Mitsubishi Raider vs Chrysler Sebring Conv
Both cars' complete complaint records, side by side.
Read the totals carefully. NHTSA publishes no sales figures, so the car that sold more collects more complaints regardless of quality. The rows worth weighing are the proportions — the share of complaints that involved harm, and which part dominates.
| Measure | Mitsubishi Raider | Chrysler Sebring Conv |
|---|---|---|
| Complaints on file | 126 | 308 |
| Model years covered | 2006–2009 | 2006–2010 |
| Worst model year | — | 2008 |
| Best model year | — | 2010 |
| Crashes reported | 9 | 12 |
| Fires reported | 1 | 1 |
| Injuries reported | 5 | 10 |
| Deaths reported | 0 | 0 |
| Most complained-about part | Airbags | Electrical System |
| Share of complaints involving harm | 11.9% | 7.5% |
Mitsubishi Raider by year
What breaks
Airbags
56
44.4%
Electrical System
14
11.1%
Transmission & Drivetrain
13
10.3%
Brakes
12
9.5%
Engine & Cooling
6
4.8%
Suspension
4
3.2%
Acceleration & Cruise Control
3
2.4%
Lights
3
2.4%
Chrysler Sebring Conv by year
What breaks
Electrical System
90
29.2%
Engine & Cooling
37
12.0%
Airbags
36
11.7%
Transmission & Drivetrain
22
7.1%
Body & Structure
18
5.8%
Acceleration & Cruise Control
14
4.5%
Other & Unspecified
14
4.5%
Brakes
12
3.9%