Owners have filed 11 complaints
about the 2023 Mercedes Benz EQE 350+ with NHTSA between 2024 and 2026.
The largest single group is the driver assist & collision avoidance.
Complaints filed with NHTSA, by model year. Bar colour is the FaultScore grade:
A
B
C
D
F
ungraded
What breaks on a 2023 Mercedes Benz EQE 350+
Every complaint is filed against a part. Follow any row for the complaints about that part alone.
Driver Assist & Collision Avoidance
545.5%
2 crashes, 0 fires
Brakes
218.2%
Windows, Mirrors & Wipers
19.1%
Acceleration & Cruise Control
19.1%
Body & Structure
19.1%
Airbags
19.1%
1 crashes, 0 fires
When owners complained
A spike years after the car went on sale usually means a part wearing
out on schedule across the whole fleet — the kind of pattern no single
owner can see from inside their own car.
Oct 2024peak 3Jul 2026
Complaints that involved harm
Reports where the owner recorded a crash, a fire, an injury or a death.
Santa Clara, CACrash1 injured
AIR BAGS
Description of Incident: On January 19, 2026, this vehicle was involved in a severe frontal collision. Despite significant structural damage resulting in a total loss (GEICO Claim: 0445628610101151), multiple critical safety systems failed to activate. Specific System Failures: SRS (Airbags): None of the 10 airbags deployed despite a high-energy impact that met deployment thresholds. Active Brake Assist: The system failed to monitor traffic or apply autonomous braking to reduce impact severity. Steering/Stability Assist: No steering intervention or collision warnings were provided during the pre-crash phase. GUARD 360: Collision detection monitoring failed to log the event. Safety Risk: The failure of the airbags to deploy during a high-energy impact represents a catastrophic failure of safety systems mandated by FMVSS 208 and directly increased the risk of occupant injury. Warning Symptoms: The dashboard was clear of all safety faults. No SRS or restraint system warning lights were present prior to the incident. Inspection Status: As of January 22, 2026, the vehicle is being held at Mercedes-Benz of Stevens Creek (San Jose, CA). It is awaiting a formal technical inspection from Mercedes-Benz Corporate. The vehicle is available for NHTSA inspection.
NHTSA complaint #11713424 — an unverified report by a vehicle owner.
Santa Clara, CACrash1 injured
FORWARD COLLISION AVOIDANCE: WARNINGS
Description of Incident: On January 19, 2026, this vehicle was involved in a severe frontal collision. Despite significant structural damage resulting in a total loss (GEICO Claim: 0445628610101151), multiple critical safety systems failed to activate. Specific System Failures: SRS (Airbags): None of the 10 airbags deployed despite a high-energy impact that met deployment thresholds. Active Brake Assist: The system failed to monitor traffic or apply autonomous braking to reduce impact severity. Steering/Stability Assist: No steering intervention or collision warnings were provided during the pre-crash phase. GUARD 360: Collision detection monitoring failed to log the event. Safety Risk: The failure of the airbags to deploy during a high-energy impact represents a catastrophic failure of safety systems mandated by FMVSS 208 and directly increased the risk of occupant injury. Warning Symptoms: The dashboard was clear of all safety faults. No SRS or restraint system warning lights were present prior to the incident. Inspection Status: As of January 22, 2026, the vehicle is being held at Mercedes-Benz of Stevens Creek (San Jose, CA). It is awaiting a formal technical inspection from Mercedes-Benz Corporate. The vehicle is available for NHTSA inspection.
NHTSA complaint #11713424 — an unverified report by a vehicle owner.
Description of Incident: On January 19, 2026, this vehicle was involved in a severe frontal collision. Despite significant structural damage resulting in a total loss (GEICO Claim: 0445628610101151), multiple critical safety systems failed to activate. Specific System Failures: SRS (Airbags): None of the 10 airbags deployed despite a high-energy impact that met deployment thresholds. Active Brake Assist: The system failed to monitor traffic or apply autonomous braking to reduce impact severity. Steering/Stability Assist: No steering intervention or collision warnings were provided during the pre-crash phase. GUARD 360: Collision detection monitoring failed to log the event. Safety Risk: The failure of the airbags to deploy during a high-energy impact represents a catastrophic failure of safety systems mandated by FMVSS 208 and directly increased the risk of occupant injury. Warning Symptoms: The dashboard was clear of all safety faults. No SRS or restraint system warning lights were present prior to the incident. Inspection Status: As of January 22, 2026, the vehicle is being held at Mercedes-Benz of Stevens Creek (San Jose, CA). It is awaiting a formal technical inspection from Mercedes-Benz Corporate. The vehicle is available for NHTSA inspection.
NHTSA complaint #11713424 — an unverified report by a vehicle owner.
The most recent complaints
In the owners' own words, exactly as filed with NHTSA.
Denham Springs, LA
STRUCTURE:BODY
As i was driving on the interstate, i heard a gunshot-like explosion and the sunroof glass broke. Glass shards fell into the car. I had to slow down to 30 mph and exit the interstate. There was no obvious road debris or cars around me at the time of the incident. I drove the car to the dealership where it is for repair
NHTSA complaint #11749068 — an unverified report by a vehicle owner.
Houston, TX
LANE DEPARTURE: BLIND SPOT DETECTION
LEMON LAW NOTICE: [XXX]– [2023 CPO Mercedes EQE350+] – Repeated Defects- Vehicle Safety feautures non functional I request that the TxDMV Enforcement Division investigate the deceptive trade and inspection practices of Mercedes-Benz of North Houston, and compel the dealership to cover the full physical repair and component costs required to bring this vehicle back into manufacturer safety compliance at my local servicing facility. I hold formal video diagnostic evidence provided by a certified technician confirming these facts and will provide it immediately upon request by an investigator. To: AutoNation Corporate Customer Care / Executive Escalations From: [XXX] Date: June 20, 2026 Subject: Escalation: Misrepresentation and Mandatory CPO Inspection Failure – Mercedes-Benz of North Houston Vehicle & Purchase Details: Vehicle: 2023 Mercedes-Benz EQE 350+ VIN: [XXX] Purchase Date: [XXX] Selling Dealership: Mercedes-Benz of North Houston (An AutoNation Dealership) Servicing Dealership: Mercedes-Benz of West Houston Statement of Issue I am writing to formally escalate a serious matter regarding a breach of the Mercedes-Benz Certified Pre-Owned (CPO) standards and a misrepresentation of vehicle condition by Mercedes-Benz of North Houston. I am seeking corporate intervention to resolve a high-cost repair stemming entirely from an undisclosed, out-of-specification pre-existing condition present at the time of sale. Chronology of Events [XXX] (Purchase & Test Drive): I purchased the vehicle as a Certified Pre-Owned unit from Mercedes-Benz of North Houston. During the initial test drive, I explicitly noted and pointed out an active issue with the radar/sensor system to the sales team. Delayed Delivery: Due to this sensor issue, the dealership delayed delivery of the vehicle for approximately 2 to 3 weeks to allegedly resolve the problem. I took delivery in December 2025 once the sensors appeared to be functi INFORMATION REDACTED PURSUANT TO THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 552(B)(6)
NHTSA complaint #11745521 — an unverified report by a vehicle owner.
LEMON LAW NOTICE: [XXX]– [2023 CPO Mercedes EQE350+] – Repeated Defects- Vehicle Safety feautures non functional I request that the TxDMV Enforcement Division investigate the deceptive trade and inspection practices of Mercedes-Benz of North Houston, and compel the dealership to cover the full physical repair and component costs required to bring this vehicle back into manufacturer safety compliance at my local servicing facility. I hold formal video diagnostic evidence provided by a certified technician confirming these facts and will provide it immediately upon request by an investigator. To: AutoNation Corporate Customer Care / Executive Escalations From: [XXX] Date: June 20, 2026 Subject: Escalation: Misrepresentation and Mandatory CPO Inspection Failure – Mercedes-Benz of North Houston Vehicle & Purchase Details: Vehicle: 2023 Mercedes-Benz EQE 350+ VIN: [XXX] Purchase Date: [XXX] Selling Dealership: Mercedes-Benz of North Houston (An AutoNation Dealership) Servicing Dealership: Mercedes-Benz of West Houston Statement of Issue I am writing to formally escalate a serious matter regarding a breach of the Mercedes-Benz Certified Pre-Owned (CPO) standards and a misrepresentation of vehicle condition by Mercedes-Benz of North Houston. I am seeking corporate intervention to resolve a high-cost repair stemming entirely from an undisclosed, out-of-specification pre-existing condition present at the time of sale. Chronology of Events [XXX] (Purchase & Test Drive): I purchased the vehicle as a Certified Pre-Owned unit from Mercedes-Benz of North Houston. During the initial test drive, I explicitly noted and pointed out an active issue with the radar/sensor system to the sales team. Delayed Delivery: Due to this sensor issue, the dealership delayed delivery of the vehicle for approximately 2 to 3 weeks to allegedly resolve the problem. I took delivery in December 2025 once the sensors appeared to be functi INFORMATION REDACTED PURSUANT TO THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 552(B)(6)
NHTSA complaint #11745521 — an unverified report by a vehicle owner.
Houston, TX
LANE DEPARTURE: WARNING
LEMON LAW NOTICE: [XXX]– [2023 CPO Mercedes EQE350+] – Repeated Defects- Vehicle Safety feautures non functional I request that the TxDMV Enforcement Division investigate the deceptive trade and inspection practices of Mercedes-Benz of North Houston, and compel the dealership to cover the full physical repair and component costs required to bring this vehicle back into manufacturer safety compliance at my local servicing facility. I hold formal video diagnostic evidence provided by a certified technician confirming these facts and will provide it immediately upon request by an investigator. To: AutoNation Corporate Customer Care / Executive Escalations From: [XXX] Date: June 20, 2026 Subject: Escalation: Misrepresentation and Mandatory CPO Inspection Failure – Mercedes-Benz of North Houston Vehicle & Purchase Details: Vehicle: 2023 Mercedes-Benz EQE 350+ VIN: [XXX] Purchase Date: [XXX] Selling Dealership: Mercedes-Benz of North Houston (An AutoNation Dealership) Servicing Dealership: Mercedes-Benz of West Houston Statement of Issue I am writing to formally escalate a serious matter regarding a breach of the Mercedes-Benz Certified Pre-Owned (CPO) standards and a misrepresentation of vehicle condition by Mercedes-Benz of North Houston. I am seeking corporate intervention to resolve a high-cost repair stemming entirely from an undisclosed, out-of-specification pre-existing condition present at the time of sale. Chronology of Events [XXX] (Purchase & Test Drive): I purchased the vehicle as a Certified Pre-Owned unit from Mercedes-Benz of North Houston. During the initial test drive, I explicitly noted and pointed out an active issue with the radar/sensor system to the sales team. Delayed Delivery: Due to this sensor issue, the dealership delayed delivery of the vehicle for approximately 2 to 3 weeks to allegedly resolve the problem. I took delivery in December 2025 once the sensors appeared to be functi INFORMATION REDACTED PURSUANT TO THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 552(B)(6)
NHTSA complaint #11745521 — an unverified report by a vehicle owner.
The vehicle has had repeated failures related to the air conditioning system and abnormal battery drain when the heating system is used. The vehicle has been taken to the dealership four times for the same issue and has spent more than two months in total at the dealership for repairs. The technicians have indicated that they have not been able to properly repair the problem. The vehicle continues to have unresolved defects affecting its normal operation and reliability. The vehicle has been at the dealer again from 3/26/2026 to present.
NHTSA complaint #11729782 — an unverified report by a vehicle owner.
Santa Clara, CACrash1 injured
AIR BAGS
Description of Incident: On January 19, 2026, this vehicle was involved in a severe frontal collision. Despite significant structural damage resulting in a total loss (GEICO Claim: 0445628610101151), multiple critical safety systems failed to activate. Specific System Failures: SRS (Airbags): None of the 10 airbags deployed despite a high-energy impact that met deployment thresholds. Active Brake Assist: The system failed to monitor traffic or apply autonomous braking to reduce impact severity. Steering/Stability Assist: No steering intervention or collision warnings were provided during the pre-crash phase. GUARD 360: Collision detection monitoring failed to log the event. Safety Risk: The failure of the airbags to deploy during a high-energy impact represents a catastrophic failure of safety systems mandated by FMVSS 208 and directly increased the risk of occupant injury. Warning Symptoms: The dashboard was clear of all safety faults. No SRS or restraint system warning lights were present prior to the incident. Inspection Status: As of January 22, 2026, the vehicle is being held at Mercedes-Benz of Stevens Creek (San Jose, CA). It is awaiting a formal technical inspection from Mercedes-Benz Corporate. The vehicle is available for NHTSA inspection.
NHTSA complaint #11713424 — an unverified report by a vehicle owner.
Santa Clara, CACrash1 injured
FORWARD COLLISION AVOIDANCE: WARNINGS
Description of Incident: On January 19, 2026, this vehicle was involved in a severe frontal collision. Despite significant structural damage resulting in a total loss (GEICO Claim: 0445628610101151), multiple critical safety systems failed to activate. Specific System Failures: SRS (Airbags): None of the 10 airbags deployed despite a high-energy impact that met deployment thresholds. Active Brake Assist: The system failed to monitor traffic or apply autonomous braking to reduce impact severity. Steering/Stability Assist: No steering intervention or collision warnings were provided during the pre-crash phase. GUARD 360: Collision detection monitoring failed to log the event. Safety Risk: The failure of the airbags to deploy during a high-energy impact represents a catastrophic failure of safety systems mandated by FMVSS 208 and directly increased the risk of occupant injury. Warning Symptoms: The dashboard was clear of all safety faults. No SRS or restraint system warning lights were present prior to the incident. Inspection Status: As of January 22, 2026, the vehicle is being held at Mercedes-Benz of Stevens Creek (San Jose, CA). It is awaiting a formal technical inspection from Mercedes-Benz Corporate. The vehicle is available for NHTSA inspection.
NHTSA complaint #11713424 — an unverified report by a vehicle owner.
Description of Incident: On January 19, 2026, this vehicle was involved in a severe frontal collision. Despite significant structural damage resulting in a total loss (GEICO Claim: 0445628610101151), multiple critical safety systems failed to activate. Specific System Failures: SRS (Airbags): None of the 10 airbags deployed despite a high-energy impact that met deployment thresholds. Active Brake Assist: The system failed to monitor traffic or apply autonomous braking to reduce impact severity. Steering/Stability Assist: No steering intervention or collision warnings were provided during the pre-crash phase. GUARD 360: Collision detection monitoring failed to log the event. Safety Risk: The failure of the airbags to deploy during a high-energy impact represents a catastrophic failure of safety systems mandated by FMVSS 208 and directly increased the risk of occupant injury. Warning Symptoms: The dashboard was clear of all safety faults. No SRS or restraint system warning lights were present prior to the incident. Inspection Status: As of January 22, 2026, the vehicle is being held at Mercedes-Benz of Stevens Creek (San Jose, CA). It is awaiting a formal technical inspection from Mercedes-Benz Corporate. The vehicle is available for NHTSA inspection.
NHTSA complaint #11713424 — an unverified report by a vehicle owner.
West Hills, CA
SERVICE BRAKES
My Mercedes-Benz EQE has an intermittent but dangerous brake failure. When braking lightly and then needing to brake harder, the brake pedal becomes soft and fades, sinking further with almost no increase in braking power. The vehicle continues moving forward even when pressing the pedal harder. I must quickly release the pedal and press it again to regain braking. This creates a serious risk of crashing, especially at low speeds or in traffic. The issue is happening more frequently. Mercedes-Benz of Encino told me “everything is good,” but the issue continues. Another dealership (Mercedes Keys European) refused to even inspect the vehicle. A loaner EQE I drove for several days did NOT have this issue, confirming my vehicle’s braking system is not normal. This is a major safety defect, and I am requesting NHTSA to investigate.
NHTSA complaint #11701695 — an unverified report by a vehicle owner.
Rancho Mirage, CA
VEHICLE SPEED CONTROL
September 8th, 2024 @ approximately 3pm My Mercedes EQE 350+ accelerated to a high speed when the front tire touched a curb. The car ran over the curb and into the parking lot. I was able to steer the car but the brakes didn't work. The car kept going through a stop sign and into the intersection. Luckily there were no cars in the intersection and I finally thought to turn the car off. It then stopped. The whole rubber covering over the battery was destroyed from the rocks on the curb. The battery was severely damaged also. The car was at the dealership from Friday Sept 13th until around Oct 9th. They finished their testing and sent the info to corporate Mercedes on Wed Sept. 18th. I finally heard back from Mercedes corporate on Oct 3rd, 2024. They said that they didn't find any malfunctions. During this waiting period I was pressured by the Mercedes dealership to file an Insurance Claim. I said I wasn't filing a claim until I heard back from Mercedes Corporate. There have been several cases online where the same issue has occurred by other Mercedes owners. One was almost exactly the same as mine. The only difference was that the car stopped when the tires were flattened. I have been driving for 50 years and have never experienced anything like this. My nephew was in the car with me and I repeatedly said to him the brakes aren't working. The car was a write off. I had to file an insurance claim.
NHTSA complaint #11619675 — an unverified report by a vehicle owner.
Rancho Mirage, CA
SERVICE BRAKES
September 8th, 2024 @ approximately 3pm My Mercedes EQE 350+ accelerated to a high speed when the front tire touched a curb. The car ran over the curb and into the parking lot. I was able to steer the car but the brakes didn't work. The car kept going through a stop sign and into the intersection. Luckily there were no cars in the intersection and I finally thought to turn the car off. It then stopped. The whole rubber covering over the battery was destroyed from the rocks on the curb. The battery was severely damaged also. The car was at the dealership from Friday Sept 13th until around Oct 9th. They finished their testing and sent the info to corporate Mercedes on Wed Sept. 18th. I finally heard back from Mercedes corporate on Oct 3rd, 2024. They said that they didn't find any malfunctions. During this waiting period I was pressured by the Mercedes dealership to file an Insurance Claim. I said I wasn't filing a claim until I heard back from Mercedes Corporate. There have been several cases online where the same issue has occurred by other Mercedes owners. One was almost exactly the same as mine. The only difference was that the car stopped when the tires were flattened. I have been driving for 50 years and have never experienced anything like this. My nephew was in the car with me and I repeatedly said to him the brakes aren't working. The car was a write off. I had to file an insurance claim.
NHTSA complaint #11619675 — an unverified report by a vehicle owner.