONTHS AGO, WHEN I STILL HAD WARRANTY. NOTHING WAS DONE. I HAVE TAKEN IT AGAIN TO DEALERSHIP BECAUSE THE WINDOW IS COMING OUT MORE. I NOW HAVE TO GET IT FIXED AND I HAVE TO PAY A PORTION OF THE COST OF A NEW TOP, SINCE THE WINDOW CANNOT BE PUT BACK PROPERLY. I AM MAD THAT THE DEALERSHIP WOULD NOT HELP WHEN IT FIRST STARTED AND THAT MOW. I HAVE TO PAY SOME NOW THAT I AM OUT OF WARRANTY.

NHTSA complaint #11378152 — an unverified report by a vehicle owner.

at 36,000 miles Raynham, MA

UNKNOWN OR OTHER

THE REAR GLASS WINDOW IS LIFTING ON THE BOTTOM LEFT CORNER. MY HUSBAND JUST NOTICED IT ONE DAY. A SERVICE BULLETIN WAS RELEASED BY GM IN NOVEMBER, 2019 REGARDING THIS ISSUE. MY INSURANCE WON'T COVER IT AS IT WAS NOT CAUSED BY AN OUTSIDE FORCE. SAFETY HAZARD: IF I DRIVE WITH MY WINDOWS OPEN AND TOP UP, I'M AFRAID THE PRESSURE WILL CAUSE THE WINDOW TO DETACH, WHICH WOULD INJURE ANY VEHICLE BEHIND ME. THIS SHOULD BE A GM RECALL. THE GLASS CAN NOT BE REPLACED WITHOUT REPLACING THE ENTIRE SOFT TOP.

NHTSA complaint #11339734 — an unverified report by a vehicle owner.