Mitsubishi Outlander Phev vs Volvo WIA
Both cars' complete complaint records, side by side.
Read the totals carefully. NHTSA publishes no sales figures, so the car that sold more collects more complaints regardless of quality. The rows worth weighing are the proportions — the share of complaints that involved harm, and which part dominates.
| Measure | Mitsubishi Outlander Phev | Volvo WIA |
|---|---|---|
| Complaints on file | 37 | 91 |
| Model years covered | 2018–2025 | 1989–1999 |
| Worst model year | — | 1996 |
| Best model year | — | 1997 |
| Crashes reported | 7 | 0 |
| Fires reported | 2 | 1 |
| Injuries reported | 0 | 1 |
| Deaths reported | 0 | 0 |
| Most complained-about part | Brakes | Suspension |
| Share of complaints involving harm | 24.3% | 2.2% |
Mitsubishi Outlander Phev by year
What breaks
Brakes
6
16.2%
Acceleration & Cruise Control
6
16.2%
Transmission & Drivetrain
5
13.5%
Electrical System
5
13.5%
Fuel & Propulsion
3
8.1%
Other & Unspecified
3
8.1%
Engine & Cooling
2
5.4%
Windows, Mirrors & Wipers
2
5.4%
Volvo WIA by year
What breaks
Suspension
20
22.0%
Electrical System
14
15.4%
Transmission & Drivetrain
12
13.2%
Engine & Cooling
7
7.7%
Body & Structure
7
7.7%
Steering
6
6.6%
Equipment & Accessories
6
6.6%
Brakes
5
5.5%