FaultScore

1991 Ford Taurus body problems

62 of the 946 complaints about the 1991 Ford Taurus are about the body and structure — 7% of everything reported for this model year. Half of the failures with a mileage on record happened before 112,500 miles.

A

62

Complaints

2

Crashes

0

Fires

0

Injuries

Exactly what failed

Frame AND Members 51 82.3%
Body 5 8.1%
Door 3 4.8%
Structure 2 3.2%
Hinge AND Attachments 1 1.6%

Body & Structure across every Ford Taurus year

1986 18 1.7%
1987 34 3.2%
1988 53 5.0%
1989 67 6.4%
1990 70 6.7%
1991 62 5.9%
1992 73 7.0%
1993 71 6.8%
1994 72 6.9%
1995 61 5.8%
1996 48 4.6%
1997 25 2.4%
1998 23 2.2%
1999 19 1.8%
2000 34 3.2%
2001 40 3.8%
2002 54 5.1%
2003 111 10.6%
2004 17 1.6%
2005 22 2.1%
2006 15 1.4%
2010 11 1.0%
2011 12 1.1%
2012 16 1.5%
2013 12 1.1%
2018 10 1.0%

What owners said

Filed with NHTSA, in their own words.

at 125,000 miles Omaha, NE

STRUCTURE:FRAME AND MEMBERS

I WAS ADVISED BY A MECHANIC RECENTLY THAT MY VEHICLE WAS UNSAFE. HE SHOWED ME THE REAR SUBFRAME BOLT THAT WAS DETERIORATED TO ABOUT HALF OF ITS ORIGINAL SIZE AND THAT THE SUBFRAME WAS RUSTED HEAVILY AND CRACKED COMPLETELY THROUGH. THIS WAS AFTER THE RECALL WAS DONE ON MY VEHICLE IN 1999 FOR NHTSA ARTICLE NO. 98V323000. SO THE WORK THAT WAS DONE TO KEEP THE SUBFRAME FROM FALLING IS NOT HOLDING UP AND IT APPEARS THAT IT COULD BREAK SOON.

NHTSA complaint #10132884 — an unverified report by a vehicle owner.

Providence, RI

STRUCTURE:FRAME AND MEMBERS

I WAS NOTIFIED BY MY MECHANIC THAT MY 1991 TAURUS-STATION WAGON HAD A RECALL REGARDING THE SUB-FRAME. HE SUGGESTED I CALL RIZZO-FORD IN NO. PROVIDENCE, R.I. ON MINERAL SPRING AVE. WHEN I CALLED I SPOKE TO REPRESENTATIVE RICK MARRCONTE AND HE AGREED THAT THERE WAS A RECALL AND HE WOULD FIX MY CAR, BRING IT IN HE SAID. A FEW DAYS LATER RICK CALLS ME BACK TO INFORM ME THAT NOT ONLY THE NUT OF THE SUBFRAME WAS ROTTED, BUT ALSO THE SUBFRAME ITSELF WAS ROTTED AND IT WOULD COST $900.00 TO FIX AND HE TOLD ME MY CAR WAS NOT WORTH IT. TO MAKE A LONG STORY SHORT, I PLAYED PHONE TAG WITH THE FORD MOTOR COMPANY HOT LINE WHICH SEEMED LIKE FOREVER. A SHEILA INFORMED ME THAT THEY WERE WILLING TO PAY FOR THE REPAIR IF THE COMPANY AGREED TO REPAIR IT. SHE LATER EXPLAINED THEY REFUSED TO FIX MY CAR. THIS FAULT IN MY CAR ALMOST HAD ME AND MY 6 YEAR OLD GRANDSON IN AN ACCIDENT. WHEN I TOLD THE WOMAN SHEILA THIS SHE EXPLAINED TO ME THAT I SHOULD HAVE KNOWN WHEN BUYING THIS CAR THAT I SHOULD HAVE CALLED TO FIND OUT ABOUT THE RECALLS. THIS I DO NOT UNDERSTAND...SHE WANTED ME TO CALL AND FIND OUT IF MY CAR WAS A 'LEMON'? NOW BECAUSE THIS DEALERSHIP REFUSED TO HELP ME IT NOW MAKES IT DIFFICULT FOR ME TO PERHAPS GO TO ANOTHER FORD DEALERSHIP THAT MAY HAVE BE ABLE TO HELP ME. I AM A STUDENT @ URI/CCE, ALSO WORKING, AND TAKING CARE OF MY 80 YEAR OLD FATHER. PRIOR TO THIS DAMAGE I HAD JUST FIX THIS CAR FOR $750.00, WHICH I COULD NOT AFFORD IN THE FIRST PLACE. THIS APPEARS TO BE DISHONEST AND A WAY TO GET PEOPLE TO GIVE FORD EVEN MORE MONEY TOWARDS THEIR 'DAMAGING POOL'. IS THERE ANY RECOURSE I CAN TAKE? PLEASE ADVICE. MARIA D. O'CONNOR

NHTSA complaint #10079121 — an unverified report by a vehicle owner.

Rutherford, NJ

STRUCTURE:BODY

AFTER THE RECOMMENDED 1 YEAR WAIT FOR WAXING, I DECIDED SINCE THE MILD WASHINGS WERE CONTINUING TO MAKE THE CAR DULLER I WOULD GIVE IT A SHINE. IT WAS BAD ENOUGH THAT PAINT CONTINUED TO COME OFF WHEN DRYING REGULARLY BUT I WAS MORTIFIED WHEN I TESTED AN AREA AND IT LOOKED LIKE WATER COLORS WERE USED AS PAINT. AFTER ALL THESE YEARS, I HAVE CALLED FORD SEVERAL TIMES WITH NO LUCK. ON ONE OCCASION A UNDISCLOSED PERSON SAID IT SOUNDED LIKE THERE WAS NOT ENOUGH OR NO CLEAR COAT AND I SHOULD TAKE IT TO WHERE I PURCHASED IT AND HAVE THEM LOOK AT IT. SO LUCKILY THE STADIUM AUTOMALL IN RUTHERFORD IS DIRECTLY ACROSS THE STREET FROM WHERE I LIVE. THIS IS ALSO WHERE I PURCHASED IT 13 YEARS AGO. THE MAN ADMITTED IT WAS DULL AND A GOOD WAXING PROFESSIONALLY WOULD HELP. I TOLD HIM I WOULD BE TO EMBARASSED BECAUSE THE PAINT COMES OFF EVEN WHEN I DRY IT AFTER A WASHING. HE NEVER CHECKED IF THEY WERE HAVING PROBLEMS AND TOLD ME THERE WAS NOTHING THEY WOULD DO ABOUT IT.I MUST POINT OUT WE ARE AVID FORD BUYERS AND MY HUSBANDS 10 YEAR OLD TRUCK WAS RE-PAINTED FROM THE SAME PROBLEM. ALSO AS THE ORIGINAL OWNER THE RECALLS LISTED IN YOUR WEB PAGE ON MY VEHICLE WERE ONLY ONCE REPORTED TO ME. THAT THE WAS THE CHILD SAFETY CATCH. JUST RECENTLY MY TIE-ROD SNAPPED ON RT.3 IN SECAUCUS, N.J. LUCKILY FOR ME I AM STILL ALIVE TO WRITE TO YOU. P.S. THE OTHER THINGS SUCH AS ROTORS EXCETERA HAVE ALSO BEEN DONE AT MY EXPENSE. MY CAR ONLY JUST CLICKED OVR 89,000 MILES FOR GOODNESS SAKE. THIS IS THE BEST WEBSITE!! EVEN IF NOTHING COMES OUT OF IT.

NHTSA complaint #10073011 — an unverified report by a vehicle owner.

at 93,858 miles Fargo, ND

STRUCTURE:FRAME AND MEMBERS

WHILE DRIVING A LOUD NOISE WAS HEARD AND THE STEERING WHEEL LOCKED. VEHICLE WAS TOWED TO AN INDEPENDENT MECHANIC, WHO STATED THE CRADLE MOUNTING WASHER AND BOLTS RUSTED. DEALER INSTALLED SUB FRAMES REAR MOUNT BOLTS, REINFORCEMENT PLATES AND REPLACED NUTS. *AK *CB

NHTSA complaint #10022774 — an unverified report by a vehicle owner.

at 136,000 miles Mount Vernon, OH

STRUCTURE:FRAME AND MEMBERS

AFTER THE RECALL FOR THE REAR LOWER SUBFRAME MOUNT WAS PERFORMED, THE PROBLEM RECURRED.

NHTSA complaint #10006862 — an unverified report by a vehicle owner.

Revere, MA

STRUCTURE:FRAME AND MEMBERS

AFTER THE DEALERSHIP STONE HAM FORD,STONE HAM MASS, PERFORMED THE RECALL FOR THE SUBFRAME CORROSION 98 V 323 000, THE PROBLEM REOCCURRED.

NHTSA complaint #10003624 — an unverified report by a vehicle owner.

at 100,000 miles Muncie, IN Crash

STRUCTURE

THE CONSUMER STATES THAT THE CARRIAGE BOLT HAD BROKEN, CAUSING THE FRAME TO DROP DOWN ON THE STEERING, CAUSING A LOSS OF STEERING. MR RECALL#93V106002 SCC

NHTSA complaint #8020947 — an unverified report by a vehicle owner.

Louisville, KY

STRUCTURE:FRAME AND MEMBERS

THERE IS A PROBLEM WITH THE PASSENGER SIDE REAR SUBFRAME MOUNTING BOLT. ALLEGEDLY RECALL 98V323000 RELATING TO THE MOUNT WAS PERFORMED. HOWEVER CONSUMER WAS INFORMED THAT NO PREVIOUS REPAIR WORK HAD BEEN DONE ON THE PASSSENGER SIDE REAR SUBFRAME MOUNTING PLATE. CONSEQUENCES OF THE BOLT MOUNTING PLATE FAILURE IS THAT THE DROP IN THE SUBFRAME FROM THE BODY HAS ALLOWED OTHER DAMAGE TO THE PULLEYS AND SERPENTINE BELT. RECALL NOTICE 92M77 RELATING TO THE ENGINE MOUNT FAILED AND HAD TO BE REPLACED.

NHTSA complaint #566923 — an unverified report by a vehicle owner.

Baltimore, MD

STRUCTURE:FRAME AND MEMBERS

RECALL ON SUBFRAME WAS DONE IN FEBRUARY 1999, AT THIS TIME SUBFRAME IS DETACHING FROM THE BODY ON DRIVERS SIDE OF VEHICLE.*AK CONSUMER STATED THAT FRONT MOTOR MOUNT WAS REPLACED TWICE. ALSO FRONT PASSENGERS CV AXLE WAS REPLACED TWICE.

NHTSA complaint #8010623 — an unverified report by a vehicle owner.

Haleyville, AL

STRUCTURE:FRAME AND MEMBERS

REAR SUBFRAME BOLTS HAD CORRODED. THIS CAUSED THE FRAME TO DROP. PROBLEM HAPPENED WHILE PULLING AWAY FROM FUEL PUMP. NO RECALLS.

NHTSA complaint #890252 — an unverified report by a vehicle owner.

Peterborough, NH

STRUCTURE:BODY

BODY HAS SEPARATED FROM FRAME, THERE IS A RECALL 98V323000, BUT THIS VEHICLE IS NOT AFFECTED.

NHTSA complaint #889817 — an unverified report by a vehicle owner.

Harrisonburg, VA

STRUCTURE:BODY:DOOR:HINGE AND ATTACHMENTS

DRIVER'S SIDE DOOR STRICKER CAME LOSE, STRICKER HAS BEEN REPLACED. CJ

NHTSA complaint #559677 — an unverified report by a vehicle owner.

Indianapolis, IN

STRUCTURE:FRAME AND MEMBERS

SUBFRAME TO BODY MOUNT BOLTS REPEATEDLY BECAME CORRODED AND RUST OUT. CONSUMER HAS HAD TO REPLACE SUBFRAME S ON ALL THREE OF FORD, TAURUS NO ACCIDENT HAS OCCURRED. HOWEVER ,THIS DEFECT COULD RESULT IN LOSS OF CONTROL. (VIN #'S FOR VEHICLES: [XXX], [XXX], AND [XXX].) PLEASE PROVIDE ANY ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. *AK INFORMATION REDACTED PURSUANT TO THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 552(B)(6).

NHTSA complaint #881019 — an unverified report by a vehicle owner.

Harvey, LA

STRUCTURE:FRAME AND MEMBERS

WHEN DRIVING AT ANY SPEED THE MOTOR IS RACING. ALSO, THERE IS SOME KNOCKING AND RATTLING NOISE COMING FROM THE VEHICLE. WHEN SHIFTING GEARS THERE IS A LOUD NOISE. CONSUMER HAD THE SUBFRAME REPLACED.

NHTSA complaint #851687 — an unverified report by a vehicle owner.

Wauatonsa, WI Crash

STRUCTURE:FRAME AND MEMBERS

WHILE DRIVING AT 25 MPH THE SUBFRAME DROP FROM UNDER THE VEHICLE CAUSING NO STEERING ABILITY WHICH RESULTED IN VEHICLE HITTING A POLE.

NHTSA complaint #851514 — an unverified report by a vehicle owner.

Milltown, NJ

STRUCTURE:FRAME AND MEMBERS

CONSUMER WAS SENT RECALL NOTICE 98V323. CONTACTED THE DEALER, DEALER STATED VEHICLE WAS NOT INCLUDED IN THE RECALL, AND REFUSED TO CORRECT THE PROBLEM. PLEASE PROVIDE ANY FURTHER DETAILS.

NHTSA complaint #851090 — an unverified report by a vehicle owner.

DE Pere, WI

STRUCTURE:FRAME AND MEMBERS

MOTOR MOUNT REPLACED THREE TIMES AND TRANSMISSION IS IN NEED OF REPLACEMENT, POSSIBLE RECALL RELATED FAILURES (RECALL COMPONENT- BODY MOUNTS) ALL REPLACEMENT AND FAILURES OCCURRED PRIOR TO NOTICE. MJS

NHTSA complaint #513238 — an unverified report by a vehicle owner.

Andover, MN

STRUCTURE:FRAME AND MEMBERS

VEHICLE EXPERIENCED FAILURE OF THE RECALL COMPONENT PRIOR TO RECALL NOTICE (98V-323). MJS

NHTSA complaint #548036 — an unverified report by a vehicle owner.

West Allis, WI

STRUCTURE:FRAME AND MEMBERS

WHILE DRIVING AT 25 MPH AND WITHOUT NO PRIOR WARNING, SUBFRAME FELL OFF FROM UNDER THE VEHICLE, AND THE STEERING BECAME VERY DIFFICULT WHICH AFFECTED THE CONTROL OF THE VEHICLE. ALSO, THERE WAS SOME TYPE OF GRINDING NOISE AND VIBRATION WITHIN THE STEERING.

NHTSA complaint #847887 — an unverified report by a vehicle owner.

Dubuque, IA

STRUCTURE:FRAME AND MEMBERS

RECEIVED RECALL 98V323000. CONTACTED DEALER & TOOK VEHICLE IN ON APPOINTED DAY. REPAIRS WERE DONE. AFTER RECEIVING VEHICLE, THE RECALL REMEDY FAILED ON SUBFRAME. THE FRAME WOULD SHIFT & MAKE NOISE. WOULD BEND STEERING WHEN MAKING SHARP TURNS.AK

NHTSA complaint #846941 — an unverified report by a vehicle owner.

Belmore, NY

STRUCTURE:FRAME AND MEMBERS

WHILE DRIVING AT 30 MPH THERE WAS SOME TYPE OF KNOCKING NOISE COMING FROM UNDER THE VEHICLE, AND THERE WAS A VIBRATION WITHIN THE STEERING. CONSUMER TOOK THE VEHICLE IN FOR THE RECALL REPAIRS. HOWEVER, WHEN DRIVING THE VEHICLE AFTER THE RECALL REPAIR WORK WAS DONE, THE PROBLEM STARTED AGAIN. RECALL 93V106.002.

NHTSA complaint #846967 — an unverified report by a vehicle owner.

Oregon, WI

STRUCTURE:FRAME AND MEMBERS

THE FRONT MOTOR MOUNTS BROKE. ALSO, REAR SUB-FRAME MOUNTS ARE SHEARING OFF. THE DEALER AND MANUFACTURER HAVE BEEN NOTIFIED.

NHTSA complaint #844135 — an unverified report by a vehicle owner.

Woodbridge, VA

STRUCTURE:FRAME AND MEMBERS

NHTSA RECALL 98V323/ MANUFACTURER'S RECALL 98S36. REAR SUBFRAME CORROSION. WHEN DRIVING THERE WAS A BANGING, AND THE FRONT END SHOOK. FRONT SUBFRAME CORROSION IS EXACTLY LIKE THE REAR PROBLEM. DEALER CONTACTED AND COULD REMEDY THE PROBLEM. THE PROBLEM STILL EXISTS. PROVIDE FURTHER INFORMATION.

NHTSA complaint #842628 — an unverified report by a vehicle owner.

Mounds, OK

STRUCTURE:FRAME AND MEMBERS

VEHICLE WAS EXPERIENCING CORROSION AROUND THE SUBFRAME MOUNTS. THE BRACKETS NEEDED REPLACING ON THE SUBRAME, RECALL 98V323000. VEHICLE WAS NOT UNDER RECALL DUE TO VIN, BUT HAS THE SAME PROBLEMS.

NHTSA complaint #838847 — an unverified report by a vehicle owner.

Mountaon TOP, PA

STRUCTURE:FRAME AND MEMBERS

FRONT BOLTS AND MOUNTS HAVE RUSTED. A RECALL WAS ISSUED ON THE REAR BOLTS. THE MANUFACTURER HAS BEEN NOTIFIED.

NHTSA complaint #838430 — an unverified report by a vehicle owner.

NEW Milfor, NJ

STRUCTURE:FRAME AND MEMBERS

RECALL REPAIR WORK ON THE BODY MOUNTS REFUSED DUE TO LACK OF PARTS. (98V-323).MJS

NHTSA complaint #545183 — an unverified report by a vehicle owner.

Lynbrook, NY

STRUCTURE:FRAME AND MEMBERS

CONSUMER WAS DRIVING APPROXIMATELY 15MPH WHEN VEHICLE LOST POWER, VEHICLE WOULD NOT MOVE, ALTHOUGH THE ENGINE WAS STILL RUNNING ON AN INCLINE. THERE WAS A BULLETIN 94-M84-AX4S FOR THE TRANSAXLE CONSUMER RECEIVED A RECALL NOTICE. DEALERSHIP LOOKED AT VEHICLE, AND SAID THERE WAS NO PROBLEM, IN WARRANTY, 14.000 MILES LATER PROBLEM OCCURRED. RECALL 93V106.

NHTSA complaint #836894 — an unverified report by a vehicle owner.

Whiting, IN

STRUCTURE

THE REAR MOUNTING PLATE HAD CORRODED/RUSTED. THIS CAUSED THE SUSPENSION TO GO THROUGH THE BODY OF THE VEHICLE.

NHTSA complaint #836896 — an unverified report by a vehicle owner.

Brooklyn, NY

STRUCTURE:FRAME AND MEMBERS

RECALL 98S36 (REAR LOWER SUBFRAME MOUNT PLATE NUT) NOT PERFORMED IN A TIMELY MANNER DUE TO DEALER SCHEDULING.

NHTSA complaint #544695 — an unverified report by a vehicle owner.

Browns Town, MI

STRUCTURE:FRAME AND MEMBERS

SUBFRAME MOUNT/CRADLE BOLTS/CORRODED/FAILED, CAUSING CRADLE TO DROP PRIOR TO RECALL NOTIFICATION, CAUSED STEERING TO LOCK UP, ALSO DAMAGED TRANSMISSION WHICH LATER HAD TO BE REPLACED. (98V-323)

NHTSA complaint #544603 — an unverified report by a vehicle owner.

Other 1991 Ford Taurus problems

← Full 1991 Ford Taurus report