Owners have filed 35 complaints
about the 2009 Mercury Grand Marquis with NHTSA between 2009 and 2024.
The largest single group is the brakes.
Across this model's run it ranks 15 of 19 worst.
The letter says how bad. This says what kind — whether this year drew
an unusual number of complaints, unusually dangerous
ones, or failures that arrived unusually early.
The dashed ring is 50 — the national norm. Further out is worse.
Complaint volume — 8
Against the median year of the Mercury Grand Marquis. 50 means typical for this
model; 100 means roughly double.
Severity — 74
14.3% of these complaints
involved a crash, fire, injury or death, against a national rate of
9.7%.
Early failure — 100
69% of failures with a mileage on record happened under
36,000 miles, against a national rate of
29%.
How 2009 compares with every other Mercury Grand Marquis
Complaints filed with NHTSA, by model year. Bar colour is the FaultScore grade:
A
B
C
D
F
ungraded
What breaks on a 2009 Mercury Grand Marquis
Every complaint is filed against a part. Follow any row for the complaints about that part alone.
Brakes
617.1%
1 crashes, 0 fires · median 20,000 mi
Steering
514.3%
Median failure at 114,000 miles
Acceleration & Cruise Control
411.4%
1 crashes, 0 fires · median 24,000 mi
Electrical System
411.4%
0 crashes, 1 fires · median 41,000 mi
Fuel & Propulsion
38.6%
Median failure at 35,000 miles
Tires
25.7%
Median failure at 266,583 miles
Suspension
25.7%
Median failure at 65,908 miles
Transmission & Drivetrain
25.7%
Median failure at 17,500 miles
Engine & Cooling
25.7%
Median failure at 23,500 miles
Seat Belts
12.9%
Median failure at 9,480 miles
Windows, Mirrors & Wipers
12.9%
Median failure at 17,445 miles
Lights
12.9%
Median failure at 17,445 miles
Body & Structure
12.9%
Airbags
12.9%
1 crashes, 0 fires · median 10,000 mi
When it fails
Odometer readings owners gave when they filed. About half of all
complaints include one.
1,000 – 9,999 miles
13.4%
10,000 – 24,999 miles
1344.8%
25,000 – 49,999 miles
1034.5%
50,000 – 74,999 miles
26.9%
75,000 – 99,999 miles
13.4%
150,000+ miles
26.9%
When owners complained
A spike years after the car went on sale usually means a part wearing
out on schedule across the whole fleet — the kind of pattern no single
owner can see from inside their own car.
Nov 2009peak 3Aug 2024
Recalls on the 2009 Mercury Grand Marquis
A complaint is one owner's allegation. A recall is the point at which
the manufacturer or a regulator agreed the defect is real and dangerous
enough to fix for free — however old the car is.
United States — NHTSA
14V704000
STEERING:RACK AND PINION:PINION SHAFT
Ford Motor Company (Ford) is recalling certain model year 2005-2011 Ford Crown Victoria, 2005-2011 Mercury Grand Marquis vehicles manufactured March 23, 2004, to August 30, 2011, and 2005-2011 Lincoln Town Car vehicles manufactured March 8, 2004, to August 30, 2011, and on which the upper intermediate shaft was serviced during the course of safety recall 13V-385. The prior repairs may not have been correctly performed.
Risk: Improper servicing of the upper intermediate shaft could cause the shaft to separate, which can then result in a loss of steering control, and increasing the risk of a crash.
13V385000
STEERING
Ford is recalling certain model year 2005-2011 Ford Crown Victoria (including Crown Victoria Police Interceptors), Mercury Grand Marquis, and Lincoln Town Car vehicles. The affected vehicles are currently registered or were originally sold in Connecticut, Delaware, the District of Columbia, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Vermont, Virginia, West Virginia, and Wisconsin. Severe corrosion can seize the lower intermediate shaft which may cause the upper intermediate shaft to collapse and the steering column lower bearing to separate.
Risk: If the lower bearing separates, the vehicle may experience a loss of steering, increasing the risk of a crash.
Canada — Transport Canada
Canada runs its own recall programme, and its campaigns do not
always mirror the American ones.
Recall 20145021,757 units in Canada
Steering
Certain vehicles serviced as part of recall 2013-287 (13S08) or special service campaign 13R01 may require re-inspection and repair. The service procedure may have resulted in over-extension of one part of a collapsible joint in the intermediate steering shaft. This could potentially result in the shaft becoming disconnected, resulting a loss of steering, which could increase the risk of a crash causing injury and/or damage to property. Correction: Dealers will inspect the intermediate shaft connection and replace the intermediate shaft if necessary.
Recall 201328716,260 units in Canada
Steering
On certain vehicles originally sold or currently registered in areas of heavy road salt usage during winter months (Ontario, Quebec, New Brunswick, Nova Scotia, Prince Edward Island, and Newfoundland & Labrador), the steering column lower intermediate shaft can become severely corroded. This could cause the swing link joint to become stiff or seized. As a result, the upper intermediate shaft could collapse, allowing the steering column lower bearing to separate, causing a loss of steering capability. A loss of steering control could result in a crash causing property damage and/or personal injury. Correction: Dealers will replace the steering lower intermediate shaft. The upper intermediate shaft and steering column lower bearing will be inspected and, if necessary, repaired or replaced. If the steering column lower bearing has separated, a retainer clip will be installed.
Reports where the owner recorded a crash, a fire, an injury or a death.
Chicopee, MACrash
SERVICE BRAKES
An SUV crashed into an apple store in Hingham Mass. The driver told police his foot became stuck to the gas pedal. More likely his foot became hooked under the brake pedal as he tried to quickly shift his foot from the gas pedal up and to the left onto the brake pedal. This has happened to me several times after accelerating and then having to make a 'panic' stop. I had to quickly wiggle-foot from under to the top of the brake pedal. Brake pedals should be changed from a T shaped to a 7 shaped configuration. This would eliminate the hook. T configuration-the 'stem' is attached under the center of the brake pedal 7 configuration-the 'stem' is attached under the right edge of the brake pedal
NHTSA complaint #11503443 — an unverified report by a vehicle owner.
at 49,984 milesDallas, TXFire1 injured
ELECTRICAL SYSTEM
ON OCTOBER 21, 2016, WHILE I WAS DRIVING ON I-30 IN DALLAS COUNTY, A FIRE OCCURRED IN THE DAIMAY-SUPPLIED DRIVER-SIDE VISOR LAMP ASSEMBLY OF MY 2009 FORD MERCURY GRAND MARQUIS. THE FORD FUSE SYSTEM FAILED, ALLOWING THE FIRE TO BURN, MELTING PORTIONS OF THE VISOR AND ROOF MATERIAL. THE MELTED MATERIAL FELL ON MY LEFT LEG AND THE DRIVER SEAT AND FLOOR OF THE VEHICLE, CAUSING 2ND AND 3RD DEGREE BURNS TO MY LEG. CHRYSLER NOTIFIED NHTSA OF A SIMILAR DEFECT IN THE DAIMAY ASSEMBLY ON JULY 1, 2014, WHICH RESULTED IN THE FIRST OF TWO CHRYSLER RECALLS ON JULY 10, 2014. FORD, HOWEVER, CHOSE TO NOT RECALL ITS VEHICLES WITH THE DAIMAY VISOR ASSEMBLY SYSTEM, DESPITE RECEIVING NOTICE OF SIMILAR COMPLAINTS, CLAIMS AND INCIDENTS BEFORE THE SUBJECT INCIDENT. THEREFORE, I RESPECTFULLY REQUEST THAT THIS DEFECT BE PROMPTLY INVESTIGATED AND THAT THE UNSAFE SYSTEM BE RECALLED SO THAT OTHER CONSUMERS ARE NOT INJURED.
NHTSA complaint #11042676 — an unverified report by a vehicle owner.
at 10,000 milesPink Hill, NCCrash
AIR BAGS
TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2009 MERCURY GRAND MARQUIS. HE STATED THAT HE HIT A DEER IN DECEMBER OF 2009 AND THE AIR BAGS DID NOT DEPLOY. HE DROVE THE VEHICLE TO THE DEALER AND THE DEALER SAID THEY WOULD ORDER A NEW AIR BAG FOR HIM. THE DEALER STATED THAT THE PART IS ON BACK ORDER. THE CONTACT STATED IT HAD BEEN 5 MONTHS SINCE THE DEALER ORDERED THE PART. THE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 10,000. THE CURRENT MILEAGE WAS 15,000.
NHTSA complaint #10317810 — an unverified report by a vehicle owner.
at 10,000 milesHickory Hills, ILCrash
VEHICLE SPEED CONTROL
TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2009 MERCURY GRAND MARQUIS. HE APPLIED PRESSURE TO THE BRAKE PEDAL WHEN ATTEMPTING TO PARK THE VEHICLE, BUT IT LURCHED FORWARD. THE VEHICLE CRASHED THROUGH THE GARAGE WALLS INTO THE ADJACENT ROOM. THERE WAS NO PERSONAL INJURY. THERE WERE DAMAGES TO THE WALLS AND FURNITURE WHICH OCCUPIED THE ADJACENT ROOM. THE FRONT END OF THE VEHICLE SUSTAINED MODERATE DAMAGES. THE VEHICLE WAS TOWED TO AN AUTHORIZED DEALER FOR DIAGNOSTIC TESTING. THE VEHICLE WAS REPAIRED FOR THE BODY DAMAGES. THE TECHNICIAN WAS UNABLE TO DETERMINE THE CAUSE OF FAILURE. THE FAILURE AND CURRENT MILEAGES WERE 10,000. UPDATED 11/23/09 *BF UPDATED 11/24/09
NHTSA complaint #10290778 — an unverified report by a vehicle owner.
The most recent complaints
In the owners' own words, exactly as filed with NHTSA.
Bethel, OH
STEERING
About a month ago I contacted Beechmont Ford (600 Ohio Pike Cincinnati, Ohio 45245) in reference to Manufacturer Recall Number # 13S08 NHTSA Recall Number # 13V385000. I've wrote them three time and they have not responded. A week ago I chatted with Fords Hotline and they said they would do what they could. I've heard nothing back. Where do I go from here?
NHTSA complaint #11609513 — an unverified report by a vehicle owner.
Chicopee, MACrash
SERVICE BRAKES
An SUV crashed into an apple store in Hingham Mass. The driver told police his foot became stuck to the gas pedal. More likely his foot became hooked under the brake pedal as he tried to quickly shift his foot from the gas pedal up and to the left onto the brake pedal. This has happened to me several times after accelerating and then having to make a 'panic' stop. I had to quickly wiggle-foot from under to the top of the brake pedal. Brake pedals should be changed from a T shaped to a 7 shaped configuration. This would eliminate the hook. T configuration-the 'stem' is attached under the center of the brake pedal 7 configuration-the 'stem' is attached under the right edge of the brake pedal
NHTSA complaint #11503443 — an unverified report by a vehicle owner.
Tucson, AZ
STRUCTURE:BODY:DOOR
Driver side door jambed locked. Cannot exit the vehicle without sliding across to passenger door.
NHTSA complaint #11425289 — an unverified report by a vehicle owner.
at 175,000 milesAnniston, AL
STEERING
TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2009 MERCURY GRAND MARQUIS. WHILE DRIVING VARIOUS SPEEDS, THE CONTACT HEARD AN ABNORMAL NOISE COMING FROM THE STEERING WHEEL. THE CONTACT ALSO STATED THAT THE VEHICLE HAD TO BE PLACED IN NEUTRAL TO BE STARTED. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO AN INDEPENDENT MECHANIC WHERE IT WAS DIAGNOSED THAT THE STEERING COLUMN NEEDED TO BE REPLACED. THE VEHICLE WAS NOT REPAIRED AND THE FAILURE RECURRED. SUNNY KING FORD (1507 S QUINTARD AVE, ANNISTON, AL 36201, (256) 831-5300) WAS CONTACTED TO SCHEDULE A SECOND DIAGNOSTIC TEST, BUT THE CONTACT WAS HAVING DIFFICULTY GETTING THE VEHICLE TO THE DEALER. THE CONTACT REFERENCED NHTSA CAMPAIGN NUMBER: 13V385000 (STEERING). THE MANUFACTURER WAS MADE AWARE OF THE FAILURE AND PROVIDED CASE NUMBER: CAS-22278603. THE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS APPROXIMATELY 175,000.
NHTSA complaint #11241038 — an unverified report by a vehicle owner.
at 49,984 milesDallas, TXFire1 injured
ELECTRICAL SYSTEM
ON OCTOBER 21, 2016, WHILE I WAS DRIVING ON I-30 IN DALLAS COUNTY, A FIRE OCCURRED IN THE DAIMAY-SUPPLIED DRIVER-SIDE VISOR LAMP ASSEMBLY OF MY 2009 FORD MERCURY GRAND MARQUIS. THE FORD FUSE SYSTEM FAILED, ALLOWING THE FIRE TO BURN, MELTING PORTIONS OF THE VISOR AND ROOF MATERIAL. THE MELTED MATERIAL FELL ON MY LEFT LEG AND THE DRIVER SEAT AND FLOOR OF THE VEHICLE, CAUSING 2ND AND 3RD DEGREE BURNS TO MY LEG. CHRYSLER NOTIFIED NHTSA OF A SIMILAR DEFECT IN THE DAIMAY ASSEMBLY ON JULY 1, 2014, WHICH RESULTED IN THE FIRST OF TWO CHRYSLER RECALLS ON JULY 10, 2014. FORD, HOWEVER, CHOSE TO NOT RECALL ITS VEHICLES WITH THE DAIMAY VISOR ASSEMBLY SYSTEM, DESPITE RECEIVING NOTICE OF SIMILAR COMPLAINTS, CLAIMS AND INCIDENTS BEFORE THE SUBJECT INCIDENT. THEREFORE, I RESPECTFULLY REQUEST THAT THIS DEFECT BE PROMPTLY INVESTIGATED AND THAT THE UNSAFE SYSTEM BE RECALLED SO THAT OTHER CONSUMERS ARE NOT INJURED.
NHTSA complaint #11042676 — an unverified report by a vehicle owner.
at 65,908 milesPennellville, NY
SUSPENSION
TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2009 MERCURY GRAND MARQUIS. WHILE DRIVING AND EXITING OFF THE RAMP THE VEHICLE DROVE OVER A BUMP AND THE REAR OF THE VEHICLE ELEVATED HIGHLY WITHOUT WARNING. THE VEHICLE WAS DRIVEN TO THE CONTACT'S RESIDENCE. THE VEHICLE WAS NOT DIAGNOSED. THE DEALER REPLACED THE AIR COMPRESSOR; HOWEVER, THE FAILURE RECURRED. THE MANUFACTURER WAS NOT MADE AWARE OF THE FAILURE. THE APPROXIMATE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 65,908. UPDATED 03/02/17*LJ
NHTSA complaint #10947126 — an unverified report by a vehicle owner.
at 80,500 milesGranite City, IL
FUEL/PROPULSION SYSTEM
I NOTICED SOMETHING HANGING DOWN FROM THE BOTTOM OF THE VEHICLE AND ON INSPECTION DETERMINED IT TO BE A FUEL TANK SUPPORT STRAP. I TOOK THE VEHICLE TO MY MECHANIC FOR FURTHER INSPECTION AND WHEN HE PUT THE VEHICLE ON A LIFT ONE OF THE TWO SUPPORT STRAPS HAD CORRODED COMPLETELY IN TWO AND THE OTHER STRAP WAS LY CORRODED NEARLY AS BAD. IF THE SECOND STRAP HAD ALSO BROKEN AND ALLOWED THE FUEL TANK TO DROP AND DRAG ON THE PAVEMENT THERE COULD HAVE BEEN A SEVERE FIRE. I HAD MY MECHANIC REPLACE BOTH STRAPS IMMEDIATELY TODAY 11-2-16.
NHTSA complaint #10923797 — an unverified report by a vehicle owner.
at 37,000 milesFramingham, MA
VEHICLE SPEED CONTROL
TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2009 MERCURY GRAND MARQUIS. WHILE DRIVING 30 MPH, THE VEHICLE FAILED TO RESPOND WHEN THE BRAKE PEDAL WAS DEPRESSED AND THE VEHICLE INDEPENDENTLY ACCELERATED. THE CONTACT WAS ABLE TO STOP THE VEHICLE BY SWITCHING TO THE PARK POSITION. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO A DEALER WHERE IT WAS DIAGNOSED, BUT THE CONTACT WAS UNAWARE OF THE DIAGNOSIS. THE VEHICLE WAS REPAIRED, BUT THE FAILURE RECURRED. THE MANUFACTURER WAS NOTIFIED OF THE FAILURE. THE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 37,000.
NHTSA complaint #10860258 — an unverified report by a vehicle owner.
at 37,000 milesFramingham, MA
SERVICE BRAKES
TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2009 MERCURY GRAND MARQUIS. WHILE DRIVING 30 MPH, THE VEHICLE FAILED TO RESPOND WHEN THE BRAKE PEDAL WAS DEPRESSED AND THE VEHICLE INDEPENDENTLY ACCELERATED. THE CONTACT WAS ABLE TO STOP THE VEHICLE BY SWITCHING TO THE PARK POSITION. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO A DEALER WHERE IT WAS DIAGNOSED, BUT THE CONTACT WAS UNAWARE OF THE DIAGNOSIS. THE VEHICLE WAS REPAIRED, BUT THE FAILURE RECURRED. THE MANUFACTURER WAS NOTIFIED OF THE FAILURE. THE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 37,000.
NHTSA complaint #10860258 — an unverified report by a vehicle owner.
at 35,000 milesDockinson, TX
ELECTRICAL SYSTEM
INTERIOR LIGHTING CABLE BURNED OUT. LOST FLOOR LIGHTS, DOOR LIGHTS AND MAP LIGHTS
NHTSA complaint #10717685 — an unverified report by a vehicle owner.
at 53,000 milesAlbuquerque, NM
STEERING
I AM WRITING TO YOU CONCERNING A LETTER I RECENTLY RECEIVED FROM THE FORD MOTOR COMPANY CONCERNING SAFETY RECALL NUMBER 13S08 / NHTSA RECALL 13V385 STEERING COLUMN SHAFT FOR MY 2009 GRAND MARQUIS, VEHICLE ID#XXXXX.. I RECEIVED THE FIRST NOTICE OF THIS RECALL OCTOBER 2013. I CALLED RICH FORD LOCATED AT 8601 LOMAS BLVD NE, ALBUQUERQUE, NM 87112, PHONE NUMBER (505) 292-0000 ON NOVEMBER 1, 2013 TO MAKE AN APPOINTMENT ON NOVEMBER 5, 2013, TO HAVE THE WORK DONE. ON NOVEMBER 4TH, I RECEIVED A CALL ASKING IF I DROVE THE CAR IN MICHIGAN. TOLD HER I BOUGHT THE CAR USED AND DID NOT KNOW ITS HISTORY. I WAS ADVISED BY RICH FORD THAT THE RECALL DID NOT APPLY TO MY CAR BECAUSE WE DID NOT LIVE IN A HIGH CORROSION AREA. AFTER RECEIVING THIS PHONE CALL, I CONTACTED FORD MOTOR COMPANY BY EMAIL ON NOVEMBER 4TH CONCERNING MY CONVERSATION WITH RICH FORD. I RECEIVED A REPLY TO MY EMAIL FROM TEENA A REPRESENTATIVE OF THE FORD CUSTOMER RELATIONSHIP CENTER (CRC) WHO INSTRUCTED ME TO CONTACT SERVICE ADVISOR ALISON AT RICH FORD TO ARRANGE FOR MY VEHICLE TO BE INSPECTED. I CONTACTED RICH FORD AND TOOK MY VEHICLE IN FOR THE REPAIRS. I WAS TOLD IT WOULD BE 2 TO 3 DAYS TO HAVE THE WORK DONE. ABOUT 4 HOURS LATER I RECEIVED A CALL FROM RICH FORD INFORMING ME THAT THE WORK HAD BEEN PERFORMED. A YEAR LATER, I RECEIVED ANOTHER LETTER FROM FORD MOTOR COMPANY INFORMING ME THAT I NEEDED TO GET THE RECALL WORK PERFORMED. I WENT INTO RICH FORD TO DISCUSS THIS, AND THEY TOLD ME THAT THE WORK HAD BEEN PERFORMED. LAST MONTH I AGAIN RECEIVED A LETTER FROM THE FORD MOTOR COMPANY SAYING THAT I NEEDED TO HAVE THE SAFETY RECALL WORK PERFORMED. I WENT TO THE NATIONAL HIGHWAY TRANSPORTATION SAFETY ADMINISTRATION AND PERFORMED A SEARCH ON MY VEHICLES VIN AND THE RESULT WAS A RECALL STILL BEING OPEN FOR THIS REPAIR. IS FORD MOTOR COMPANY RESPONSIBLE FOR HAVING THIS RECALL COMPETED OR NOT?
NHTSA complaint #10715529 — an unverified report by a vehicle owner.
at 35,000 milesFarmington, MI
FUEL SYSTEM, GASOLINE
TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2009 MERCURY GRAND MARQUIS. THE CONTACT STATED THAT AFTER REFUELING, GASOLINE FUEL FUMES EMITTED INSIDE THE VEHICLE AND THE FUEL WOULD DISSIPATE TO HALF OF A TANK WITHIN TWENTY MINUTES OF DRIVING. THE DEALER DIAGNOSED THAT THE FUEL LINE, THE FUEL PUMP, AND THE FUEL SEAL NEEDED TO BE REPLACED. THE VEHICLE WAS REPAIRED. HOWEVER, THE FAILURE RECURRED. THE MANUFACTURER WAS NOT NOTIFIED OF THE FAILURE. THE APPROXIMATE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 35,000.
NHTSA complaint #10651727 — an unverified report by a vehicle owner.
Winchester, KY
STEERING
ON OCTOBER 31, 2013 I RECEIVED A RECALL NOTICE FOR THIS VEHICLE: REF: NHTSA SAFETY RECALL 13V385. I CONTACTED THE DEALER WHERE WE ORIGINALLY PURCHASED THE VEHICLE; [XXX] @ MADISON COUNTY FORD IN RICHMOND, KY 40475 ON NOVEMBER 6, 2013 AND TOLD HIM I HAD RECEIVED THE NOTICE. HE TOLD ME THAT THE PARTS HAD NOT ARRIVED YET. ON DECEMBER 1, I CALLED AGAIN AND WAS TOLD THE PARTS HAD NOT ARRIVED YET, TO CALL BACK ON DECEMBER 15. ON DECEMBER 15, I CALLED AGAIN AND WAS TOLD THE PARTS HAD NOT ARRIVED YET. TODAY I CALLED NICK @ MADISON COUNTY FORD AGAIN AND HE SAID THE PARTS HAD NOT ARRIVED YET AND HE HAD NO IDEA WHEN THEY WOULD. HE WAS VERY CURT WITH ME. NEXT SUNDAY, JANUARY 12, I HAVE TO MAKE A LONG DISTANCE TRIP IN THIS VEHICLE AND I AM VERY CONCERNED WITH THE SAFETY. I TOLD HIM AND HE SAID WHAT DO YOU WANT ME TO DO ABOUT IT. I AM NOT HAPPY. I NEED YOUR ASSISTANCE ON THIS MATTER. PLEASE. INFORMATION REDACTED PURSUANT TO THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 552(B)(6).
NHTSA complaint #10558875 — an unverified report by a vehicle owner.
Riverview, FL
STEERING
TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2009 MERCURY GRAND MARQUIS. THE CONTACT RECEIVED NHTSA CAMPAIGN ID NUMBER 13V385000 (STEERING) HOWEVER, THE CONTACT WAS UNABLE TO HAVE THE VEHICLE SERVICED UNDER THE RECALL DUE TO THE REQUIRED PART NOT BEING AVAILABLE FOR THE REPAIR. THE MANUFACTURER WAS NOT NOTIFIED OF THE PROBLEM. THE CONTACT DID NOT EXPERIENCE A FAILURE.
NHTSA complaint #10555948 — an unverified report by a vehicle owner.
at 513,667 milesRochelle, IL
TIRES
THE TIRES ON MY 2009, MERCURY MARQUIS, ARE DRY ROTTED. I HAVE ALSO NOTED THAT THERE ARE HOLES IN THE SIDEWALLS ON ALL OF THEM ALONG WITH A LARGE BULGE IN THE RIGHT PASSENGER, SIDE TIRE WALL WITH A TEAR AND LARGE HOLE WHERE THE BULGE IS. I HAVE BEEN TRYING TO LOOK UP ON THE WEB SITE TO SEE IF MY TIRES ARE IN THE RECALL LISTS WITH SOME DIFFICULTY. I SINCERLY HOPE YOU CAN HELP ME WITH THIS PROBLEM AS I AM AFRAID TO DRIVE NOW AND MY HUSBAND HAS SEVERE PARKINSONS DESEASE AND I AM AFRAID SOMETHING IS GOING TO HAPPEN TO HIM. THANK YOU! I WILL BE LOOKING FORWARD TO YOUR RESPONSE.
NHTSA complaint #10542308 — an unverified report by a vehicle owner.
at 47,000 milesMount Juliet, TN
ELECTRICAL SYSTEM
I HAD CHECKED THE TIRE PRESSURES PRIOR TO A ROAD TRIP AND FOUND THEM AT 38 PSI. I RESET THE PRESSURES TO THE SPEC OF 33 PSI. SHORTLY THE TIRE MONITOR CAME ON AND SIGNALED A LOW TIRE PRESSURE. I RECHECKED AND THEY WERE OK. DURING MY TRIP THE LIGHT WOULD KEEP COMING ON AND I TRIED TO RESET THE SYSTEM TO NO AVAIL. ON MY RETURN, THE POWER DOOR LOCKS KEPT MALFUNCTIONING. THE DOOR KEY PAD WOULD WORK SOMETIME FOR BOTH THE DOORS AND TRUNK. THE NEXT TIME THEY MIGHT NOT. THE DOOR SWITCHES ON BOTH PASSENGERS AND DRIVERS SIDE WOULD WORK SOMETIMES. WITH BOTH THE TIRE PRESSURE SYSTEM AND THE DOOR LOCKS ACTING UP AND CREATING A NUISANCE, I TOOK THE CAR TO THE FORD DEALERSHIP, TWO RIVER FORD IN MOUNT JULIET, TN.. THE FOUND A SHORTED WIRE IN THE HARNESS GOING TO THE DRIVERS SIDE MODULE THAT COORDINATES MOST OF THE SAFETY SYSTEMS ON THE CAR. THERE WAS NO FIRE IN MY CASE, HOWEVER, THERE COULD HAVE BEEN. I DID RECEIVE A BILL FOR $272.30. MY CONCERN IS THAT FORD APPARENTLY DOES NOT ACCEPT ANY RESPONSIBILITY FOR WHAT I CONSIDER A SAFETY ISSUE WHETHER IT WAS CAUSED BY POOR SYSTEM DESIGN ON THE HARNESS LAYOUT OR ELECTRICAL CURRENT EXCEEDING THE WIRING CAPABILITIES. WAS IT CAUSED BY EXCESSIVE MOVEMENT IN THE HARNESS OR WAS IT CURRENT GOING THROUGH THE WIRES AS I TRIED TO RESET THE PRESSURE MONITORING SYSTEM 20-30 TIMES. I AM MORE THEN INTERESTED IN KNOWING HOW MANY SIMILAR FAILURES FORD HAS HAD IN THE GRAND MARQUIS AND THE FORD CROWN VIC.
NHTSA complaint #10534237 — an unverified report by a vehicle owner.
at 27,000 milesRidgeland, MS
ENGINE
I WAS DRIVING AT 45 MPH AND APPLIED THE BRAKE TO STOP. THE ENGINE REVVED TO 2,000 RPM. I WAS ABLE TO STOP WITH VERY HARD BRAKING USING BOTH FEET. THE ENGINE CONTINUE REVVING AT 2,000 RPM EVEN AFTER THE CAR HAD STOPPED. I PLACED THE TRANSMISSION IN NEUTRAL AND THE ENGINE REVVED EVEN FASTER. THE ENGINE DID NOT SLOW DOWN UNTIL I TURNED OFF THE IGNITION. AFTER LEAVING THE ENGINE OFF FOR AROUND TWO MINUTES, I RESTARTED THE ENGINE AND IT RESUMED RUNNING AT AROUND 500 RPM. MY 23 YEAR OLD SON WAS SEATED NEXT TO ME AND VERIFIED THAT NOTHING WAS TOUCHING THE ACCELERATOR WHILE THE ENGINE WAS REVVING AT 2,000 RPM AND THAT BOTH OF MY FEET WERE ON THE BRAKE. THE ENGINE HAS REVVED WHEN I APPLIED THE BRAKE AT LEAST SEVEN OTHER TIMES; HOWEVER, THE REVVING STOPPED AFTER ONE OR TWO SECONDS. I HAVE TAKEN THE CAR TO A FORD DEALER THREE TIMES FOR THIS PROBLEM; HOWEVER, THEY HAVE NOT BEEN ABLE TO FIND THE CAUSE OF THE PROBLEM.
NHTSA complaint #10514506 — an unverified report by a vehicle owner.
at 27,000 milesRidgeland, MS
SERVICE BRAKES
I WAS DRIVING AT 45 MPH AND APPLIED THE BRAKE TO STOP. THE ENGINE REVVED TO 2,000 RPM. I WAS ABLE TO STOP WITH VERY HARD BRAKING USING BOTH FEET. THE ENGINE CONTINUE REVVING AT 2,000 RPM EVEN AFTER THE CAR HAD STOPPED. I PLACED THE TRANSMISSION IN NEUTRAL AND THE ENGINE REVVED EVEN FASTER. THE ENGINE DID NOT SLOW DOWN UNTIL I TURNED OFF THE IGNITION. AFTER LEAVING THE ENGINE OFF FOR AROUND TWO MINUTES, I RESTARTED THE ENGINE AND IT RESUMED RUNNING AT AROUND 500 RPM. MY 23 YEAR OLD SON WAS SEATED NEXT TO ME AND VERIFIED THAT NOTHING WAS TOUCHING THE ACCELERATOR WHILE THE ENGINE WAS REVVING AT 2,000 RPM AND THAT BOTH OF MY FEET WERE ON THE BRAKE. THE ENGINE HAS REVVED WHEN I APPLIED THE BRAKE AT LEAST SEVEN OTHER TIMES; HOWEVER, THE REVVING STOPPED AFTER ONE OR TWO SECONDS. I HAVE TAKEN THE CAR TO A FORD DEALER THREE TIMES FOR THIS PROBLEM; HOWEVER, THEY HAVE NOT BEEN ABLE TO FIND THE CAUSE OF THE PROBLEM.
NHTSA complaint #10514506 — an unverified report by a vehicle owner.
at 27,000 milesRidgeland, MS
FUEL/PROPULSION SYSTEM
I WAS DRIVING AT 45 MPH AND APPLIED THE BRAKE TO STOP. THE ENGINE REVVED TO 2,000 RPM. I WAS ABLE TO STOP WITH VERY HARD BRAKING USING BOTH FEET. THE ENGINE CONTINUE REVVING AT 2,000 RPM EVEN AFTER THE CAR HAD STOPPED. I PLACED THE TRANSMISSION IN NEUTRAL AND THE ENGINE REVVED EVEN FASTER. THE ENGINE DID NOT SLOW DOWN UNTIL I TURNED OFF THE IGNITION. AFTER LEAVING THE ENGINE OFF FOR AROUND TWO MINUTES, I RESTARTED THE ENGINE AND IT RESUMED RUNNING AT AROUND 500 RPM. MY 23 YEAR OLD SON WAS SEATED NEXT TO ME AND VERIFIED THAT NOTHING WAS TOUCHING THE ACCELERATOR WHILE THE ENGINE WAS REVVING AT 2,000 RPM AND THAT BOTH OF MY FEET WERE ON THE BRAKE. THE ENGINE HAS REVVED WHEN I APPLIED THE BRAKE AT LEAST SEVEN OTHER TIMES; HOWEVER, THE REVVING STOPPED AFTER ONE OR TWO SECONDS. I HAVE TAKEN THE CAR TO A FORD DEALER THREE TIMES FOR THIS PROBLEM; HOWEVER, THEY HAVE NOT BEEN ABLE TO FIND THE CAUSE OF THE PROBLEM.
NHTSA complaint #10514506 — an unverified report by a vehicle owner.
at 20,000 milesRidgeland, MS
POWER TRAIN
MY WIFE WAS DRIVING AROUND 25 MPH AND LESS THAN ONE MILE FROM OUR HOUSE. WHEN SHE APPLIED THE BRAKES TO STOP AT A STOP SIGN THE ENGINE REVVED UP. I WAS RIDING WITH HER AND OBSERVED THE ENGINE REV TO AROUND 2,500 RPM BEFORE SLOWING DOWN. I ALSO OBSERVED THAT HER RIGHT FOOT WAS ON THE BRAKE AND THAT NOTHING WAS TOUCHING THE ACCELERATOR. THE CRUISE CONTROL HAD NOT BEEN TURNED ON. THIS WAS AT LEAST THE FOURTH TIME THIS YEAR THAT THE ENGINE REVVED UP WHEN THE BRAKES WERE APPLIED. THE DEALER COULD NOT FIND THE PROBLEM AND THE ENGINE DID NOT REV WHILE THE DEALER WAS TESTING THE CAR.
NHTSA complaint #10490380 — an unverified report by a vehicle owner.
at 20,000 milesRidgeland, MS
ENGINE
MY WIFE WAS DRIVING AROUND 25 MPH AND LESS THAN ONE MILE FROM OUR HOUSE. WHEN SHE APPLIED THE BRAKES TO STOP AT A STOP SIGN THE ENGINE REVVED UP. I WAS RIDING WITH HER AND OBSERVED THE ENGINE REV TO AROUND 2,500 RPM BEFORE SLOWING DOWN. I ALSO OBSERVED THAT HER RIGHT FOOT WAS ON THE BRAKE AND THAT NOTHING WAS TOUCHING THE ACCELERATOR. THE CRUISE CONTROL HAD NOT BEEN TURNED ON. THIS WAS AT LEAST THE FOURTH TIME THIS YEAR THAT THE ENGINE REVVED UP WHEN THE BRAKES WERE APPLIED. THE DEALER COULD NOT FIND THE PROBLEM AND THE ENGINE DID NOT REV WHILE THE DEALER WAS TESTING THE CAR.
NHTSA complaint #10490380 — an unverified report by a vehicle owner.
at 20,000 milesRidgeland, MS
SERVICE BRAKES
MY WIFE WAS DRIVING AROUND 25 MPH AND LESS THAN ONE MILE FROM OUR HOUSE. WHEN SHE APPLIED THE BRAKES TO STOP AT A STOP SIGN THE ENGINE REVVED UP. I WAS RIDING WITH HER AND OBSERVED THE ENGINE REV TO AROUND 2,500 RPM BEFORE SLOWING DOWN. I ALSO OBSERVED THAT HER RIGHT FOOT WAS ON THE BRAKE AND THAT NOTHING WAS TOUCHING THE ACCELERATOR. THE CRUISE CONTROL HAD NOT BEEN TURNED ON. THIS WAS AT LEAST THE FOURTH TIME THIS YEAR THAT THE ENGINE REVVED UP WHEN THE BRAKES WERE APPLIED. THE DEALER COULD NOT FIND THE PROBLEM AND THE ENGINE DID NOT REV WHILE THE DEALER WAS TESTING THE CAR.
NHTSA complaint #10490380 — an unverified report by a vehicle owner.
at 33,000 milesRiverton, NJ
VEHICLE SPEED CONTROL
TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2009 MERCURY GRAND MARQUIS. THE CONTACT STATED THAT WHILE THE BRAKES WAS ENGAGED THERE WAS AN SUDDEN INCREASE ON ENGINE RPMS. THE CONTACT MENTIONED THAT THE REAR WHEELS STARTED TO SPIN AND IN ORDER TO STOP IT HE HAD TO SHIFT INTO NEUTRAL. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO THE DEALER WHO WAS UNABLE TO DUPLICATE THE FAILURE. THE FAILURE MILEAGE AND CURRENT MILEAGE WAS 33,000.
NHTSA complaint #10473193 — an unverified report by a vehicle owner.
at 15,000 milesRidgeland, MS
POWER TRAIN
I APPLIED THE BRAKES AT AROUND 20 MILES PER HOUR ON JANUARY 25 AND THE MOTOR ACCELERATED FOR ONE OR TWO SECONDS. I WAS ABLE TO STOP THE CAR BY PRESSING THE BRAKES MUCH HARDER THAN NORMAL. ON JANUARY 26 I APPLIED THE BRAKES AT AROUND 60 MILES PER HOUR AND THE MOTOR AGAIN ACCELERATED FOR ONE OR TWO SECONDS. I CONTINUED TO PRESS THE BRAKES, THE MOTOR SLOWED DOWN AND THE CAR EVENTUALLY SLOWED. IT SOUNDED LIKE PRESSING THE ACCELERATOR DOWN HARD TO PASS ANOTHER CAR ON A TWO LANE ROAD.
NHTSA complaint #10445617 — an unverified report by a vehicle owner.
at 15,000 milesRidgeland, MS
VEHICLE SPEED CONTROL
I APPLIED THE BRAKES AT AROUND 20 MILES PER HOUR ON JANUARY 25 AND THE MOTOR ACCELERATED FOR ONE OR TWO SECONDS. I WAS ABLE TO STOP THE CAR BY PRESSING THE BRAKES MUCH HARDER THAN NORMAL. ON JANUARY 26 I APPLIED THE BRAKES AT AROUND 60 MILES PER HOUR AND THE MOTOR AGAIN ACCELERATED FOR ONE OR TWO SECONDS. I CONTINUED TO PRESS THE BRAKES, THE MOTOR SLOWED DOWN AND THE CAR EVENTUALLY SLOWED. IT SOUNDED LIKE PRESSING THE ACCELERATOR DOWN HARD TO PASS ANOTHER CAR ON A TWO LANE ROAD.
NHTSA complaint #10445617 — an unverified report by a vehicle owner.