Owners have filed 215 complaints
about the 2015 Toyota Prius with NHTSA between 2015 and 2026.
The largest single group is the brakes.
Across this model's run it ranks 10 of 25 worst.
The letter says how bad. This says what kind — whether this year drew
an unusual number of complaints, unusually dangerous
ones, or failures that arrived unusually early.
The dashed ring is 50 — the national norm. Further out is worse.
Complaint volume — 17
Against the median year of the Toyota Prius. 50 means typical for this
model; 100 means roughly double.
Severity — 100
36.7% of these complaints
involved a crash, fire, injury or death, against a national rate of
9.7%.
Early failure — 100
60% of failures with a mileage on record happened under
36,000 miles, against a national rate of
29%.
Odometer readings owners gave when they filed. About half of all
complaints include one.
Under 1,000 miles
77.3%
1,000 – 9,999 miles
2526.0%
10,000 – 24,999 miles
1515.6%
25,000 – 49,999 miles
1818.8%
50,000 – 74,999 miles
1111.5%
75,000 – 99,999 miles
77.3%
100,000 – 149,999 miles
1010.4%
150,000+ miles
33.1%
NHTSA crash tests
The agency crash-tested this model year itself. These are its own
photographs and star ratings.
Frontal crash test
Side barrier crash test
Side pole crash test
Photographs taken by NHTSA during its own New Car Assessment Program crash
tests of this model year. Public domain.
Configuration
Overall
Front
Side
Rollover
2015 Toyota Prius 5 HB FWD
12.1% risk
When owners complained
A spike years after the car went on sale usually means a part wearing
out on schedule across the whole fleet — the kind of pattern no single
owner can see from inside their own car.
Jan 2015peak 8Aug 2026
NHTSA investigations into the 2015 Toyota Prius
An investigation is the step before a recall: the agency has seen enough
complaints to look into a pattern itself. An open one means it thinks
something may be wrong and nothing has been fixed yet.
1
investigation is
still open.
DP23005Opened 22 Nov 2023Still openSERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC:FOUNDATION COMPONENTS
Brake Actuator Valve Wear
The Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) has received a petition dated September 19, 2023 from the owner of a 2012 Toyota Prius V requesting that ODI reevaluate its decision to deny DP19-004. In the letter, the petitioner reported experiencing an unexpected and complete loss of brake power while driving, accompanied by multiple dashboard warning lights. This petition is based on the petitioner's direct experience and assessment that ODI closed DP19-004 because its prompting petition was withdrawn by that petitioner. ODI will review the work conducted during DP19-004 and a review of any additi...
DP22005Opened 27 Jan 2023Closed 7 Aug 2023ELECTRICAL SYSTEM:PROPULSION SYSTEM
Pedestrian alert sounds
NHTSA received a petition on or about July 18, 2022, requesting that Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS) 141 be applied to all electric and hybrid vehicles operating in the United States. The petition can be reviewed at NHTSA.gov under ODI Number 11486072. FMVSS 141 establishes performance requirements for pedestrian alert sounds for motor vehicles. The standard applies to hybrid and electric vehicles that have a gross vehicle weight rating of 4,536 KG or less or are defined as low-speed vehicles. The standard became fully applicable to all such vehicles manufactured on or after Marc...
DP19004Opened 30 Sep 2019Closed 21 Jan 2021SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC:POWER ASSIST
Brake Actuator Valve Wear
On September 19, 2019, the Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) received a defect petition from Mr. Roger Hogan requesting that the Agency investigate and recall certain Toyota Prius, Prius PHV, Camry Hybrid and Avalon Hybrid vehicles for a brake actuator valve wear condition covered under Toyota Customer Support Programs ZJB and ZKK (subject CSP?s). In support of his request, the petitioner identified 117 NHTSA complaints allegedly related to the subject CSP condition, including 60 reporting crashes. On September 30, 2019, ODI opened Defect Petition DP19-004 to evaluate the petitioner?s requ...
Recalls on the 2015 Toyota Prius
A complaint is one owner's allegation. A recall is the point at which
the manufacturer or a regulator agreed the defect is real and dangerous
enough to fix for free — however old the car is.
Canada — Transport Canada
Canada runs its own recall programme, and its campaigns do not
always mirror the American ones.
Recall 202172355,683 units in Canada
Electrical
Issue: This recall is for certain block heater kits installed on certain vehicles or sold as accessories at Toyota or Lexus dealerships. On certain vehicles, the engine block heater cable may not have enough heat protection and could be damaged by high temperatures. If this happens, the cable could short circuit while plugged in, and cause the wiring to overheat or melt. Note: This recall only affects the following block heater/cord part numbers: C014003034 PK5A408J09 PU14000904 C014003151 PK5A408J13 PU14000905 C014000885 PK5A489J11 PU14000907 C014000888 PK5A489J22 PU14000909 C014000907 PK5A410H00 PU14000911 C014100904 PU14000900 PU14000913 C014100907 PU14000901 PU14003571 C014100911 PU14000902 PK5A489J14 PK5A408J05 PU14000903 Safety Risk: Engine block heater wiring that overheats or melts could create the risk of a fire. Corrective Actions: Toyota recommends that you should stop using the engine block heater immediately. Toyota will notify owners by mail and instruct you to take your vehicle to a dealer to disable the engine block heater. For some vehicles, the corrective actions for this recall are under development. For others, a new engine block heater cannot be installed, and the owner will receive a refund of the purchase price of the engine block heater.
Recall 202028411,576 units in Canada
Electrical
Issue: The Intelligent Power Module (IPM), which is part of the hybrid drive system, could become damaged under certain driving conditions. This could cause various warnings to appear on the instrument panel and cause the hybrid system to shut down. If this happens, there can be a loss of power to the wheels. Safety Risk: A loss of power to the wheels could create the risk of a crash. Corrective Actions: Toyota will notify owners by mail and instruct you to take your vehicle to a dealer to update the software for the hybrid system.
Recall 20194205,327 units in Canada
Other
Issue: This recall is for aftermarket replacement rear window glass produced by Vitro Automotriz. Certain rear window glass may not have been properly tempered. If the window breaks, the glass may separate into large pieces instead of very small ones. Note: This is a voluntary recall that is not being conducted under the requirements of the Motor Vehicle Safety Act. Safety Risk: Glass that breaks in to large pieces could create a risk of injury. Corrective Actions: The company will notify consumers by mail and instruct them to inspect the designation code marked on the rear window glass. Products affected by this recall have the designation “DOT 287” along with the lettering “VMR” (Replacement Market) and a date code that is before July 2019. This information is printed on the bottom corner of the glass. Consumers should contact Vitro's customer service at 1-412-995-6457 or argbacklites@vitro.com to arrange for replacement of the glass.
Recall 2017558363 units in Canada
Powertrain
On certain plug-in hybrid vehicles, the electric vehicle (EV) hybrid battery's fuse could be subjected to excessive thermal stress and potentially fracture if the vehicle is operated by the electric motor under high-load driving conditions, such as during a long ascent. This would illuminate warning lights and warning messages in the instrument cluster, and in some cases cause the vehicle to enter a fail-safe mode resulting in reduced motive power. In other cases, the hybrid system could shut down, resulting in loss of motive power, which could increase the risk of a crash causing injury and/or property damage. Correction: Dealers will replace the EV fuse with a new one of an improved design.
Reports where the owner recorded a crash, a fire, an injury or a death.
Fuquay-Varina, NCCrash1 injured
SEATS
I was rear-ended by a truck in my prius and my seat laid back on impact. I'm unaware if that was an intended thing or not but it potentially could have injured my neck. My car is currently in a storage lot awaiting the adjustor's inspection so it is available for inspection if needed. No warning lights were available and it hasn't been recreated by the dealer
NHTSA complaint #11753382 — an unverified report by a vehicle owner.
Huntington Beach, CACrash
ELECTRICAL SYSTEM
Pulling out of a parking stall, when put vehicle in drive, the engine revved up and accelerated - vehicle crashed, the brakes did not work- there was skid marks. Floor mats are factory OEM were installed properly. I did not hit the accelerator and I am in good health and mind. I have driving for over 30 years, never had and accident nor a ticket! - A county officer was at the seen and left me with vehicle that had to be towed away. The Vehicle is a total loss. I have insurance but felt that this incident need to be reported, There is no safety recalls and the vehicle was always property maintained
NHTSA complaint #11750516 — an unverified report by a vehicle owner.
Huntington Beach, CACrash
ENGINE
Pulling out of a parking stall, when put vehicle in drive, the engine revved up and accelerated - vehicle crashed, the brakes did not work- there was skid marks. Floor mats are factory OEM were installed properly. I did not hit the accelerator and I am in good health and mind. I have driving for over 30 years, never had and accident nor a ticket! - A county officer was at the seen and left me with vehicle that had to be towed away. The Vehicle is a total loss. I have insurance but felt that this incident need to be reported, There is no safety recalls and the vehicle was always property maintained
NHTSA complaint #11750516 — an unverified report by a vehicle owner.
at 205,000 milesCarpentersville, ILCrash2 injured
SEATS
The contact owns a 2015 Toyota Prius. The contact stated that while driving and coming to a complete stop, the vehicle was rear-ended by another vehicle driving approximately 35-45 MPH. The contact stated that upon impact, the front driver's seat unexpectedly reclined and struck the rear passenger’s seat. The contact was concerned about the movement of the seat and stated that an occupant seated directly behind the driver's seat could have been injured. The rear bumper, trunk, and rear body structure sustained damage from the crash. The contact stated that the force of the impact caused the rear driver’s side body panels to flare outward and become deformed. No additional property damage had occurred from the crash. The vehicle remained in the roadway following the crash. There was no warning light illuminated. The contact sustained neck injuries, whiplash, and emotional trauma from the crash. Medical attention was sought. The Uber passenger inside the vehicle was also transported from the scene to seek medical attention and treatment; however, the extent of the injury was unknown. The contact considered the vehicle a total loss by the contact, but the vehicle was not declared a total loss. The vehicle was towed to a tow yard. The vehicle was not diagnosed or repaired. The manufacturer was not notified of the failure. The approximate failure mileage was 205,000.
NHTSA complaint #11744174 — an unverified report by a vehicle owner.
San Diego, CACrash1 injured
SERVICE BRAKES
On the morning of December 11th, 2024, the brake system warning light (ABS, yellow) illuminated on the dashboard along with the red BRAKE indicator and the yellow Vehicle Stability Control (VSC) system light. I consulted a mechanic who performed a computer diagnostic and informed me that the ABS module booster had failed. He said that will order the part to change it but meanwhile he advised me to drive more cautiously and maintain a greater distance from the vehicle ahead, allowing extra space for my car to stop due to the increased braking distance caused by the failed ABS module booster. Later that day, at approximately 5:30 PM, I was driving home in heavy traffic, with speeds not exceeding 40 miles per hour. The vehicle in front of me began to decelerate abruptly. When I applied firm pressure to the brake pedal to slow down my car, it lost all control. The vehicle began to skid, with the amplitude of the skid increasing progressively. It struck the highway guardrail on the left, changed trajectory, crossed all four lanes to the right uncontrollably, and ultimately collided with the highway guardrail on the right side.
NHTSA complaint #11630769 — an unverified report by a vehicle owner.
Glendale, CACrash
UNKNOWN OR OTHER
I want to sale
NHTSA complaint #11619659 — an unverified report by a vehicle owner.
The most recent complaints
In the owners' own words, exactly as filed with NHTSA.
South Pasadena, CA
SERVICE BRAKES
Code DTC C1391 - Abnormal leak of accumulator pressure. Internal failure of the brake booster pump assembly, preventing the system from maintaining proper hydraulic pressure. This means the brakes don't work, putting the driver's and passengers' lives at risk. This DTC C1391 code and problem were reproduced and confirmed by an independent service center who specializes in 3rd generation priuses. There were warning lights that lit up when the brakes failed - the ABS, traction control, and brake light all lit up but only after the brakes had stopped working. This is a known manufacturer defect but toyota won't pay to fix it because they put a 10 year limit on first driven date or 150,000 miles. This prius only has 100k miles but toyota still won't stand behind their product even though they have admitted it was a manufacturing defect and they sold a defective product.
NHTSA complaint #11756229 — an unverified report by a vehicle owner.
Code DTC C1391 - Abnormal leak of accumulator pressure. Internal failure of the brake booster pump assembly, preventing the system from maintaining proper hydraulic pressure. This means the brakes don't work, putting the driver's and passengers' lives at risk. This DTC C1391 code and problem were reproduced and confirmed by an independent service center who specializes in 3rd generation priuses. There were warning lights that lit up when the brakes failed - the ABS, traction control, and brake light all lit up but only after the brakes had stopped working. This is a known manufacturer defect but toyota won't pay to fix it because they put a 10 year limit on first driven date or 150,000 miles. This prius only has 100k miles but toyota still won't stand behind their product even though they have admitted it was a manufacturing defect and they sold a defective product.
NHTSA complaint #11756229 — an unverified report by a vehicle owner.
Fuquay-Varina, NCCrash1 injured
SEATS
I was rear-ended by a truck in my prius and my seat laid back on impact. I'm unaware if that was an intended thing or not but it potentially could have injured my neck. My car is currently in a storage lot awaiting the adjustor's inspection so it is available for inspection if needed. No warning lights were available and it hasn't been recreated by the dealer
NHTSA complaint #11753382 — an unverified report by a vehicle owner.
Huntington Beach, CACrash
ELECTRICAL SYSTEM
Pulling out of a parking stall, when put vehicle in drive, the engine revved up and accelerated - vehicle crashed, the brakes did not work- there was skid marks. Floor mats are factory OEM were installed properly. I did not hit the accelerator and I am in good health and mind. I have driving for over 30 years, never had and accident nor a ticket! - A county officer was at the seen and left me with vehicle that had to be towed away. The Vehicle is a total loss. I have insurance but felt that this incident need to be reported, There is no safety recalls and the vehicle was always property maintained
NHTSA complaint #11750516 — an unverified report by a vehicle owner.
Huntington Beach, CACrash
ENGINE
Pulling out of a parking stall, when put vehicle in drive, the engine revved up and accelerated - vehicle crashed, the brakes did not work- there was skid marks. Floor mats are factory OEM were installed properly. I did not hit the accelerator and I am in good health and mind. I have driving for over 30 years, never had and accident nor a ticket! - A county officer was at the seen and left me with vehicle that had to be towed away. The Vehicle is a total loss. I have insurance but felt that this incident need to be reported, There is no safety recalls and the vehicle was always property maintained
NHTSA complaint #11750516 — an unverified report by a vehicle owner.
Redlands, CA
SERVICE BRAKES
The vehicle experienced a failure in the braking system involving the brake booster/brake actuator assembly. The vehicle displayed diagnostic trouble code C1391, which is associated with a malfunction of the brake booster pump/accumulator system on this model. The failed component is available for inspection upon request. The failure created a safety concern because the braking system warning lights illuminated and the vehicle’s brake assist system may not function properly. A malfunction of the brake actuator/booster system could increase stopping distance, reduce braking performance, and create a potential risk of a crash, especially during emergency braking situations. The problem has been confirmed through diagnosis showing the C1391 trouble code. The issue has been identified as a brake system malfunction requiring repair of the brake booster/actuator assembly. The vehicle has been inspected/diagnosed by a service professional. The vehicle has not been inspected by police or insurance representatives. Toyota/dealer inspection information is available if requested. I contacted Toyota regarding the issue, but they declined assistance because the extended warranty coverage expired approximately 7 months prior to the failure. Before the failure, the vehicle operated normally. The first symptoms occurred when multiple warning lights appeared while driving, including the ABS warning light, brake warning light, parking brake warning light (even though the parking brake was not engaged), and the traction control/slippery road warning light. These warning lights appeared suddenly, indicating a problem with the braking system.
NHTSA complaint #11746503 — an unverified report by a vehicle owner.
at 205,000 milesCarpentersville, ILCrash2 injured
SEATS
The contact owns a 2015 Toyota Prius. The contact stated that while driving and coming to a complete stop, the vehicle was rear-ended by another vehicle driving approximately 35-45 MPH. The contact stated that upon impact, the front driver's seat unexpectedly reclined and struck the rear passenger’s seat. The contact was concerned about the movement of the seat and stated that an occupant seated directly behind the driver's seat could have been injured. The rear bumper, trunk, and rear body structure sustained damage from the crash. The contact stated that the force of the impact caused the rear driver’s side body panels to flare outward and become deformed. No additional property damage had occurred from the crash. The vehicle remained in the roadway following the crash. There was no warning light illuminated. The contact sustained neck injuries, whiplash, and emotional trauma from the crash. Medical attention was sought. The Uber passenger inside the vehicle was also transported from the scene to seek medical attention and treatment; however, the extent of the injury was unknown. The contact considered the vehicle a total loss by the contact, but the vehicle was not declared a total loss. The vehicle was towed to a tow yard. The vehicle was not diagnosed or repaired. The manufacturer was not notified of the failure. The approximate failure mileage was 205,000.
NHTSA complaint #11744174 — an unverified report by a vehicle owner.
at 121,000 milesScottsdale, AZ
SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC
The contact owns a 2015 Toyota Prius. The contact stated that while driving at 45 MPH, the brake warning lights illuminated. The brakes were inoperable and entered manual mode. The contact stated that the brake warning lights were red and yellow. The vehicle was taken to Brake Masters, where it was diagnosed with brake actuator failure. The local dealer was contacted but did not provide assistance. The vehicle was not repaired. The manufacturer was not notified of the failure. The failure mileage was approximately 121,000.
NHTSA complaint #11743224 — an unverified report by a vehicle owner.
Cumming, GA
ELECTRICAL SYSTEM
The incident involved having to press extremely hard on the brake pedal to stop the car, while it was uphill in the middle of the road. The car started going backward and was throwing ABS, Master Warning Light, Brake System Warning Light and Warning Buzzer, Brake System Warning Light, and SLIP Indicator signals. This was a highly distraughtful situation on the road. Diagnostics showed C1391 Diagnostic Trouble Code on the 2015 Toyota Prius: brake booster and brake booster pump problem. When pressing the brake pedal there is a high pitched metal scraping noise. Toyota coverage program is only applicable for 10 years from the date of first use or 150,000 miles, whichever occurs first. Many cars run well for over 10 years with good care, so the 10 year cap barely covers anything. This is highly unfair and borderline scamming for an issue so severe, which can cause big accidents on the road. In all honesty, this is a life or death situation when it comes to not being able to properly brake while driving. This should be a full recall!!
NHTSA complaint #11742921 — an unverified report by a vehicle owner.
Cumming, GA
SERVICE BRAKES
The incident involved having to press extremely hard on the brake pedal to stop the car, while it was uphill in the middle of the road. The car started going backward and was throwing ABS, Master Warning Light, Brake System Warning Light and Warning Buzzer, Brake System Warning Light, and SLIP Indicator signals. This was a highly distraughtful situation on the road. Diagnostics showed C1391 Diagnostic Trouble Code on the 2015 Toyota Prius: brake booster and brake booster pump problem. When pressing the brake pedal there is a high pitched metal scraping noise. Toyota coverage program is only applicable for 10 years from the date of first use or 150,000 miles, whichever occurs first. Many cars run well for over 10 years with good care, so the 10 year cap barely covers anything. This is highly unfair and borderline scamming for an issue so severe, which can cause big accidents on the road. In all honesty, this is a life or death situation when it comes to not being able to properly brake while driving. This should be a full recall!!
NHTSA complaint #11742921 — an unverified report by a vehicle owner.
Atlanta, GA
ELECTRICAL SYSTEM
The brake pump and actuator on my 2015 prius has been faulty and the repair was apparently covered under the customer support program but it expired in December. I had no knowledge of it and when I took my car in to a toyota dealership, no one told me about about the profram but told me that they needed to be replaced. I did not get the repair because of the hefty cost and I missed the deadline. My safety and the safety of other drivers were put at risk for not allowing me to be notified by it and my car being at risk for my brakes failing at any time. Their were absolutely no warning lights on my vehicle as well.
NHTSA complaint #11741829 — an unverified report by a vehicle owner.
Atlanta, GA
SERVICE BRAKES
The brake pump and actuator on my 2015 prius has been faulty and the repair was apparently covered under the customer support program but it expired in December. I had no knowledge of it and when I took my car in to a toyota dealership, no one told me about about the profram but told me that they needed to be replaced. I did not get the repair because of the hefty cost and I missed the deadline. My safety and the safety of other drivers were put at risk for not allowing me to be notified by it and my car being at risk for my brakes failing at any time. Their were absolutely no warning lights on my vehicle as well.
NHTSA complaint #11741829 — an unverified report by a vehicle owner.
Portola Valley, CA
STRUCTURE:BODY
The factory clear coat has delaminated
NHTSA complaint #11741039 — an unverified report by a vehicle owner.
Manchester, NH
UNKNOWN OR OTHER
Unknown
NHTSA complaint #11740742 — an unverified report by a vehicle owner.
Santa Cruz, CA
SERVICE BRAKES
I was driving my 2015 prius for years and occasionally the brake, abs and traction light would come on this is a sign of a failing Brake actuator and booster. Toyota and the Ntsb ordered the following warranty enhancement https://static.nhtsa.gov/odi/tsbs/2020/MC-10181800-9999.pdf My Brake Booster had been exhibiting signs of failing for years and I tried to get a toyota dealership to replace and repair the parts under the warranty extension but I was told I had to wait until I had perminent dash lights and trouble codes. So I had to wait till the booster completely failed. By that time my car had exited the extended warranty perimeters and I am told it is no longer eligible.... even though the components are faulty from the factory and exhibited signs of failure many years prior. I was told to wait until the compenent failed by multiple dealers. My car was in motion and the brake boosters failed, fortunatly it did not cause an accident but this is a serious safety issue. Toyota should have done a compleat recall of the brake actuator and booster pump, rather than have drivers use known faulty components until failure. Toyota corporate has refused to help in the repair of the vehicle despite it showing failure for years.
NHTSA complaint #11740085 — an unverified report by a vehicle owner.
Ontario, CA
SERVICE BRAKES
Code C1391 200k miles All the warning signs for brake booster issue came up. The cost is too high and I just missed the Customer Support Program timelines because the code came up late. This needs to be a RECALL, based on how many people experience this issue consistently.
NHTSA complaint #11740166 — an unverified report by a vehicle owner.
Code C1391 200k miles All the warning signs for brake booster issue came up. The cost is too high and I just missed the Customer Support Program timelines because the code came up late. This needs to be a RECALL, based on how many people experience this issue consistently.
NHTSA complaint #11740166 — an unverified report by a vehicle owner.
Valencia, CA
SERVICE BRAKES
Toyota Prius has a known problem with the brake actuator and booster. A notice was sent out in 2019 under the Customer Support Program Expansion with repairs up to 10 years or 150k miles. This is a safety issue and should be covered under a recall with NO TIME OR MILEAGE LIMITS since these problems are not showing up until after 10 years if the car has low mileage, as in our case. We just passed the 10 year mark, but only has 114k miles. No mention of repairs needed were made during regular maintenance visits with Toyota. Additionally, preventative repairs were not offered if the vehicle did not seem to be experiencing problems at that time. The brakes are spongy and unresponsive. The ABS light , traction warning lights, and parking brake lights are staying on.
NHTSA complaint #11736895 — an unverified report by a vehicle owner.
Torrance, CA
SERVICE BRAKES
ABS braking system suddenly not working. ABS, BRAKE, and traction control lights all turned on.
NHTSA complaint #11736350 — an unverified report by a vehicle owner.
Downey, CA
SERVICE BRAKES
On 4/16/26, while driving my 2015 Toyota Prius (approximately 87,000 miles) on the freeway, I applied the brakes while transitioning from the [XXX] onto the [XXX] . As I veered right on the curved onramp, the brakes failed to engage properly, causing the vehicle to spin out of control and collide with the side railing. There were fortunately no nearby vehicles on the 2-lane onramp at the time. Under slightly different circumstances, this incident could easily have resulted in serious injury or death to myself and/or others. No airbags deployed. Although I was physically unharmed, I was extremely shaken by the incident. Immediately after the collision, the brake warning light, ABS warning light, and another warning indicator illuminated on the dashboard. Prior to the incident, I had not experienced braking problems severe enough to suggest imminent failure. On 4/17/26, I brought the vehicle to Toyota of Cerritos for diagnostic evaluation. I was informed that the brake booster was the issue and that the vehicle was unsafe to drive. The vehicle was towed to a collision repair center affiliated with my insurance company. After repairing the external collision damage, the collision center informed me that the brake booster malfunction that caused the incident could not be repaired there and would require dealership service. External repair alone: $3706, in addition to increased automobile insurance premiums expected over the next 3 years. I also contacted Toyota Motor Corporation regarding Customer Support Program coverage related to brake booster issues and was informed that the program expired in 2025 and no assistance would be provided. I am submitting this report because this brake booster malfunction created a serious and unexpected safety hazard resulting in loss of vehicle control on a freeway interchange. INFORMATION REDACTED PURSUANT TO THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 552(B)(6)
NHTSA complaint #11736160 — an unverified report by a vehicle owner.
New Orleans, LA
SERVICE BRAKES
In June 2025, while driving on the highway, the vehicle suddenly displayed multiple brake warning lights and warning messages, including the red brake warning light, ABS light, brake system warning light, and traction/slip indicator. At the same time, the brake pedal became stiff and braking effort increased suddenly, creating a near-crash situation because the vehicle did not slow normally. Before that incident, the vehicle had already been making abnormal brake-related noises, including a humming/pumping noise when the brake pedal was applied, and there were intermittent episodes where braking felt abnormal. In June 2025, the vehicle was taken to a Toyota dealership during Toyota’s brake booster support program period. The dealership documented customer complaints of “humming noise in cabin when holding foot on the brakes,” a request to “scan for codes for ZJB enhancement,” and that the “vehicle hard to accelerate and brakes got stiff,” but stated that no qualifying ABS codes were present at that time. In March 2026, the same condition returned and worsened. The vehicle again displayed the red brake warning light, ABS light, brake system warning light, and traction/slip light, and braking performance was reduced. An OBD scan of the ABS control unit showed code C1391, which is associated with brake booster / ABS actuator failure. The Toyota dealership has now diagnosed the vehicle with ABS actuator and brake booster failure and quoted repair. This is a serious safety issue because braking became more difficult while driving, including on the highway, with sudden warning lights and degraded stopping ability. The failed components are available for inspection. The problem has now been confirmed by a Toyota dealership. The issue was reported to a Toyota dealership during the prior support-program period but was not confirmed then.
NHTSA complaint #11725874 — an unverified report by a vehicle owner.
Redondo Beach, CA
SERVICE BRAKES
Brake Booster and ABS, Brake Master Cylinder went out in car without any lights or warning while driving the vehicle at a moderate speed on Freeway. I was able to avoid an accident and take the car to a repair shop in which at 119K miles and just at 10.5 yrs old the entire brake system had to be replaced/repaired.
NHTSA complaint #11725935 — an unverified report by a vehicle owner.
Raleigh, NC
SERVICE BRAKES
My brake actuator and brake booster are failing. All of my dashboard lights have come on (brake, ABS, Traction Control, brake system warning light). Unfortunately, I am over 10 years and Toyota is saying that I need to pay out of pocket for the repairs. This is a known problem and should be covered. I was unaware of the known issue and my car didn't start having problems until after the 10 year mark. I am under 150,000 miles.
NHTSA complaint #11725978 — an unverified report by a vehicle owner.
In June 2025, while driving on the highway, the vehicle suddenly displayed multiple brake warning lights and warning messages, including the red brake warning light, ABS light, brake system warning light, and traction/slip indicator. At the same time, the brake pedal became stiff and braking effort increased suddenly, creating a near-crash situation because the vehicle did not slow normally. Before that incident, the vehicle had already been making abnormal brake-related noises, including a humming/pumping noise when the brake pedal was applied, and there were intermittent episodes where braking felt abnormal. In June 2025, the vehicle was taken to a Toyota dealership during Toyota’s brake booster support program period. The dealership documented customer complaints of “humming noise in cabin when holding foot on the brakes,” a request to “scan for codes for ZJB enhancement,” and that the “vehicle hard to accelerate and brakes got stiff,” but stated that no qualifying ABS codes were present at that time. In March 2026, the same condition returned and worsened. The vehicle again displayed the red brake warning light, ABS light, brake system warning light, and traction/slip light, and braking performance was reduced. An OBD scan of the ABS control unit showed code C1391, which is associated with brake booster / ABS actuator failure. The Toyota dealership has now diagnosed the vehicle with ABS actuator and brake booster failure and quoted repair. This is a serious safety issue because braking became more difficult while driving, including on the highway, with sudden warning lights and degraded stopping ability. The failed components are available for inspection. The problem has now been confirmed by a Toyota dealership. The issue was reported to a Toyota dealership during the prior support-program period but was not confirmed then.
NHTSA complaint #11725874 — an unverified report by a vehicle owner.
Arcadia, CA
SERVICE BRAKES
TOYOTA PRIUS ABS BRAKE PUMP ACTUATOR BOOSTER FAILING Making hissing noises and warning icon at only 10 years 9 month, 85,000 miles. Toyota extended warranty is NOT covering.
NHTSA complaint #11724157 — an unverified report by a vehicle owner.
