FaultScore

FaultScore report

1999 Daewoo Puerto Rico Lanos problems

Owners have filed 11 complaints about the 1999 Daewoo Puerto Rico Lanos with NHTSA between 2001 and 2007. The largest single group is the engine & cooling. Across this model's run it ranks 3 of 3 worst.

B

FaultScore 26/100

Higher is worse. Measured against the other years of the Daewoo Puerto Rico Lanos.

How this is worked out

The numbers

11

Complaints

0

Crashes reported

1

Fires reported

0

Injuries reported

73,500 mi

Median mileage at failure

Half of reported failures happened before this

0%

Failed under 36,000 miles

Inside a typical bumper-to-bumper warranty

What kind of bad

The letter says how bad. This says what kind — whether this year drew an unusual number of complaints, unusually dangerous ones, or failures that arrived unusually early.

Complaint volume 23 vs 50 Severity 47 vs 50 Early failure 0 vs 50
The dashed ring is 50 — the national norm. Further out is worse.
Complaint volume — 23
Against the median year of the Daewoo Puerto Rico Lanos. 50 means typical for this model; 100 means roughly double.
Severity — 47
9.1% of these complaints involved a crash, fire, injury or death, against a national rate of 9.7%.
Early failure — 0
0% of failures with a mileage on record happened under 36,000 miles, against a national rate of 29%.

How 1999 compares with every other Daewoo Puerto Rico Lanos

Click any bar to open that year's report.

Complaints filed with NHTSA, by model year. Bar colour is the FaultScore grade: A B C D F ungraded

What breaks on a 1999 Daewoo Puerto Rico Lanos

Every complaint is filed against a part. Follow any row for the complaints about that part alone.

Engine & Cooling 8 72.7%

0 crashes, 1 fires · median 75,000 mi

Airbags 2 18.2%

Median failure at 72,000 miles

Brakes 1 9.1%

When it fails

Odometer readings owners gave when they filed. About half of all complaints include one.

50,000 – 74,999 miles 3 50.0%
75,000 – 99,999 miles 2 33.3%
100,000 – 149,999 miles 1 16.7%

When owners complained

A spike years after the car went on sale usually means a part wearing out on schedule across the whole fleet — the kind of pattern no single owner can see from inside their own car.

Nov 2001 peak 2 Dec 2007

Complaints that involved harm

Reports where the owner recorded a crash, a fire, an injury or a death.

Duluth, GA Fire

ENGINE AND ENGINE COOLING:ENGINE:GASOLINE

THIS AUTO WAS DESTROYED BY AN ENGINE FIRE. BECAUSE THE MANUFACTURER CANNOT DETERMINE THE CAUSE OF THE FIRE, IT STATES THAT IT WILL NOT HONOR ITS WARRANTY. WE FEEL THAT THERE IS A SAFETY PROBLEM OR DEFECT THAT SHOULD BE INVESTIGATED AS CAUSE OF THIS FIRE.

NHTSA complaint #754454 — an unverified report by a vehicle owner.

The most recent complaints

In the owners' own words, exactly as filed with NHTSA.

at 80,200 miles Pasadena, CA

ENGINE AND ENGINE COOLING

TL*THE CONTACT OWNS A 1999 DAEWOO LANOS. THE CONTACT RECEIVED A RECALL NOTICE FOR NHTSA CAMPAIGN ID NUMBER 04V357000 (ENGINE AND ENGINE COOLING) AND IMMEDIATELY SCHEDULED AN APPOINTMENT TO HAVE THE VEHICLE REPAIRED. ONE WEEK LATER, SHE NOTICED THAT THE ENGINE LIGHT WAS ILLUMINATED ON THE INSTRUMENT PANEL. A LOCAL MECHANIC STATED THAT THE CAM SHAFT SENSOR WAS CAUSING THE ENGINE LIGHT TO ILLUMINATE. THE POWERTRAIN WAS UNKNOWN. THE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 80,200 AND CURRENT MILEAGE WAS 80,233.

NHTSA complaint #10213290 — an unverified report by a vehicle owner.

at 75,000 miles Oakland, CA

ENGINE AND ENGINE COOLING

DT*: THE CONTACT STATED THE VEHICLE HAD A NHTSA RECALL #04V357000 ON THE TIMING CHAIN. THE SERVICE DEALER REFUSED TO PERFORM THE RECALL WORK. AFTER COMMUNICATING BETWEEN THE DEALER AND THE MANUFACTURER FOR OVER ONE MONTH, THE TIMING CHAIN FRACTURED. THE DEALER REFUSED TO PERFORM THE RECALL. THE TIMING CHAIN WAS REPLACED BY AN INDEPENDENT REPAIR SHOP. UPDATED 02/12/07.

NHTSA complaint #10174836 — an unverified report by a vehicle owner.

at 103,333 miles Oxnard, CA

ENGINE AND ENGINE COOLING:ENGINE

DT*: THE CONTACT STATED THAT THE MAIN CONCERN WAS THAT THE DAEWOO WOULD NOT PERFORM A RECALL REMEDY REPAIR #04V357000 AT THE NEAREST SERVICE DEALER WHERE THE CONTACT LIVES. THE MANUFACTURER INSTRUCTED THE CONTACT TO TAKE THE VEHICLE TO OXNARD SERVICE DEALER. THE CONTACT REFUSED TO TAKE THE VEHICLE TO OXNARD FOR THE REMEDY REPAIR DUE TO THE DISTANCE. . ONLY DAEWOO SELLS THE PARTS BUT WOULD NOT REMEDY RECALL IN THE CONTACT'S VICINITY. THE DEALER WILL NEED TO REPAIR THE ENGINE SENSOR AND REPLACE THE IN LINE FUSE TO THE CAMSHAFT POSITION SENSOR WIRING.

NHTSA complaint #10164531 — an unverified report by a vehicle owner.

Orlando, FL

ENGINE AND ENGINE COOLING:ENGINE

DT: THE CONTACT STATED THAT THEY RECEIVED A RECALL LETTER PERTAINING TO THE CAM SHAFT POSITION SENSOR AND TOOK THE VEHICLE IN TO BE SERVICED BY THE DEALER. THE DEALERS DETERMINED THAT THE VIN NUMBER OF VEHICLE DID NOT MATCH VEHICLE AND THEY CHECKED IT OUT AND STATED THAT THERE WAS NO SERVICE NEEDED. AS THE VEHICLE WAS PULLING OUT OF THE LOT THE CONTACT NOTICED THAT AS THE VEHICLE WAS ACCELERATING IT WOULD MERGE OR LEAN TO THE RIGHT. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO AN INDEPENDENT MECHANICS WHO STATED THAT THE DEALERS MIGHT HAVE TAMPERED WITH THE VEHICLE. THE DEALERS HAVE NOT BEEN CALLED BACK DUE TO THE FACT THE CONTACT FEELS AS IF THE DEALERS TAMPERED WITH THE VEHICLE IN ORDER TO CHARGE FOR REPAIRS. **MODEL= NUBIRA*

NHTSA complaint #10163270 — an unverified report by a vehicle owner.

at 71,200 miles Miami, FL

ENGINE AND ENGINE COOLING

SINCE I BOUGHT THE CAR THE CHECK ENGINE LIGHT WAS ON ALWAYS I TRIED SEVERAL TIMES TO TAKE INTO THE DEALER AND THEY DIDN'T FIND ANYTHING BAD THE LIGHT REMAINED. ON DECEMBER 2005 THE CAR STARTED RUNNING WRONG WAS TURNING OFF SOME TIMES IN THE STREET AND FINALLY WAS BROKEN I HAD TO PAY TOW AND EVERYTHING TO FIX IT AND THE ENGINE FAILED. THE MECHANIC ASSUMED THAT THE CAR HAD OVERHEATED BUT I DIDN'T THINK SO. BECAUSE THE VEHICLE HAD BEEN USED JUST TO DO SHORT RUNS CLOSE TO MY HOUSE AND THE TEMPERATURE NEEDLE NEVER WENT UP AND IT WAS WORKING PROPERLY. ANY WAY I HAD TO PAY TO FIX THE PROBLEM AND THE DEALER SAID THAT EVERYTHING WAS WORKING PROPERLY, THE SENSOR WAS OK BUT TEN DAYS AFTER THE CHECK ENGINE LIGHT CAME BACK THE CAR IS STILL THERE. I DON'T DRIVE THE CAR MUCH BECAUSE I'M REALLY SCARED THAT SOMETHING MAY HAPPEN. WHEN I BOUGHT THE CAR IT HAD JUST 69530 MILES AND SINCE THEN I HAVE JUST DROVE LIKE 1500 MILES AT THE MOST.

NHTSA complaint #10158914 — an unverified report by a vehicle owner.

at 72,000 miles Hudson Falls, NY

AIR BAGS

DT*: THE CONTACT STATED A RECALL LETTER WAS RECEIVED SEPTEMBER 27, 2004 REGARDING THE AIRBAGS, #02V131001. THE LOCAL DEALERSHIP DOES NOT PERFORM RECALL WORK AND THE CUSTOMER SERVICE NUMBER FOR THE MANUFACTURER IS AN ANSWERING MACHINE. THEREFORE, THE CONTACT IS UNABLE TO HAVE THE RECALL WORK PERFORMED.

NHTSA complaint #10152756 — an unverified report by a vehicle owner.

LOS Angelos, CA

ENGINE AND ENGINE COOLING

DT: THE CONTACT OWNS A 1999 DAEWOO LANOS. THE CONTACT STATED THAT NHTSA CAMPAIGN RECALL 04V357000 FOR THE CAMSHAFT POSITION SENSOR WAS SUPPOSE TO HAVE BEEN CORRECTED, BUT SHE STATED THAT THE PROBLEM WAS NOT CORRECTED. SHE TOOK THE VEHICLE TO DEALER FOR SERVICE AND THREE DAYS LATER THE CHECK ENGINE LIGHT CAME BACK ON. THE DEALERSHIP BY THE RECALL WAS SUPPOSE TO HAVE INSTALLED AN ADDITIONAL FUSE. SHE CONTACTED THE DEALERSHIP BACK, THEY TOLD HER THAT SHE WOULD HAVE TO PAY TO HAVE THIS LOOKED INTO FURTHER. SHE GOT ONTO THE INTERNET AND SAW THAT OTHER PEOPLE HAD COMPLAINED ABOUT THE SAME TYPE OF PROBLEM ON ANOTHER WEBSITE. THE AIR BAG WARNING LIGHT STAYED ON ALL THE TIME AS WELL. THE CONTACT STATED THAT THIS REPAIR WORK WAS DONE ON FEBRUARY 2005. THE SERVICE INVOICES STATED THAT REPAIR WAS DONE FOR THE SENSOR, FUSE KIT, AND BODY ELECTRICAL RECALL (AIR BAG). ALSO, THE REPAIR INVOICE STATED THAT AIR BAG WARNING LIGHT WAS STILL ON AFTER RECALL REPAIRS. THEY TOLD HER THAT THEY COULD FURTHER INVESTIGATE IT AT CHARGE TO HER, BUT SHE DECLINED. THE SERVICE INVOICE PARTS WERE FIXED BOLTS AND NUTS, AND NEW AIR BAG KIT. THE MAIN RECALLS FOR ENGINE AND AIR BAG LIGHTS WERE STILL ON AFTER THE RECALL REPAIRS WERE PERFORMED. THE DEALERSHIP GAVE HER A TUNE UP CHARGING HER $2000.

NHTSA complaint #10137010 — an unverified report by a vehicle owner.

LOS Angelos, CA

AIR BAGS:FRONTAL:SENSOR/CONTROL MODULE

DT: THE CONTACT OWNS A 1999 DAEWOO LANOS. THE CONTACT STATED THAT NHTSA CAMPAIGN RECALL 04V357000 FOR THE CAMSHAFT POSITION SENSOR WAS SUPPOSE TO HAVE BEEN CORRECTED, BUT SHE STATED THAT THE PROBLEM WAS NOT CORRECTED. SHE TOOK THE VEHICLE TO DEALER FOR SERVICE AND THREE DAYS LATER THE CHECK ENGINE LIGHT CAME BACK ON. THE DEALERSHIP BY THE RECALL WAS SUPPOSE TO HAVE INSTALLED AN ADDITIONAL FUSE. SHE CONTACTED THE DEALERSHIP BACK, THEY TOLD HER THAT SHE WOULD HAVE TO PAY TO HAVE THIS LOOKED INTO FURTHER. SHE GOT ONTO THE INTERNET AND SAW THAT OTHER PEOPLE HAD COMPLAINED ABOUT THE SAME TYPE OF PROBLEM ON ANOTHER WEBSITE. THE AIR BAG WARNING LIGHT STAYED ON ALL THE TIME AS WELL. THE CONTACT STATED THAT THIS REPAIR WORK WAS DONE ON FEBRUARY 2005. THE SERVICE INVOICES STATED THAT REPAIR WAS DONE FOR THE SENSOR, FUSE KIT, AND BODY ELECTRICAL RECALL (AIR BAG). ALSO, THE REPAIR INVOICE STATED THAT AIR BAG WARNING LIGHT WAS STILL ON AFTER RECALL REPAIRS. THEY TOLD HER THAT THEY COULD FURTHER INVESTIGATE IT AT CHARGE TO HER, BUT SHE DECLINED. THE SERVICE INVOICE PARTS WERE FIXED BOLTS AND NUTS, AND NEW AIR BAG KIT. THE MAIN RECALLS FOR ENGINE AND AIR BAG LIGHTS WERE STILL ON AFTER THE RECALL REPAIRS WERE PERFORMED. THE DEALERSHIP GAVE HER A TUNE UP CHARGING HER $2000.

NHTSA complaint #10137010 — an unverified report by a vehicle owner.

at 62,000 miles Winchester, KY

ENGINE AND ENGINE COOLING:ENGINE

DT: THE CONSUMER STATED 1999 DAEWOO LINOS IS HAVING PROBLEMS WITH THE ENGINE LIGHT COMING ON, MISSING AND STALLING. THE CAR STALLED WHILE DRIVING. SPEED WAS NOT A FACTOR IN THE STALLING. THE CONSUMER TOOK THE CAR TO THE SHOP 12 TIMES FOR THE ENGINE LIGHT STAYING ON, AND THAT WAS AT 2 DIFFERENT DEALERSHIPS. THE LIGHT HAS BEEN GOING ON AND OFF FOR THREE YEARS. SHE WOULD TAKE THE CAR IN FOR SERVICE AND THE DEALER WOULD RESET THE ENGINE AND LATER THE LIGHT WOULD COME BACK ON. THE OWNER HAS EVEN HAD THE CAR IN THE SHOP 3 TIMES IN ONE DAY. THE OWNER HAS CONTACTED DAEWOO AND THEY SENT A LETTER TO HAVE HER SENSOR REPLACED. THE CENSOR WAS REPLACED AND THE LIGHT CAME BACK ON A WEEK LATER. THE DEALER REPLACED THE MUFFLER. THE LIGHT WENT BACK OFF, AND WEEK LATER IT WAS BACK ON. THE CAR I WAS NOT UNDER WARRANTY. DAEWOO TOLD THE CONSUMER NOT TO WORRY ABOUT THE WARRANTY RUNNING OUT BECAUSE SHE HAD A PROBLEM WITH THE CAR. THE DEALERSHIP TOLD THE CONSUMER NOT TO BRING THE CAR BACK BECAUSE THEY DID NOT KNOW WHAT WAS WRONG. THE LIGHT WAS STILL ON . THE CONSUMER WAS AFRAID TO DRIVE THE CAR BECAUSE OF THE LIGHT STAYING ON. *AK UPDATED 1/5/2006 -

NHTSA complaint #10133500 — an unverified report by a vehicle owner.

Westwood, OH

SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC:FOUNDATION COMPONENTS:HOSES, LINES/PIPING, AND FITTINGS

CONSUMER RECEIVED RECALL 02V257001 CONCERNING BRAKE HOSE. DEALER WAS NOT IN OPERATION.

NHTSA complaint #10099000 — an unverified report by a vehicle owner.

Duluth, GA Fire

ENGINE AND ENGINE COOLING:ENGINE:GASOLINE

THIS AUTO WAS DESTROYED BY AN ENGINE FIRE. BECAUSE THE MANUFACTURER CANNOT DETERMINE THE CAUSE OF THE FIRE, IT STATES THAT IT WILL NOT HONOR ITS WARRANTY. WE FEEL THAT THERE IS A SAFETY PROBLEM OR DEFECT THAT SHOULD BE INVESTIGATED AS CAUSE OF THIS FIRE.

NHTSA complaint #754454 — an unverified report by a vehicle owner.