FaultScore

2010 Mazda CX-9 suspension problems

14 of the 194 complaints about the 2010 Mazda CX-9 are about the suspension — 7% of everything reported for this model year. Half of the failures with a mileage on record happened before 125,000 miles.

A

14

Complaints

0

Crashes

0

Fires

0

Injuries

Exactly what failed

Suspension 14 100.0%

Suspension across every Mazda CX-9 year

2007 29 29.3%
2008 56 56.6%
2010 14 14.1%

What owners said

Filed with NHTSA, in their own words.

Edwards, MO

SUSPENSION

Front suspension broke while my husband was driving back from a fire as he is a volunteer firefighter. He states car did not have any lights on dash to report there was a problem. The next thing he knew he heard a loud squealing noise and lost control of the vehicle taking him off road in a small ditch. As the axle broke it went upward and hit both belts and shredded them. He was not able to move or drive the car at all. I am the owner of this vehicle had I been driving I would have totaled and crashed,also I do have A [XXX] son I drive to school most days. Thank goodness my husband is a heck of a driver. I have contacted the Mazda manufacturer and they are stating that the vehicle was already fixed that they will not do a safety remedy. As I found out there was a 8515G recall for the front suspension interior corroding. I just purchased this vehicle on 2/24/2026 it broke on 3/19/2026. The vehicle states to have been fixed in 2017. I have the inspection papers from the previous dealer from whom I bought it from in 2021 and the one from the dealer that I purchased it and that inspection was in 2025. There has been no inspections after I purchased or after the catastrophic failure happened I am in process of this and my insurance is the next I'm contacting. There was no police report as there was only damage done to the vehicle,luckily no one else was involved and my husband was ok. We have never dealt with this before and didn't really know what to do or how to go about this. INFORMATION REDACTED PURSUANT TO THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 552(B)(6)

NHTSA complaint #11726414 — an unverified report by a vehicle owner.

Rochester, NY

SUSPENSION

Driver side Lower control arm fail off from the ball joint

NHTSA complaint #11622620 — an unverified report by a vehicle owner.

at 160,000 miles Rossville, GA

SUSPENSION

The contact owns a 2010 Mazda CX-9. The contact received notification of NHTSA campaign number 15V451000 (Suspension) however, the part to do the recall repair was unavailable. The local dealer was contacted, and it was confirmed that the part was not available. The contact stated that the manufacturer had exceeded a reasonable amount of time for the recall repair. The manufacturer was made aware of the issue. The contact indicated that while driving at various speeds, a rattling noise was present coming from the front of the vehicle. Additionally, the front end of the vehicle was unstable. The vehicle was taken to the local dealer who indicated that the failure was due to the recall however, the part was on backorder. The failure mileage was 160,000. Parts distribution disconnect.

NHTSA complaint #11437299 — an unverified report by a vehicle owner.

at 125,000 miles Rock Hill, SC

SUSPENSION

THERE ARE NOISES COMING FROM THE FRONT TIRES, WHEN DRIVING. NO ONE COULD PINPOINT THE PROBLEM. BRAKE BOOSTER WENT OUT A COUPLE MONTHS LATER.

NHTSA complaint #11290243 — an unverified report by a vehicle owner.

Albertson, NY

SUSPENSION

VEHICLE PULSATES WHILE BRAKING WHILE DRIVING FAST OR AT SLOWER SPEEDS. THE STEERING WHEEL DOES NOT SHAKE. THE BRAKE PEDAL DOES NOT PULSATE. THE VEHICLE BRAKES WERE CHANGED SEVERAL TIMES WITH NEW ROTORS AND PADS ON ALL FOUR TIRES. I NOTICED THERE WAS A RECALL ON LOWER CONTROL ARMS #15V-451. IT ONLY WAS INSPECTED AT THE TIME OF RECALL BUT NEVER CHANGED. COULD IT BE POSSIBLE THAT THEY ARE NOW WORN AND CAN BE CHANGED PER THE RECALL.

NHTSA complaint #11277789 — an unverified report by a vehicle owner.

at 139,200 miles Berkeley Heights, NJ

SUSPENSION

CONTROL ARM/BALL JOINTS- HAD TO HAVE REPLACED AGAIN ON 9/21/18 AFTER BOTH BEING REPLACED ON 1/12/2016 AS PART OF A RECALL. FEELS LIKE THE CAR IS TRYING TO STEER ITSELF AND NOT VERY SAFE TO DRIVE. AND THEN HAVE TO PAY FOR ANOTHER ALIGNMENT WHICH I JUST HAD DONE AS WELL. THERE SHOULD BE SOME TYPE OF WARRANTY ON A RECALL REPAIR.

NHTSA complaint #11130651 — an unverified report by a vehicle owner.

at 99,000 miles Watchung, NJ

SUSPENSION

WE TOOK OUR 2010 CX-9 WITH 99,000 MILES THE MAZDA DEALER IN UNION NJ BECAUSE OF A NOISE IN THE CAR AND WERE TOLD THAT THE REAR SUBFRAME HAS ROTTED OUT AND IS DESTROYING THE REAR DIFF MOUNTING BOLTS. WE WERE ALSO TOLD THE EXHAUST SYSTEM IS ALSO ROTTED OUT AND THE VEHICLE IS UNSAFE TO DRIVE. IF WE GO OVER A POT HOLE, THE WHOLE UNDERCARRIAGE OF CAR CAN FALL OUT. THIS CAR WAS NOT KEPT AT THE BEACH AND WELL MAINTAINED.

NHTSA complaint #11129881 — an unverified report by a vehicle owner.

at 30,000 miles Little Rock, AR

SUSPENSION

TOOK MY CAR TO DEALER 2-3 TIMES FOR THE BRAKES, WAY BEFORE MY WARRANTY WAS ANY WHERE NEAR EXPIRING, BECAUSE I KEPT HEARING A GRINDING SOUND. THEY KEPT TELLING ME NOTHING WAS WRONG, THAT MY BRAKES HAD SOME GRAVEL ON THEM AND THEY JUST CLEANED THEM. I DON'T TRAVEL ON DIRT ROADS OR ANYTHING, CITY ROADS/HIGHWAYS. NO OUT OF TOWN TRAVEL AT ALL, ACTUAL ONLY IN TOWN TRAVEL, HOME/WORK. MY 2ND CONCERN IS, WHILE DRIVING SOMETIMES MY SPEED SEEMS TO SHIFT, AS IF THE GEARS ARE SHIFTING. 3RD CONCERN IS, I RECEIVED A RECALL NOTICE, DON'T RECALL WHAT IT WAS ABOUT BUT I TOOK IT TO THE DEALERSHIP AND I WAS TOLD THEY DONE THAT WORK LAST TIME I CAME IN BUT I DON'T BELIEVE IT WAS DONE, SINCE THEY HAVEN'T BEEN HONEST WITH ME BEFORE. THEY DIDN'T EVEN LOOK AT THE LETTER. IF I RECALL CORRECTLY BRAKE COMPLAINTS/ SERVICE STARTED 2011 OR 2012 TO 2014....

NHTSA complaint #11005438 — an unverified report by a vehicle owner.

at 120,000 miles Marshfield, MA

SUSPENSION

TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2010 MAZDA CX-9. WHILE THE VEHICLE WAS UNDERGOING ROUTINE MAINTENANCE, THE MECHANIC NOTICED THAT THE CONTROL ARMS WERE LOOSE PREMATURELY. THE MECHANIC REPLACED THE CONTROL ARMS AND THE VEHICLE WAS INCLUDED IN NHTSA CAMPAIGN NUMBER: 15V451000 (SUSPENSION), BUT THE CONTACT WAS NOT NOTIFIED BY THE DEALER NOR THE MANUFACTURER. THE MANUFACTURER WAS NOTIFIED OF THE FAILURE. THE APPROXIMATE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 120,000.

NHTSA complaint #10983227 — an unverified report by a vehicle owner.

Crofton Falls, NY

SUSPENSION

TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2010 MAZDA CX-9. THE CONTACT RECEIVED NOTIFICATION OF NHTSA CAMPAIGN NUMBER: 15V451000 (SUSPENSION). THE CONTACT WAS UNABLE TO RECEIVE THE REPAIR BY THE DEALER WITHIN A REASONABLE TIME FRAME. THE DEALER INDICATED THAT ADDITIONAL REPAIRS HAD BEEN REQUIRED TO MANEUVER VARIOUS PARTS TO COMPLETE THE REPAIR AND THAT A COST WOULD BE APPLIED IN ADDITION TO THE RECALL. THE MANUFACTURER WAS NOTIFIED OF THE ISSUE. THE CONTACT WAS UNCERTAIN OF WHEN THE VEHICLE MAY BE REPAIRED BY THE DEALER. THE CONTACT HAD NOT EXPERIENCED A FAILURE. PARTS DISTRIBUTION DISCONNECT. ..UPDATED 05/23/17 *BF COSUMER STATES THE MATTER HAS BEEN RESOLVED AT NO ADDITIONAL COST.

NHTSA complaint #10957190 — an unverified report by a vehicle owner.

at 128,000 miles Denham Springs, LA

SUSPENSION

TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2010 MAZDA CX-9. WHILE DRIVING IN REVERSE, A LOUD METAL ON METAL NOISE SOUNDED OUTSIDE OF THE VEHICLE. THE FAILURE OCCURRED TWO DAYS AFTER THE VEHICLE WAS SERVICED PER NHTSA CAMPAIGN NUMBER: 15V451000 (SUSPENSION). AN INDEPENDENT MECHANIC CONFIRMED THAT THE FRONT PASSENGER SIDE LOWER CONTROL ARM WAS DEFECTIVE. THE RECALL MENTIONED THAT THE DEALER WOULD REPLACE BOTH THE DRIVER AND PASSENGER SIDE FRONT LOWER CONTROL ARMS; HOWEVER, THE PASSENGER SIDE LOWER CONTROL ARM WAS NOT REPLACED. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN BACK TO THE DEALER WHERE BOTH LOWER CONTROL ARMS WERE REPLACED AND A FOUR WHEEL ALIGNMENT WAS PERFORMED. THE MANUFACTURER WAS NOT NOTIFIED OF THE FAILURE. THE APPROXIMATE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 128,000.

NHTSA complaint #10887560 — an unverified report by a vehicle owner.

Wichita, KS

SUSPENSION

TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2010 MAZDA CX-9. THE CONTACT RECEIVED NOTIFICATION OF NHTSA CAMPAIGN NUMBER: 15V451000 (SUSPENSION); HOWEVER, THE PART TO DO THE REPAIR WAS UNAVAILABLE. THE CONTACT STATED THAT THE MANUFACTURER EXCEEDED A REASONABLE AMOUNT OF TIME FOR THE RECALL REPAIR. THE MANUFACTURER WAS MADE AWARE OF THE ISSUE. THE CONTACT HAD NOT EXPERIENCED A FAILURE. VIN TOOL CONFIRMS PARTS NOT AVAILABLE.

NHTSA complaint #10860753 — an unverified report by a vehicle owner.

Newtown, CT

SUSPENSION

TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2010 MAZDA CX-9. THE CONTACT RECEIVED NOTIFICATION OF NHTSA CAMPAIGN NUMBER: 15V451000 (SUSPENSION); HOWEVER, THE PART TO DO THE REPAIR WAS UNAVAILABLE. THE CONTACT STATED THAT THE MANUFACTURER EXCEEDED A REASONABLE AMOUNT OF TIME FOR THE RECALL REPAIR. THE CONTACT HAD NOT EXPERIENCED A FAILURE. THE MANUFACTURER WAS NOT MADE AWARE OF THE ISSUE. VIN TOOL CONFIRMS PARTS NOT AVAILABLE.

NHTSA complaint #10825336 — an unverified report by a vehicle owner.

Traverse City, MI

SUSPENSION

TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2010 MAZDA CX-9 THE CONTACT RECEIVED NOTIFICATION OF NHTSA CAMPAIGN NUMBER: 15V451000 (SUSPENSION); HOWEVER, THE PART NEEDED TO REPAIR THE VEHICLE WAS UNAVAILABLE. THE CONTACT STATED THAT THE MANUFACTURER EXCEEDED A REASONABLE AMOUNT OF TIME FOR THE RECALL REPAIR. THE MANUFACTURER WAS NOT NOTIFIED OF THE ISSUE. THE CONTACT HAD NOT EXPERIENCED A FAILURE. VIN TOOL CONFIRMS PARTS NOT AVAILABLE. UPDATED 1/20/16 LN

NHTSA complaint #10789292 — an unverified report by a vehicle owner.

Other 2010 Mazda CX-9 problems

← Full 2010 Mazda CX-9 report