FaultScore

FaultScore report

2024 Cadillac Redundant Lyriq problems

Owners have filed 50 complaints about the 2024 Cadillac Redundant Lyriq with NHTSA between 2023 and 2025. The largest single group is the driver assist & collision avoidance.

Not graded

Too few complaints, or too short a model run, to compare fairly.

How this is worked out

The numbers

50

Complaints

5

Crashes reported

0

Fires reported

3

Injuries reported

145 mi

Median mileage at failure

Half of reported failures happened before this

100%

Failed under 36,000 miles

Inside a typical bumper-to-bumper warranty

What breaks on a 2024 Cadillac Redundant Lyriq

Every complaint is filed against a part. Follow any row for the complaints about that part alone.

2 crashes, 0 fires · median 100 mi

Electrical System 8 16.0%

Median failure at 122 miles

Lights 7 14.0%
Brakes 6 12.0%

3 crashes, 0 fires · median 5,000 mi

Other & Unspecified 3 6.0%
Tires 1 2.0%

Median failure at 7,000 miles

Body & Structure 1 2.0%

Median failure at 99 miles

Engine & Cooling 1 2.0%

Exactly what failed

NHTSA files every complaint against a named sub-assembly, not just a system. This is the difference between knowing it was "the engine" and knowing which part of it — the list to hand a mechanic.

Automatic Emergency Braking 6 27.3%
Warnings 6 27.3%
Automatic System Braking 3 13.6%
Adaptive Cruise Control 3 13.6%
Warnings 2 9.1%
Pressure Monitoring AND Regulating Systems 1 4.5%
Instrument Cluster/Panel 1 4.5%

When owners complained

A spike years after the car went on sale usually means a part wearing out on schedule across the whole fleet — the kind of pattern no single owner can see from inside their own car.

Jul 2023 peak 11 Nov 2025

NHTSA investigations into the 2024 Cadillac Redundant Lyriq

An investigation is the step before a recall: the agency has seen enough complaints to look into a pattern itself. An open one means it thinks something may be wrong and nothing has been fixed yet.

1 investigation is still open.

EA26006 Opened 21 Aug 2026 Still open SERVICE BRAKES

Electronic Brake Module Component Failure

On April 11, 2024, the Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) opened Preliminary Evaluation PE24011 after receiving complaints concerning a loss of brake assist in 2023 MY Cadillac Lyriq vehicles. These complaints allege a hard brake pedal, followed by a “Brake System Failure” message at start up or while driving. GM shared records regarding several internal investigations for loss of brake assist due to alleged spindle fractures in the eBoost system. GM has stated that in the event of a spindle fracture, anti-lock brakes (ABS), stability control, and traction control remain functional until th...

Complaints that involved harm

Reports where the owner recorded a crash, a fire, an injury or a death.

Hot Springs Village, AR Crash 1 injured

SERVICE BRAKES

I am submitting this follow-up to document new information and continuing concerns regarding my 2024 Cadillac Lyriq EV, which experienced sudden unintended acceleration during a parking maneuver. GM and its claims administrator (ESIS) have now completed their review and issued a denial letter on October 31 2025, stating “no defects were found.” However, the denial included no supporting technical findings, analysis, or data explaining how that conclusion was reached. Despite multiple written requests, GM has not provided the following key event-data modules: – Brake System Control Module (EBCM/iBooster) export (brake pressure, pedal position, brake override flags) – Propulsion/Drive Control Module data (torque request vs actual torque and accelerator input) – Front Camera Module metadata (timestamps and event record IDs) Additionally, several data discrepancies remain unresolved — including mismatched timestamps between the ASCM and FCM reports and camera images that do not correspond to the actual crash scene. On October 29 2025, GM publicly announced Customer Satisfaction Program N252521980, covering certain 2023–24 Cadillac Lyriq and 2024 Chevy Blazer EV vehicles for a Brake System Control Module software update due to possible brake-control performance issues. Because my incident involved loss of braking response, this recall appears directly relevant. I have requested confirmation whether my vehicle is affected and whether this module was analyzed in GM’s investigation, but have not received a reply. I am requesting that NHTSA review GM’s handling of this case to determine whether the engineering review was complete and whether the vehicle’s BSCM or related systems could be implicated in unintended acceleration or brake override failures. GM Case #1092995 – Submitted to ESIS/GM Product Investigations Group. Thank you for your attention and for documenting this matter in the defect database.

NHTSA complaint #11697614 — an unverified report by a vehicle owner.

Hot Springs Village, AR Crash 1 injured

FORWARD COLLISION AVOIDANCE: WARNINGS

I am submitting this follow-up to document new information and continuing concerns regarding my 2024 Cadillac Lyriq EV, which experienced sudden unintended acceleration during a parking maneuver. GM and its claims administrator (ESIS) have now completed their review and issued a denial letter on October 31 2025, stating “no defects were found.” However, the denial included no supporting technical findings, analysis, or data explaining how that conclusion was reached. Despite multiple written requests, GM has not provided the following key event-data modules: – Brake System Control Module (EBCM/iBooster) export (brake pressure, pedal position, brake override flags) – Propulsion/Drive Control Module data (torque request vs actual torque and accelerator input) – Front Camera Module metadata (timestamps and event record IDs) Additionally, several data discrepancies remain unresolved — including mismatched timestamps between the ASCM and FCM reports and camera images that do not correspond to the actual crash scene. On October 29 2025, GM publicly announced Customer Satisfaction Program N252521980, covering certain 2023–24 Cadillac Lyriq and 2024 Chevy Blazer EV vehicles for a Brake System Control Module software update due to possible brake-control performance issues. Because my incident involved loss of braking response, this recall appears directly relevant. I have requested confirmation whether my vehicle is affected and whether this module was analyzed in GM’s investigation, but have not received a reply. I am requesting that NHTSA review GM’s handling of this case to determine whether the engineering review was complete and whether the vehicle’s BSCM or related systems could be implicated in unintended acceleration or brake override failures. GM Case #1092995 – Submitted to ESIS/GM Product Investigations Group. Thank you for your attention and for documenting this matter in the defect database.

NHTSA complaint #11697614 — an unverified report by a vehicle owner.

Hot Springs Village, AR Crash 1 injured

FORWARD COLLISION AVOIDANCE: AUTOMATIC EMERGENCY BRAKING

I am submitting this follow-up to document new information and continuing concerns regarding my 2024 Cadillac Lyriq EV, which experienced sudden unintended acceleration during a parking maneuver. GM and its claims administrator (ESIS) have now completed their review and issued a denial letter on October 31 2025, stating “no defects were found.” However, the denial included no supporting technical findings, analysis, or data explaining how that conclusion was reached. Despite multiple written requests, GM has not provided the following key event-data modules: – Brake System Control Module (EBCM/iBooster) export (brake pressure, pedal position, brake override flags) – Propulsion/Drive Control Module data (torque request vs actual torque and accelerator input) – Front Camera Module metadata (timestamps and event record IDs) Additionally, several data discrepancies remain unresolved — including mismatched timestamps between the ASCM and FCM reports and camera images that do not correspond to the actual crash scene. On October 29 2025, GM publicly announced Customer Satisfaction Program N252521980, covering certain 2023–24 Cadillac Lyriq and 2024 Chevy Blazer EV vehicles for a Brake System Control Module software update due to possible brake-control performance issues. Because my incident involved loss of braking response, this recall appears directly relevant. I have requested confirmation whether my vehicle is affected and whether this module was analyzed in GM’s investigation, but have not received a reply. I am requesting that NHTSA review GM’s handling of this case to determine whether the engineering review was complete and whether the vehicle’s BSCM or related systems could be implicated in unintended acceleration or brake override failures. GM Case #1092995 – Submitted to ESIS/GM Product Investigations Group. Thank you for your attention and for documenting this matter in the defect database.

NHTSA complaint #11697614 — an unverified report by a vehicle owner.

Santa Monica, CA Crash

SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC

See attached document for complaint.

NHTSA complaint #11629152 — an unverified report by a vehicle owner.

at 3,000 miles Bellevue, WA Crash

SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC

The contact owns a 2024 Cadillac Lyriq. The contact stated while driving at approximately 3 MPH as she was entering her garage to park the vehicle, she depressed the brake pedal, however, the vehicle continued forward and crashed into a tool chest located at the back of the garage wall. The contact stated that the front of the grill and the front bumper were damaged and had to be replaced. The contact stated no warning light was illuminated. The contact stated that failure reoccurred when she was parking the vehicle in a parking lot. The contact had taken the vehicle to a local dealer, where it was diagnosed and determined that the ABS system had failed and caused a loss of braking ability. The contact was advised by the dealer that the failure was related to NHTSA Campaign Number: 24V589000 (Service Brakes, Hydraulic). The contact had the recall completed at that time. The manufacturer was informed of the failure. The failure mileage was 3,000.

NHTSA complaint #11612377 — an unverified report by a vehicle owner.

The most recent complaints

In the owners' own words, exactly as filed with NHTSA.

Hot Springs Village, AR Crash 1 injured

SERVICE BRAKES

I am submitting this follow-up to document new information and continuing concerns regarding my 2024 Cadillac Lyriq EV, which experienced sudden unintended acceleration during a parking maneuver. GM and its claims administrator (ESIS) have now completed their review and issued a denial letter on October 31 2025, stating “no defects were found.” However, the denial included no supporting technical findings, analysis, or data explaining how that conclusion was reached. Despite multiple written requests, GM has not provided the following key event-data modules: – Brake System Control Module (EBCM/iBooster) export (brake pressure, pedal position, brake override flags) – Propulsion/Drive Control Module data (torque request vs actual torque and accelerator input) – Front Camera Module metadata (timestamps and event record IDs) Additionally, several data discrepancies remain unresolved — including mismatched timestamps between the ASCM and FCM reports and camera images that do not correspond to the actual crash scene. On October 29 2025, GM publicly announced Customer Satisfaction Program N252521980, covering certain 2023–24 Cadillac Lyriq and 2024 Chevy Blazer EV vehicles for a Brake System Control Module software update due to possible brake-control performance issues. Because my incident involved loss of braking response, this recall appears directly relevant. I have requested confirmation whether my vehicle is affected and whether this module was analyzed in GM’s investigation, but have not received a reply. I am requesting that NHTSA review GM’s handling of this case to determine whether the engineering review was complete and whether the vehicle’s BSCM or related systems could be implicated in unintended acceleration or brake override failures. GM Case #1092995 – Submitted to ESIS/GM Product Investigations Group. Thank you for your attention and for documenting this matter in the defect database.

NHTSA complaint #11697614 — an unverified report by a vehicle owner.

Hot Springs Village, AR Crash 1 injured

FORWARD COLLISION AVOIDANCE: WARNINGS

I am submitting this follow-up to document new information and continuing concerns regarding my 2024 Cadillac Lyriq EV, which experienced sudden unintended acceleration during a parking maneuver. GM and its claims administrator (ESIS) have now completed their review and issued a denial letter on October 31 2025, stating “no defects were found.” However, the denial included no supporting technical findings, analysis, or data explaining how that conclusion was reached. Despite multiple written requests, GM has not provided the following key event-data modules: – Brake System Control Module (EBCM/iBooster) export (brake pressure, pedal position, brake override flags) – Propulsion/Drive Control Module data (torque request vs actual torque and accelerator input) – Front Camera Module metadata (timestamps and event record IDs) Additionally, several data discrepancies remain unresolved — including mismatched timestamps between the ASCM and FCM reports and camera images that do not correspond to the actual crash scene. On October 29 2025, GM publicly announced Customer Satisfaction Program N252521980, covering certain 2023–24 Cadillac Lyriq and 2024 Chevy Blazer EV vehicles for a Brake System Control Module software update due to possible brake-control performance issues. Because my incident involved loss of braking response, this recall appears directly relevant. I have requested confirmation whether my vehicle is affected and whether this module was analyzed in GM’s investigation, but have not received a reply. I am requesting that NHTSA review GM’s handling of this case to determine whether the engineering review was complete and whether the vehicle’s BSCM or related systems could be implicated in unintended acceleration or brake override failures. GM Case #1092995 – Submitted to ESIS/GM Product Investigations Group. Thank you for your attention and for documenting this matter in the defect database.

NHTSA complaint #11697614 — an unverified report by a vehicle owner.

Hot Springs Village, AR Crash 1 injured

FORWARD COLLISION AVOIDANCE: AUTOMATIC EMERGENCY BRAKING

I am submitting this follow-up to document new information and continuing concerns regarding my 2024 Cadillac Lyriq EV, which experienced sudden unintended acceleration during a parking maneuver. GM and its claims administrator (ESIS) have now completed their review and issued a denial letter on October 31 2025, stating “no defects were found.” However, the denial included no supporting technical findings, analysis, or data explaining how that conclusion was reached. Despite multiple written requests, GM has not provided the following key event-data modules: – Brake System Control Module (EBCM/iBooster) export (brake pressure, pedal position, brake override flags) – Propulsion/Drive Control Module data (torque request vs actual torque and accelerator input) – Front Camera Module metadata (timestamps and event record IDs) Additionally, several data discrepancies remain unresolved — including mismatched timestamps between the ASCM and FCM reports and camera images that do not correspond to the actual crash scene. On October 29 2025, GM publicly announced Customer Satisfaction Program N252521980, covering certain 2023–24 Cadillac Lyriq and 2024 Chevy Blazer EV vehicles for a Brake System Control Module software update due to possible brake-control performance issues. Because my incident involved loss of braking response, this recall appears directly relevant. I have requested confirmation whether my vehicle is affected and whether this module was analyzed in GM’s investigation, but have not received a reply. I am requesting that NHTSA review GM’s handling of this case to determine whether the engineering review was complete and whether the vehicle’s BSCM or related systems could be implicated in unintended acceleration or brake override failures. GM Case #1092995 – Submitted to ESIS/GM Product Investigations Group. Thank you for your attention and for documenting this matter in the defect database.

NHTSA complaint #11697614 — an unverified report by a vehicle owner.

Salem, OR

FORWARD COLLISION AVOIDANCE: WARNINGS

THIS IS AN ISSUE THAT HAS BEEN UNDER RECALL SINCE JUNE 2025. WE HAVE HAD THE DEALER DO THE RECALL, HAD OVER THE AIR UPDATES AND IT STILL CAUSES ALL THE ADVANCED DRIVER ASSISTANCE SYSTEM SCREEN TO GO BLACK AND DISABLES THEM. DEALER MSYATES ALL RECALLS HAVE BEEN COMPLETED.

NHTSA complaint #11697474 — an unverified report by a vehicle owner.

Salem, OR

FORWARD COLLISION AVOIDANCE: ADAPTIVE CRUISE CONTROL

THIS IS AN ISSUE THAT HAS BEEN UNDER RECALL SINCE JUNE 2025. WE HAVE HAD THE DEALER DO THE RECALL, HAD OVER THE AIR UPDATES AND IT STILL CAUSES ALL THE ADVANCED DRIVER ASSISTANCE SYSTEM SCREEN TO GO BLACK AND DISABLES THEM. DEALER MSYATES ALL RECALLS HAVE BEEN COMPLETED.

NHTSA complaint #11697474 — an unverified report by a vehicle owner.

Salem, OR

FORWARD COLLISION AVOIDANCE: AUTOMATIC EMERGENCY BRAKING

THIS IS AN ISSUE THAT HAS BEEN UNDER RECALL SINCE JUNE 2025. WE HAVE HAD THE DEALER DO THE RECALL, HAD OVER THE AIR UPDATES AND IT STILL CAUSES ALL THE ADVANCED DRIVER ASSISTANCE SYSTEM SCREEN TO GO BLACK AND DISABLES THEM. DEALER MSYATES ALL RECALLS HAVE BEEN COMPLETED.

NHTSA complaint #11697474 — an unverified report by a vehicle owner.

at 7,000 miles Country Club Hills, IL

SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC

The contact owns a 2024 Cadillac Lyriq. The contact stated that while driving under 35 MPH on several occasions, the brakes were independently activated. The TPMS warning light was illuminated intermittently. Additionally, the front passenger’s side tire was flat. The vehicle was taken to a dealer where it was diagnosed and determined that an undisclosed system software needed to be updated. The vehicle was repaired but the failure persisted. The manufacturer was notified of the failure. The failure mileage was approximately 7,000.

NHTSA complaint #11648652 — an unverified report by a vehicle owner.

at 7,000 miles Country Club Hills, IL

TIRES:PRESSURE MONITORING AND REGULATING SYSTEMS

The contact owns a 2024 Cadillac Lyriq. The contact stated that while driving under 35 MPH on several occasions, the brakes were independently activated. The TPMS warning light was illuminated intermittently. Additionally, the front passenger’s side tire was flat. The vehicle was taken to a dealer where it was diagnosed and determined that an undisclosed system software needed to be updated. The vehicle was repaired but the failure persisted. The manufacturer was notified of the failure. The failure mileage was approximately 7,000.

NHTSA complaint #11648652 — an unverified report by a vehicle owner.

Santa Monica, CA Crash

SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC

See attached document for complaint.

NHTSA complaint #11629152 — an unverified report by a vehicle owner.

at 3,400 miles Simpsonville, SC

FORWARD COLLISION AVOIDANCE: AUTOMATIC EMERGENCY BRAKING

The contact owns a 2024 Cadillac Lyriq. The contact stated while driving approximately 35 MPH, the Forward Collision Avoidance: Automatic Emergency Braking system unintentionally engaged. No warning light was illuminated. The vehicle was taken to a dealer to be diagnosed; however, the dealer stated that the cause of the failure could not be determined. The dealer was unable to duplicate the failure. The vehicle was not repaired. The manufacturer was notified of the failure. The failure mileage was approximately 3,400.

NHTSA complaint #11627512 — an unverified report by a vehicle owner.

at 3,000 miles Bellevue, WA Crash

SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC

The contact owns a 2024 Cadillac Lyriq. The contact stated while driving at approximately 3 MPH as she was entering her garage to park the vehicle, she depressed the brake pedal, however, the vehicle continued forward and crashed into a tool chest located at the back of the garage wall. The contact stated that the front of the grill and the front bumper were damaged and had to be replaced. The contact stated no warning light was illuminated. The contact stated that failure reoccurred when she was parking the vehicle in a parking lot. The contact had taken the vehicle to a local dealer, where it was diagnosed and determined that the ABS system had failed and caused a loss of braking ability. The contact was advised by the dealer that the failure was related to NHTSA Campaign Number: 24V589000 (Service Brakes, Hydraulic). The contact had the recall completed at that time. The manufacturer was informed of the failure. The failure mileage was 3,000.

NHTSA complaint #11612377 — an unverified report by a vehicle owner.

at 145 miles Canfield, OH

ELECTRICAL SYSTEM

The contact owns a 2024 Cadillac Lyric. The contact stated that the brakes erroneously activated while attempting to reverse. The contact stated that the failure occurred only while it was raining. There were no warning lights illuminated. The vehicle was taken to the dealer, and it was suggested to deactivate the Back Over Prevention and Cross Traffic Alerts while attempting to reverse. The vehicle had not been diagnosed or repaired. The manufacturer was made aware of the failure by the dealer. The failure mileage was 145.

NHTSA complaint #11606109 — an unverified report by a vehicle owner.

at 145 miles Canfield, OH

BACK OVER PREVENTION: AUTOMATIC SYSTEM BRAKING

The contact owns a 2024 Cadillac Lyric. The contact stated that the brakes erroneously activated while attempting to reverse. The contact stated that the failure occurred only while it was raining. There were no warning lights illuminated. The vehicle was taken to the dealer, and it was suggested to deactivate the Back Over Prevention and Cross Traffic Alerts while attempting to reverse. The vehicle had not been diagnosed or repaired. The manufacturer was made aware of the failure by the dealer. The failure mileage was 145.

NHTSA complaint #11606109 — an unverified report by a vehicle owner.

at 100 miles Bowling Green, KY

BACK OVER PREVENTION: AUTOMATIC SYSTEM BRAKING

The contact owns a 2024 Cadillac Lyriq. The contact stated that while reversing from the driveway, the brake pedal was applied without driver input. The contact stated that the vehicle detected an unknown object, causing the brakes to be applied, but the contact determined that there was no object behind the vehicle. While driving at 50–60 MPH, the brakes were applied without application. There were unknown warning lights illuminated. The vehicle was taken to the local dealer, who was unable to determine the cause of the failure. The computer was reset. The vehicle was not repaired. The manufacturer was contacted, but further assistance was not provided. The failure mileage was approximately 100.

NHTSA complaint #11594736 — an unverified report by a vehicle owner.

at 100 miles Bowling Green, KY

FORWARD COLLISION AVOIDANCE: AUTOMATIC EMERGENCY BRAKING

The contact owns a 2024 Cadillac Lyriq. The contact stated that while reversing from the driveway, the brake pedal was applied without driver input. The contact stated that the vehicle detected an unknown object, causing the brakes to be applied, but the contact determined that there was no object behind the vehicle. While driving at 50–60 MPH, the brakes were applied without application. There were unknown warning lights illuminated. The vehicle was taken to the local dealer, who was unable to determine the cause of the failure. The computer was reset. The vehicle was not repaired. The manufacturer was contacted, but further assistance was not provided. The failure mileage was approximately 100.

NHTSA complaint #11594736 — an unverified report by a vehicle owner.

Pearland, TX

EXTERIOR LIGHTING

While driving at night, my headlights will randomly aim down. Can’t see the road ahead. When high beams are activated, they blast the front of the car. Cannot see anything down the road.

NHTSA complaint #11579613 — an unverified report by a vehicle owner.

Palm Springs, CA

EXTERIOR LIGHTING

Unable to see behind the vehicle in the dark. There is no backup camera image at night, screen remains black.

NHTSA complaint #11574475 — an unverified report by a vehicle owner.

Berkeley Heights, NJ

EXTERIOR LIGHTING

The auto leveling lights drift during driving. On staff up, the headlights will point up and down, then self level. However, for the past week, the right headlight drifts down towards the road and the left headlight will drift upwards after about 20-30 minutes of driving. The downward drifting headlight only illuminates about 1 car length ahead while the upward drifting headlight will point towards overhead street signs. This causes reduced visibility with increased flare and reduced headlight throw at the same time. It also is dangerous to incoming traffic since the left headlight ends up drifting upward to produce a throw similar to a high beam, even though the high beams are off. The only way to get the lights to re-level is to shut off the vehicle and restart. Even after this, the lights will only be at the correct level for about 20-30 minutes as they start to drift in opposite vertical directions while driving. There have been multiple reports of similar cases on forums discussing the Cadillac Lyriq. Since the problem only occurs noticeably after 20-30 of night driving, the dealer has stated they can not reproduce it while in their possession. There are no warning messages or codes displayed.

NHTSA complaint #11574592 — an unverified report by a vehicle owner.

Palm Springs, CA

ELECTRICAL SYSTEM

Unable to see behind the vehicle in the dark. There is no backup camera image at night, screen remains black.

NHTSA complaint #11574475 — an unverified report by a vehicle owner.

Oyster bay, NY

ELECTRICAL SYSTEM

Within two month the Lithium ion battery failed twice. and the car was not derivable. It had to bet towed to the dealer.

NHTSA complaint #11574022 — an unverified report by a vehicle owner.

Oyster bay, NY

FORWARD COLLISION AVOIDANCE: WARNINGS

Within two month the Lithium ion battery failed twice. and the car was not derivable. It had to bet towed to the dealer.

NHTSA complaint #11574022 — an unverified report by a vehicle owner.

Oyster bay, NY

BACK OVER PREVENTION: WARNINGS

Within two month the Lithium ion battery failed twice. and the car was not derivable. It had to bet towed to the dealer.

NHTSA complaint #11574022 — an unverified report by a vehicle owner.

Rayne, LA

UNKNOWN OR OTHER

Backup camera is black with lines when shifting in reverse. Unable to see to backup and almost hit someone walking behind me

NHTSA complaint #11573498 — an unverified report by a vehicle owner.

Rayne, LA

EXTERIOR LIGHTING

Backup camera is black with lines when shifting in reverse. Unable to see to backup and almost hit someone walking behind me

NHTSA complaint #11573498 — an unverified report by a vehicle owner.

Huntsville, AL

ELECTRICAL SYSTEM

While driving the 12V battery system failed as well as the high voltage charging system. The vehicle lost traction control in the rain and was slipping on the road. The forward collision detection also intermittently goes out. If you are in one pedal driving mode and using adaptive cruise control when the forward collision detection goes out it will deactivate adaptive cruise control and apply enough regenerative breaking to rapidly slow the car. If the driver does not have their foot on the accelerator when this happens and you are in traffic it could cause an accident. The vehicle is not saving any diagnostic information regarding these failures and dealerships will not work the failures without diagnostic codes.

NHTSA complaint #11567137 — an unverified report by a vehicle owner.