FaultScore

FaultScore report

2023 Mercedes Benz EQB 300 4MATIC problems

Owners have filed 74 complaints about the 2023 Mercedes Benz EQB 300 4MATIC with NHTSA between 2023 and 2026. The largest single group is the electrical system. Across this model's run it ranks 1 of 3 worst.

D

FaultScore 65/100

Higher is worse. Measured against the other years of the Mercedes Benz EQB 300 4MATIC.

How this is worked out

The numbers

74

Complaints

1

Crashes reported

0

Fires reported

0

Injuries reported

What kind of bad

The letter says how bad. This says what kind — whether this year drew an unusual number of complaints, unusually dangerous ones, or failures that arrived unusually early.

Complaint volume 100 vs 50 Severity 7 vs 50 Early failure not reported
The dashed ring is 50 — the national norm. Further out is worse.
Complaint volume — 100
Against the median year of the Mercedes Benz EQB 300 4MATIC. 50 means typical for this model; 100 means roughly double.
Severity — 7
1.4% of these complaints involved a crash, fire, injury or death, against a national rate of 9.7%.
Early failure — not reported
Too few complaints recorded a mileage to measure this.

How 2023 compares with every other Mercedes Benz EQB 300 4MATIC

Click any bar to open that year's report.

Complaints filed with NHTSA, by model year. Bar colour is the FaultScore grade: A B C D F ungraded

What breaks on a 2023 Mercedes Benz EQB 300 4MATIC

Every complaint is filed against a part. Follow any row for the complaints about that part alone.

Median failure at 10,000 miles

Fuel & Propulsion 9 12.2%
Other & Unspecified 8 10.8%
Engine & Cooling 6 8.1%
Driver Assist & Collision Avoidance 5 6.8%
Transmission & Drivetrain 4 5.4%
Brakes 2 2.7%

1 crashes, 0 fires · median 20,000 mi

Seat Belts 1 1.4%
Wheels 1 1.4%
Windows, Mirrors & Wipers 1 1.4%
Airbags 1 1.4%

When owners complained

A spike years after the car went on sale usually means a part wearing out on schedule across the whole fleet — the kind of pattern no single owner can see from inside their own car.

Nov 2023 peak 16 Aug 2026

Complaints that involved harm

Reports where the owner recorded a crash, a fire, an injury or a death.

at 20,000 miles Beverly Hills, CA Crash

SERVICE BRAKES

The contact owns a 2023 Mercedes-Benz EQB 300. The contact stated that his wife was parking inside the garage, and the brake pedal was depressed she felt the brake pedal was vibrating, and the vehicle then accelerated independently. The contact stated that after several times depressing the brake pedal, the vehicle was able to come to a stop. It was unknown if the warning lights illuminated. On a separate occasion, the contact was driving at 5 MPH coming to a stop, the brake pedal was released and felt abnormal vibration; the vehicle then accelerated independently. The vehicle jumped the curb and crashed into a tree trunk where it came to a stop. The driver’s and passenger’s side air bags did not deploy. The contact was unsure if there was a warning light illuminated on that occasion. A police report was not filed. There were no injuries sustained. The vehicle was towed to the dealer. The vehicle was not diagnosed or repaired. The insurance company was not contacted. The manufacturer was notified of the failure and advised the contact that a case manager would be reaching out. The contact stated that a chemical odor was emitting from the engine weeks before the incident. The failure mileage was 20,000.

NHTSA complaint #11641405 — an unverified report by a vehicle owner.

The most recent complaints

In the owners' own words, exactly as filed with NHTSA.

Celina, TX

UNKNOWN OR OTHER

Vehicle: 2023 Mercedes‑Benz EQB VIN: [XXX] MBUSA Case #: XXX NHTSA Recall #: 26V073000 Mercedes‑Benz USA has mishandled recall 26V073000 (fire hazard) and left me without transportation. I was told the vehicle is unsafe to drive, which has caused significant anxiety, panic attacks, and ongoing stress because I have no safe way to commute or manage daily responsibilities. MBUSA repeatedly promised a loaner vehicle, but the dealership stated they were never contacted, had no instructions, and had no loaner available. MBUSA later said I could receive a rental car “upon eligible dealership,” but they did not specify which dealership, and after calling multiple Mercedes‑Benz locations, all confirmed they had no information, no authorization, and no process for rental reimbursement or recall support. MBUSA has provided conflicting and misleading information, failed to coordinate with dealerships, and failed to provide transportation during a fire‑hazard recall. This has caused loss of use, mental distress, and safety exposure. I request investigation into MBUSA for failure to properly administer recall 26V073000, failure to provide transportation during a safety recall, and misrepresentation of recall remedies. Complainant: [XXX] [XXX] [XXX] [XXX] INFORMATION REDACTED PURSUANT TO THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 552(B)(6)

NHTSA complaint #11756741 — an unverified report by a vehicle owner.

Denville, NJ

ELECTRICAL SYSTEM

See attached document for complaint.

NHTSA complaint #11752312 — an unverified report by a vehicle owner.

Atlanta, GA

ELECTRICAL SYSTEM

There is a recall associated with this model that causes catastrophic stoppage without any ability to drive. My vehicle VIN does not have a recall according to your site. Despite this, my vehicle catastrophically stopped multiple times. It was repaired at least three times and still stopped in the middle of the highway. My partner and I were stopped on I-85S with no ability to move, honk, put on hazards. Cars zoomed past at full speed. I called 911 as we braced for impact. We are lucky to be alive and now suffer from severe trauma. They eventually closed the entire highway and dragged the vehicle to the shoulder almost 30 min later. Mbusa was aware of this defect before rejecting my lemon law claim, but my vehicle was not included apparently. I feel more investigation is needed because it seems very likely my vehicle should be included in the recall. I appreciate your attention to this matter.

NHTSA complaint #11751342 — an unverified report by a vehicle owner.

Atlanta, GA

ENGINE

There is a recall associated with this model that causes catastrophic stoppage without any ability to drive. My vehicle VIN does not have a recall according to your site. Despite this, my vehicle catastrophically stopped multiple times. It was repaired at least three times and still stopped in the middle of the highway. My partner and I were stopped on I-85S with no ability to move, honk, put on hazards. Cars zoomed past at full speed. I called 911 as we braced for impact. We are lucky to be alive and now suffer from severe trauma. They eventually closed the entire highway and dragged the vehicle to the shoulder almost 30 min later. Mbusa was aware of this defect before rejecting my lemon law claim, but my vehicle was not included apparently. I feel more investigation is needed because it seems very likely my vehicle should be included in the recall. I appreciate your attention to this matter.

NHTSA complaint #11751342 — an unverified report by a vehicle owner.

Atlanta, GA

FUEL/PROPULSION SYSTEM

There is a recall associated with this model that causes catastrophic stoppage without any ability to drive. My vehicle VIN does not have a recall according to your site. Despite this, my vehicle catastrophically stopped multiple times. It was repaired at least three times and still stopped in the middle of the highway. My partner and I were stopped on I-85S with no ability to move, honk, put on hazards. Cars zoomed past at full speed. I called 911 as we braced for impact. We are lucky to be alive and now suffer from severe trauma. They eventually closed the entire highway and dragged the vehicle to the shoulder almost 30 min later. Mbusa was aware of this defect before rejecting my lemon law claim, but my vehicle was not included apparently. I feel more investigation is needed because it seems very likely my vehicle should be included in the recall. I appreciate your attention to this matter.

NHTSA complaint #11751342 — an unverified report by a vehicle owner.

Atlanta, GA

ELECTRICAL SYSTEM

The contact owns a 2023 Mercedes-Benz EQB 300 4Matic. The contact received notification of NHTSA Campaign Number: 26V073000 (Electrical System); however, the part to do the recall repair was not yet available. The dealer was contacted. The contact was concerned that the manufacturer provided limited safety risk information and that the vehicle could catch on fire during a crash. The contact stated that the manufacturer had exceeded a reasonable amount of time for the recall repair. The manufacturer was contacted several times about the issue. The contact had not experienced a failure.

NHTSA complaint #11750608 — an unverified report by a vehicle owner.

Pikesville, MD

ELECTRICAL SYSTEM

See attached document for complaint.

NHTSA complaint #11747352 — an unverified report by a vehicle owner.

Narrowsburg, NY

FUEL/PROPULSION SYSTEM

My 2023 Mercedes-Benz EQB is included in the high-voltage battery fire recall (NHTSA campaign 26V073). The recall states the battery cells may fail internally at a high state of charge, causing an internal short circuit and a potential fire whether the vehicle is parked or being driven, with no advance warning while parked. As interim safety measures, Mercedes-Benz instructed me to limit charging to 80% and to park the vehicle outdoors, away from structures. These restrictions materially impair the vehicle's use: I cannot charge to full capacity and cannot park in my garage due to the fire risk to my home. The permanent remedy is replacement of the high-voltage battery pack. However, my Mercedes-Benz dealer has informed me that the replacement parts will not be available until 2027. That means I am being asked to operate a vehicle with an acknowledged fire risk, under charging and parking restrictions, for roughly 18 months or more, with no remedy currently available. I am requesting that NHTSA document this lack of an available remedy and the extended timeline. A delay of this length leaves owners exposed to the safety defect the recall was issued to address.

NHTSA complaint #11744240 — an unverified report by a vehicle owner.

Reseda, CA

ELECTRICAL SYSTEM

I am reporting a significant safety concern regarding my 2023 Mercedes-Benz EQB. While my specific VIN has not been included in the current high-voltage battery fire risk recall (NHTSA Campaign 26V073000), my vehicle is a 2023 model that shares the identical high-voltage battery architecture, manufacturing window, and platform design as the approximately 12,000 EQB vehicles officially recalled due to an internal defect that causes sudden, unpredictable battery fires. As a vehicle owner, I am now experiencing deep, well-founded anxiety regarding the safety of this vehicle. Due to the proximity of my vehicle's design to those definitively identified as defective, I have lost confidence in the vehicle's safe operation. I can no longer park this vehicle in an enclosed garage or charge it with confidence, effectively limiting my ability to utilize the vehicle as intended. I am filing this report to formally document my concern that this safety defect may be more widespread than the current recall population suggests, posing an unreasonable risk to the safety of myself and the public.

NHTSA complaint #11742099 — an unverified report by a vehicle owner.

Reseda, CA

ENGINE

I am reporting a significant safety concern regarding my 2023 Mercedes-Benz EQB. While my specific VIN has not been included in the current high-voltage battery fire risk recall (NHTSA Campaign 26V073000), my vehicle is a 2023 model that shares the identical high-voltage battery architecture, manufacturing window, and platform design as the approximately 12,000 EQB vehicles officially recalled due to an internal defect that causes sudden, unpredictable battery fires. As a vehicle owner, I am now experiencing deep, well-founded anxiety regarding the safety of this vehicle. Due to the proximity of my vehicle's design to those definitively identified as defective, I have lost confidence in the vehicle's safe operation. I can no longer park this vehicle in an enclosed garage or charge it with confidence, effectively limiting my ability to utilize the vehicle as intended. I am filing this report to formally document my concern that this safety defect may be more widespread than the current recall population suggests, posing an unreasonable risk to the safety of myself and the public.

NHTSA complaint #11742099 — an unverified report by a vehicle owner.

Short Hills, NJ

FUEL/PROPULSION SYSTEM

MB recall is since Feb 2026 and they neither ready to fix it not ready to provide a proper compensation . The vehicle is currently unusable for the following reasons: 1. Safety Catch-22 (Fire vs. Theft): Due to the fire hazard associated with the current battery recall, I cannot safely charge or store the vehicle in my garage. However, the local Township Police have explicitly advised against keeping the car outside due to high theft risks in the area. Mercedes-Benz has essentially provided a vehicle that is neither safe to keep indoors nor secure to keep outdoors. 2. Home Charging Restrictions: I typically charge the vehicle at night; however, the current recall guidelines necessitate monitoring the charge to ensure it does not exceed 80%. I have no practical way to monitor this throughout the night, making home charging a safety liability. Public Infrastructure Failure: The EVgo charging network has blocked the Mercedes-Benz EQB model from their network due to these safety concerns. This further eliminates my ability to use the vehicle for standard commuting or travel. 3. Lack of Support and Loaner Access: Despite these documented safety risks, my local Mercedes-Benz dealer has refused to provide a loaner vehicle, stating they are awaiting specific instructions from corporate. This leaves me without a safe mode of transportation while I continue to pay for a vehicle I cannot use. 4. Financial Loss: I am currently paying monthly insurance premiums of approx $300, car payments of $529, and have recently invested in new tires for a vehicle (~$1200) that is sitting idle. I am incurring the full cost of ownership for a product that fails to meet basic safety and utility standards. I need NHTSA to help me here as MB is not able to honor its federal mandate

NHTSA complaint #11741394 — an unverified report by a vehicle owner.

Seattle, WA

FUEL/PROPULSION SYSTEM

I received an Important Safety Recall notice (NHTSA Recall ID: 26V073) from Mercedes-Benz USA in March 2026 regarding my 2024 EQB (VIN: [XXX] ). The notice states that the high-voltage battery may fail due to an internal short circuit, potentially causing a vehicle fire while parked or driving. No incident has occurred. This complaint is filed because no remedy is available and no timeline has been provided by the manufacturer. Mercedes-Benz has advised owners to limit charging to 80% and to park outside while awaiting battery replacement parts. This interim guidance creates an additional hardship: my vehicle is garaged in ZIP code 98119 (Seattle, WA), where property crime is documented at over 50% above the national average. The manufacturer's guidance forces me to expose a $55,000+ vehicle to elevated theft and vandalism risk indefinitely, through no fault of my own. I am requesting NHTSA pressure Mercedes-Benz to accelerate parts availability and provide affected owners with a loaner vehicle or covered parking reimbursement until the remedy is performed. INFORMATION REDACTED PURSUANT TO THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 552(B)(6)

NHTSA complaint #11739346 — an unverified report by a vehicle owner.

Tarpon Springs, FL

POWER TRAIN

I am requesting that my 2023 Mercedes‑Benz EQB be added to the recall associated with high‑voltage battery safety issues. My vehicle is exhibiting the same symptoms described in NHTSA Recall No. 26V073000, but my VIN is not currently included. I was instructed not to fully charge the vehicle and warned that it may pose a fire hazard if parked inside my garage. These warnings indicate a serious safety defect involving the high‑voltage battery system. The vehicle cannot be safely stored at my residence, and its normal operation is substantially impaired. The safety risk is significant: the vehicle may overheat or catch fire during charging or while parked. This creates a danger to occupants, nearby structures, and the public. The problem has been acknowledged by the manufacturer in communications but no permanent repair is available. The symptoms and restrictions match those described in the existing recall. I am requesting that NHTSA investigate and determine whether my vehicle should be added to the affected VIN list, as it appears to suffer from the same high‑voltage battery defect and presents the same safety hazards.

NHTSA complaint #11737954 — an unverified report by a vehicle owner.

Miami, FL

ELECTRICAL SYSTEM

Compounded Electrical Failures In addition to the battery defect, this specific vehicle has exhibited recurring electrical malfunctions, including: Total failure of the backup cameras and parking sensors. Intermittent failure of the HVAC system (Air Conditioning), critical in the Florida climate. Erratic Autonomous Braking: The vehicle has repeatedly engaged emergency braking while reversing without cause, nearly resulting in multiple collisions. Diminished Utility and Breach of Lease Expectations The "interim" instructions provided by Mercedes-Benz have fundamentally altered the vehicle’s functionality from the terms established at the start of my lease: Charge Limitation: The "MUST NOT exceed 80%" mandate reduces the vehicle's range and utility, failing to meet the deliverable of a fully functional EV. Parking Restrictions: The requirement to park outside for fear of a garage fire is an unreasonable burden that violates the expected use of a luxury vehicle. Failure to Remedy within a Reasonable Time (49 U.S.C. § 30120) Under the National Traffic and Motor Vehicle Safety Act, specifically 49 U.S.C. § 30120(c)(2), a manufacturer’s failure to remedy a defect within 60 days of a vehicle being presented or a notice being issued constitutes prima facie evidence of a failure to remedy within a reasonable time. The notice for Recall 26V073 was issued in March 2026. As of today, May 11, 2026, more than 60 days have passed without an actionable remedy or a definitive timeline for repair. There have been ZERO warnings or indications of the above mentioned.

NHTSA complaint #11736984 — an unverified report by a vehicle owner.

Raleigh, NC

ELECTRICAL SYSTEM

I received an official recall notice from Mercedes-Benz regarding my EQB due to a defect involving the high-voltage battery system. According to the recall notice, the battery may experience an internal failure that could potentially result in a fire while the vehicle is either parked or being driven. Mercedes-Benz has also advised owners to limit charging and park the vehicle outside due to the severity of the safety risk. At this time, Mercedes-Benz has not provided a permanent repair remedy or battery replacement. Because I no longer feel safe driving or storing the vehicle, I have left it at the dealership and am currently using a loaner vehicle while attempting to reach a fair and reasonable resolution with Mercedes-Benz. Given the serious safety concerns associated with this recall and the lack of an available repair, I do not believe the current offer being presented by Mercedes-Benz adequately resolves the situation. During my first conversation with Mercedes, I was clearly told that I had two options: trade into another lease or have Mercedes repurchase the vehicle at no cost to me. At no point during that initial conversation was I told that repurchase was unlikely or subject to higher-level approval. $7,500 does not address the core issue, which is that I am still left in a lease for a vehicle I do not feel safe driving or storing. This is fundamentally a safety and usability issue, not simply a financial inconvenience. I am simply asking Mercedes to stand behind its product and provide a reasonable resolution for a leased vehicle that has been deemed subject to a serious fire-risk recall without a current repair remedy.

NHTSA complaint #11737006 — an unverified report by a vehicle owner.

Miami, FL

FORWARD COLLISION AVOIDANCE: AUTOMATIC EMERGENCY BRAKING

Compounded Electrical Failures In addition to the battery defect, this specific vehicle has exhibited recurring electrical malfunctions, including: Total failure of the backup cameras and parking sensors. Intermittent failure of the HVAC system (Air Conditioning), critical in the Florida climate. Erratic Autonomous Braking: The vehicle has repeatedly engaged emergency braking while reversing without cause, nearly resulting in multiple collisions. Diminished Utility and Breach of Lease Expectations The "interim" instructions provided by Mercedes-Benz have fundamentally altered the vehicle’s functionality from the terms established at the start of my lease: Charge Limitation: The "MUST NOT exceed 80%" mandate reduces the vehicle's range and utility, failing to meet the deliverable of a fully functional EV. Parking Restrictions: The requirement to park outside for fear of a garage fire is an unreasonable burden that violates the expected use of a luxury vehicle. Failure to Remedy within a Reasonable Time (49 U.S.C. § 30120) Under the National Traffic and Motor Vehicle Safety Act, specifically 49 U.S.C. § 30120(c)(2), a manufacturer’s failure to remedy a defect within 60 days of a vehicle being presented or a notice being issued constitutes prima facie evidence of a failure to remedy within a reasonable time. The notice for Recall 26V073 was issued in March 2026. As of today, May 11, 2026, more than 60 days have passed without an actionable remedy or a definitive timeline for repair. There have been ZERO warnings or indications of the above mentioned.

NHTSA complaint #11736984 — an unverified report by a vehicle owner.

Miami, FL

BACK OVER PREVENTION: SENSING SYSTEM: CAMERA

Compounded Electrical Failures In addition to the battery defect, this specific vehicle has exhibited recurring electrical malfunctions, including: Total failure of the backup cameras and parking sensors. Intermittent failure of the HVAC system (Air Conditioning), critical in the Florida climate. Erratic Autonomous Braking: The vehicle has repeatedly engaged emergency braking while reversing without cause, nearly resulting in multiple collisions. Diminished Utility and Breach of Lease Expectations The "interim" instructions provided by Mercedes-Benz have fundamentally altered the vehicle’s functionality from the terms established at the start of my lease: Charge Limitation: The "MUST NOT exceed 80%" mandate reduces the vehicle's range and utility, failing to meet the deliverable of a fully functional EV. Parking Restrictions: The requirement to park outside for fear of a garage fire is an unreasonable burden that violates the expected use of a luxury vehicle. Failure to Remedy within a Reasonable Time (49 U.S.C. § 30120) Under the National Traffic and Motor Vehicle Safety Act, specifically 49 U.S.C. § 30120(c)(2), a manufacturer’s failure to remedy a defect within 60 days of a vehicle being presented or a notice being issued constitutes prima facie evidence of a failure to remedy within a reasonable time. The notice for Recall 26V073 was issued in March 2026. As of today, May 11, 2026, more than 60 days have passed without an actionable remedy or a definitive timeline for repair. There have been ZERO warnings or indications of the above mentioned.

NHTSA complaint #11736984 — an unverified report by a vehicle owner.

Falls Church, VA

ELECTRICAL SYSTEM

The contact owns a 2023 Mercedes-Benz EQB 300. The contact received a recall notification NHTSA Campaign Number: 26V073000 (Electrical System) however the parts were unavailable. The dealer was contacted, the contact was informed that the parts were unavailable. The manufacturer was contacted, and a case was filed. The contact was informed that the parts were not available. In addition, the contact was informed that the parts would not become available until 2027. The contact had not experienced any failure regarding the unrepaired recall repair.

NHTSA complaint #11735639 — an unverified report by a vehicle owner.

Marvin, NC

ELECTRICAL SYSTEM

Dear NHTSA Safety Team, I am submitting a formal safety-related complaint regarding my 2023 Mercedes-Benz EQB 250, which is currently under an active high-voltage battery recall. The recall imposes significant safety restrictions, including an 80% charging limit, a requirement to park the vehicle outside due to fire risk, and the inability to safely charge the vehicle at home. Additionally, I have been advised by my dealership that DC fast charging should not be used, further limiting the vehicle’s usability. Mercedes-Benz has informed me that the remedy requires a full high-voltage battery replacement, which may take many months (until at least December). In the meantime, the vehicle is not usable as a daily vehicle due to the combined safety and charging restrictions. I have attempted to work with Mercedes-Benz USA to obtain an appropriate remedy for this loss of use, but I have been told that only minimal options are available, and my request for executive-level review has been denied. I am requesting NHTSA’s assistance in reviewing this matter as a safety-related loss-of-use issue. The current restrictions materially affect my ability to safely operate and maintain the vehicle. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Sincerely, [XXX] INFORMATION REDACTED PURSUANT TO THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 552(B)(6)

NHTSA complaint #11734681 — an unverified report by a vehicle owner.

Marvin, NC

ENGINE

Dear NHTSA Safety Team, I am submitting a formal safety-related complaint regarding my 2023 Mercedes-Benz EQB 250, which is currently under an active high-voltage battery recall. The recall imposes significant safety restrictions, including an 80% charging limit, a requirement to park the vehicle outside due to fire risk, and the inability to safely charge the vehicle at home. Additionally, I have been advised by my dealership that DC fast charging should not be used, further limiting the vehicle’s usability. Mercedes-Benz has informed me that the remedy requires a full high-voltage battery replacement, which may take many months (until at least December). In the meantime, the vehicle is not usable as a daily vehicle due to the combined safety and charging restrictions. I have attempted to work with Mercedes-Benz USA to obtain an appropriate remedy for this loss of use, but I have been told that only minimal options are available, and my request for executive-level review has been denied. I am requesting NHTSA’s assistance in reviewing this matter as a safety-related loss-of-use issue. The current restrictions materially affect my ability to safely operate and maintain the vehicle. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Sincerely, [XXX] INFORMATION REDACTED PURSUANT TO THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 552(B)(6)

NHTSA complaint #11734681 — an unverified report by a vehicle owner.

Midlothian, VA

UNKNOWN OR OTHER

COMPONENT/SYSTEM: High-voltage battery system (traction battery). The vehicle is subject to a manufacturer recall for risk of internal short circuit and potential thermal event. The vehicle and battery are available for inspection upon request. SAFETY RISK: According to the manufacturer and dealer, the defect presents a risk of battery fire, including while the vehicle is parked and not in operation. As a result, the manufacturer has instructed safety precautions, including limiting charging to no more than 80% and parking the vehicle outdoors and away from structures. These precautions materially limit driving range and require the vehicle to be parked away from the residence, which increases risk exposure to occupants, visitors, and surrounding property. REPRODUCTION/CONFIRMATION: The defect has been confirmed by the manufacturer through a formal recall applicable to this vehicle. The dealer has acknowledged the recall and the associated safety instructions. INSPECTIONS: There has been no individualized inspection specific to this vehicle because the issue is a known, manufacturer-identified defect affecting recalled vehicles of this model. The condition and risk have been acknowledged by both the manufacturer and dealer. WARNINGS/SYMPTOMS: There were no prior warning lights, messages, or observable symptoms before receiving notice of the recall. The safety issue was not detectable to the driver absent the manufacturer’s notification. REPAIR STATUS/TIMING: The manufacturer has advised that replacement batteries are not expected to be available for several months (estimated beginning December 2026 or later). In the interim, the vehicle must continue to be operated under the above safety restrictions, while customer must still bear the known, significant risk of fire until then.

NHTSA complaint #11732704 — an unverified report by a vehicle owner.

Philadelphia, PA

ELECTRICAL SYSTEM

The battery has a fire hazard

NHTSA complaint #11732728 — an unverified report by a vehicle owner.

Midlothian, VA

ENGINE

COMPONENT/SYSTEM: High-voltage battery system (traction battery). The vehicle is subject to a manufacturer recall for risk of internal short circuit and potential thermal event. The vehicle and battery are available for inspection upon request. SAFETY RISK: According to the manufacturer and dealer, the defect presents a risk of battery fire, including while the vehicle is parked and not in operation. As a result, the manufacturer has instructed safety precautions, including limiting charging to no more than 80% and parking the vehicle outdoors and away from structures. These precautions materially limit driving range and require the vehicle to be parked away from the residence, which increases risk exposure to occupants, visitors, and surrounding property. REPRODUCTION/CONFIRMATION: The defect has been confirmed by the manufacturer through a formal recall applicable to this vehicle. The dealer has acknowledged the recall and the associated safety instructions. INSPECTIONS: There has been no individualized inspection specific to this vehicle because the issue is a known, manufacturer-identified defect affecting recalled vehicles of this model. The condition and risk have been acknowledged by both the manufacturer and dealer. WARNINGS/SYMPTOMS: There were no prior warning lights, messages, or observable symptoms before receiving notice of the recall. The safety issue was not detectable to the driver absent the manufacturer’s notification. REPAIR STATUS/TIMING: The manufacturer has advised that replacement batteries are not expected to be available for several months (estimated beginning December 2026 or later). In the interim, the vehicle must continue to be operated under the above safety restrictions, while customer must still bear the known, significant risk of fire until then.

NHTSA complaint #11732704 — an unverified report by a vehicle owner.

Locust Grove, GA

ELECTRICAL SYSTEM

Pertaining to the recall of the 2023 Mercedes Benz EQB300. There is no resolution or remedy for this recall. Currently this is my only means of transportation and I do not feel safe at all driving it. I contacted Mercedes Benz for a buyback or loaner. No one senna to be concerned. The fire risk puts me and my children life in danger. I rent my house and have renter’s insurance but a vehicle fire will not be covered if damage occurs

NHTSA complaint #11731113 — an unverified report by a vehicle owner.

Farmington, CT

POWER TRAIN

I am writing to formally notify the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) that Mercedes-Benz USA has failed to remedy a known safety defect within a reasonable amount of time, pursuant to 49 U.S.C. § 30120. This notification is submitted in relation to the recall issued under the National Traffic and Motor Vehicle Safety Act regarding the high-voltage battery cells in the 2023 EQB. The manufacturer has acknowledged that an internal short circuit within the battery cells may lead to a vehicle fire while driving or parked. Despite this, a timely and effective remedy has not been provided, leaving me to manage the following severe burdens: • Safety and Psychological Distress: Every time I operate this vehicle, I experience significant anxiety. My primary concern is the safety of my grandchildren; I am constantly haunted by the question of whether I could safely extricate them from the vehicle should it ignite while in motion. • Property and Liability Concerns: I am currently forced to park the vehicle away from other cars and structures to mitigate the risk of a conflagration. I am deeply concerned about my legal and financial obligations should the vehicle ignite and cause damage to third-party property or result in personal injury. • Diminished Performance: The vehicle currently exhibits a decreased mileage range, failing to meet the performance specifications promised at the time of lease. • Breach of Lease Terms: I am required to make full monthly lease payments as per my agreement. However, Mercedes-Benz is failing to uphold their portion of the contract by providing a vehicle that is safe, functional, and fit for its intended purpose. I request that the NHTSA investigate Mercedes-Benz’s delay in providing a definitive remedy and hold the manufacturer accountable for the loss of use and the inherent dangers posed by this defect. A car that "potentially could ignite into flames" at any moment is not a "remedied" vehicle under the law.

NHTSA complaint #11730623 — an unverified report by a vehicle owner.